From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
To: lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org
Subject: [lustre-devel] [PATCH 3/3] staging: lustre: Less function calls in class_register_type() after error detection
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 08:08:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5656AFEC.8030709@users.sourceforge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151125163901.GA7368@kroah.com>
Am 25.11.2015 um 17:39 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 01:20:33PM +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
>> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
>> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 12:48:58 +0100
>>
>> The functions "kfree" and "kobject_put" were called in a few cases by the
>> function "class_register_type" during error handling even if the passed
>> variable contained a null pointer.
>>
>> This implementation detail could be improved by the adjustment of
>> jump targets.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
>> ---
>> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/genops.c | 26 +++++++++++++++----------
>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> Does not apply to my staging-next branch :(
I get also a result like the following together with the software "Linux next-20151126". ;-)
elfring at Sonne:~/Projekte/Linux/next-patched> LANG=C git apply ~/Projekte/Bau/Linux/scripts/Coccinelle/deletions1/next/20151102/Flicken/0003-staging-lustre-Less-function-calls-in-class_register.patch
error: patch failed: drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/genops.c:214
error: drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/genops.c: patch does not apply
Do you try this update suggestion out without integrating the corresponding previous
update suggestion "Delete unnecessary checks before two function calls"
where I proposed to remove extra checks before a few calls of the function "kobject_put"
(which seems to matter for the patch hunk in the shown error message)?
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/5/276
https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org/msg1013635.html
Would you like to reject the first update step from this patch series
so that I need to adapt my approach to your software design decision?
Regards,
Markus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-26 7:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <5307CAA2.8060406@users.sourceforge.net>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402212321410.2043@localhost6.localdomain6>
[not found] ` <530A086E.8010901@users.sourceforge.net>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402231635510.1985@localhost6.localdomain6>
[not found] ` <530A72AA.3000601@users.sourceforge.net>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402240658210.2090@localhost6.localdomain6>
[not found] ` <530B5FB6.6010207@users.sourceforge.net>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.10.1402241710370.2074@hadrien>
[not found] ` <530C5E18.1020800@users.sourceforge.net>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.10.1402251014170.2080@hadrien>
[not found] ` <530CD2C4.4050903@users.sourceforge.net>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.10.1402251840450.7035@hadrien>
[not found] ` <530CF8FF.8080600@users.sourceforge.net>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402252117150.2047@localhost6.localdomain6>
[not found] ` <530DD06F.4090703@users.sourceforge.net>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402262129250.2221@localhost6.localdomain6>
[not found] ` <5317A59D.4@users.sourceforge.net>
2015-11-05 12:10 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 0/3] staging: lustre: Deletion of some unnecessary checks SF Markus Elfring
2015-11-05 12:15 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 1/3] staging: lustre: Delete unnecessary checks before two function calls SF Markus Elfring
2015-11-05 12:57 ` Dan Carpenter
2015-11-05 12:18 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 2/3] staging: lustre: Delete an unnecessary variable initialisation in class_register_type() SF Markus Elfring
2015-11-05 12:57 ` Dan Carpenter
2015-11-05 12:20 ` [lustre-devel] [PATCH 3/3] staging: lustre: Less function calls in class_register_type() after error detection SF Markus Elfring
2015-11-25 16:39 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-11-26 7:08 ` SF Markus Elfring [this message]
2015-11-26 16:53 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-11-26 19:02 ` SF Markus Elfring
2015-11-26 20:01 ` Dan Carpenter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5656AFEC.8030709@users.sourceforge.net \
--to=elfring@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).