From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Schmidt Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 14:56:39 +0000 Subject: Re: [mlmmj] mlmmj and spf Message-Id: <4FAD28A7.1030209@yahoo.com.au> List-Id: References: <4FACFAE7.60904@borm.org> In-Reply-To: <4FACFAE7.60904@borm.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: mlmmj@mlmmj.org On 12/05/12 12:04 AM, theo borm wrote: > On 05/11/2012 03:20 PM, Ben Schmidt wrote: >> >> I think it's pretty unlikely I would accept a change to Mlmmj to work >> around a buggy SPF implementation. > > I would be the last to suggest a patch to work around a Sender-Id > misconfiguration. ;-) > > However, a patch allowing slightly more advanced header manipulations > (say regexp match/replace, between delheader and customheader), would > /that/ be welcomed? Hi, Theo, Yes, I'd quite probably accept such a change, provided it is kept simple, and particularly if some specifics are floated past the mailing list prior to preparing a patch, so people have a chance to raise any issues. There are also some pending changes to header stuff in the bug tracker, so it would be good to at least keep those in mind, or even implement them along with the new code (probably in separate patches, but nonetheless, the work is related and might be good to be implemented together). Cheers, Ben.