From: Moritz Wilhelmy <ml+mmj@wzff.de>
To: mlmmj@mlmmj.org
Subject: [mlmmj] read(2) syscall bloat
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 11:56:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110905115603.GC22957@barfooze.de> (raw)
Hello,
mlmmj currently does a read(2) system call for every single byte it
reads from a file descriptor. This is unnecessarily inefficient and
slow.
Strace output is similar to the following:
open("/var/spool/mlmmj/foo/control/listaddress", O_RDONLY) = 4
read(4, "f", 1) = 1
read(4, "o", 1) = 1
read(4, "o", 1) = 1
read(4, "@", 1) = 1
read(4, "l", 1) = 1
read(4, "i", 1) = 1
read(4, "s", 1) = 1
read(4, "t", 1) = 1
read(4, "s", 1) = 1
read(4, ".", 1) = 1
read(4, "e", 1) = 1
read(4, "x", 1) = 1
read(4, "a", 1) = 1
read(4, "m", 1) = 1
read(4, "p", 1) = 1
read(4, "l", 1) = 1
read(4, "e", 1) = 1
read(4, ".", 1) = 1
read(4, "c", 1) = 1
read(4, "o", 1) = 1
read(4, "m", 1) = 1
read(4, "\n", 1) = 1
close(4) = 0
Given that there is a getline(3) function in POSIX.1-2008, shouldn't it
be possible to retire mygetline?
I've previously posted this issue to the musl mailing list [1], which
has an "anti-bloat side project", but I've been putting the mail to this
list off.
I don't see where any of Rich's arguments from [2] apply. Can anyone
please explain why it was done this way in the first place?
[1] http://www.openwall.com/lists/musl/2011/08/16/8
[2] http://www.openwall.com/lists/musl/2011/08/16/11
Moritz
next reply other threads:[~2011-09-05 11:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-05 11:56 Moritz Wilhelmy [this message]
2011-09-05 12:30 ` [mlmmj] read(2) syscall bloat Lukas Fleischer
2011-09-05 12:34 ` Ben Schmidt
2011-09-05 12:46 ` Lukas Fleischer
2011-09-05 12:57 ` Moritz Wilhelmy
2011-09-09 8:24 ` Thomas Goirand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110905115603.GC22957@barfooze.de \
--to=ml+mmj@wzff.de \
--cc=mlmmj@mlmmj.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox