Re: [mlmmj] Encrypted list

[Patrice Levesque <mlmmj.wayne@ptaff.ca>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1015 bytes --]


> Myself, I know only a handful of poeple that I can trust to hold their
> mailbox secure... and even with them I don't use encrypted email just
> because I don't have anything so sensitive to say, so it will be just
> a hassle or a moslty pointless excercise of GPG skills.

If I may add my 2 cents, encrypting regular non-sensitive mail does not
appear pointless to me.

For one thing it ensures that GPG mail setups are properly configured
all the time and ready when needed for critical data.

It also gives the intelligence agencies something bogus to chew on; let
them waste resources deciphering cat pictures.

Lastly, the current poor adoption rate of encryption makes every GPG'd
mail stick out.  Encrypting non-sensitive data lessens that effect.



-- 
 --====|====--
    --------================|================--------
        Patrice Levesque
         http://ptaff.ca/
        mlmmj.wayne@ptaff.ca
    --------================|================--------
 --====|====--
--

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]