From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SF Markus Elfring Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 19:49:39 +0100 Subject: [lustre-devel] staging: lustre: Delete unnecessary goto statements in six functions In-Reply-To: <1450204451.4142.19.camel@perches.com> References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net> <566D7733.1030102@users.sourceforge.net> <566D7830.9060000@users.sourceforge.net> <1450189676.3551.1.camel@perches.com> <20151215144133.GC5284@mwanda> <1450191751.3551.14.camel@perches.com> <20151215174844.GE5284@mwanda> <1450203011.4142.4.camel@perches.com> <56705B71.6090307@users.sourceforge.net> <1450204451.4142.19.camel@perches.com> Message-ID: <567060C3.5070608@users.sourceforge.net> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org > I think there should _not_ be a hardened rule. I guess that it can become hard to achieve consensus on a precise rule. > Style is just a guide. Generally nice ? > Do what you think appropriate. I'm sorry for my evolving understanding. - But I imagine that your feedback can cause further software development troubles if the acceptance for this update suggestion will really depend on the number of blank lines before a jump label. Regards, Markus