From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: theo borm Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 13:51:02 +0000 Subject: Re: [mlmmj] mlmmj and spf Message-Id: <4FAD1C84.1050401@borm.org> List-Id: References: <4FACFAE7.60904@borm.org> In-Reply-To: <4FACFAE7.60904@borm.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: mlmmj@mlmmj.org On 05/11/2012 03:20 PM, Ben Schmidt wrote: > > I think it's pretty unlikely I would accept a change to Mlmmj to work > around a buggy SPF implementation. Hi Ben, I would be the last to suggest a patch to work around a Sender-Id misconfiguration. ;-) However, a patch allowing slightly more advanced header manipulations (say regexp match/replace, between delheader and customheader), would /that/ be welcomed? regards, Theo