Re: AI Policy of the project.

["Jona Müller" <Jona.Mueller@independend.ch>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1787 bytes --]

Hello Borja,

this project has had a bunch of AI-assisted commits, you can read about it in
the following codeberg issue:

	https://codeberg.org/mlmmj/mlmmj/issues/105

Hope this helps,

- jm

On Fri, Jul 10, 2026 at 12:19:38PM +0000, Borja Velasco wrote:
> Hello mlmmj users and developers.
> 
> I'm writing you because I'm starting project that wants to create a
> community and software where the LLM usage is fully optional (now it's
> not anymore since almost every system is being developed with LLMs so
> you are using LLM indirectly).
> 
> I think that Software is a kind of art and we want a site where you
> can really use human art in your computer. Of course, I understand
> that no every person with think like me. I want to clarify that I
> compare software as architecture, is art and is useful, there are real
> structures that are beautiful and you'll love to be in and use it.
> Software allows everyone to use this kind of useful art.
> 
> That's because I am doing a real effort to create a database of
> software that uses LLMs or has been developed with LLMs and that
> will use for our operations. (avoiding software creating with
> LLMs in our main repositories and classifying the usage and
> policy in this software to add to our "AI allowed repo" that only
> wants to be really transparent with people to know how they're
> using AI.
> 
> For that reason, before use your mail software as our mailing list
> software "by default" and add it to our future repositories I need
> to know if you are using LLMs to made new characteristics or for 
> solving bugs or every use.
> 
> Of course, I have no problems with your LLM usage if you use
> LLMs. I'm asking only for classification use.
> 
> Greetings, Borja.
> 
> 

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]