From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B3794696 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2022 14:22:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 624B8C433C1; Fri, 29 Jul 2022 14:22:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1659104549; bh=FYp7dxRuDa2TzbtLpfE1k1l6o7hR4ycZLxQgQwCsplA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=gI52e6Jn7VE10U5yCiJqdCtJ8vq4VD1COs74rMHOXEDNUAB313zvt0660JPDJ89vL uRPByAcorrzRsXtzw4UHnEJYFgnZ0epF0+cuXPtDnI7WiYrbh8tDpLbH5ehEusMPBg eNhTd/WKCWFGW0aqvwRSSQZedj1nbkhf51FcitmIv3mV+5IihAseMfE30NzpLOZ+yz Vbrkd030U5POnTAx7Z0DMhjniNQpxIMtQyv4s34uHp67VcwJhg0wPbvzzST6nu9tlq e55lT7qkLZFj0rAWah49KRFUemdcWzLi8jfIAxIEaMFW92wBqgfG7GfQR8uG/sz0BC dVxKcR7Sz1vGw== Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2022 19:52:21 +0530 From: Manivannan Sadhasivam To: Kalle Valo Cc: Qiang Yu , quic_hemantk@quicinc.com, loic.poulain@linaro.org, quic_jhugo@quicinc.com, mhi@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, quic_cang@quicinc.com, ath11k@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] bus: mhi: host: Fix up null pointer access in mhi_irq_handler Message-ID: <20220729142221.GA9937@thinkpad> References: <1658459838-30802-1-git-send-email-quic_qianyu@quicinc.com> <20220726080636.GE5522@workstation> <87czdrrc95.fsf@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: mhi@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87czdrrc95.fsf@kernel.org> On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 08:53:58PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: > Manivannan Sadhasivam writes: > > > +ath11k, Kalle > > > > On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 11:17:18AM +0800, Qiang Yu wrote: > >> The irq handler for a shared IRQ ought to be prepared for running > >> even now it's being freed. So let's check the pointer used by > >> mhi_irq_handler to avoid null pointer access since it is probably > >> released before freeing IRQ. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Qiang Yu > > > > Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam > > This fixes the crash and my regression tests pass now, thanks. But > please see my question below. > > Tested-by: Kalle Valo > Thanks Kalle! > >> + /* > >> + * If CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ is set, the IRQ handler will get invoked during __free_irq() > >> + * and by that time mhi_ctxt() would've freed. So check for the existence of mhi_ctxt > >> + * before handling the IRQs. > >> + */ > >> + if (!mhi_cntrl->mhi_ctxt) { > >> + dev_dbg(&mhi_cntrl->mhi_dev->dev, > >> + "mhi_ctxt has been freed\n"); > >> + return IRQ_HANDLED; > >> + } > > I don't see any protection accessing mhi_cntrl->mhi_ctxt, is this really > free of race conditions? > As Qiang said, it is safe to access mhi_ctxt here. Thanks, Mani > -- > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ > > https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches -- மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்