From: akpm@linux-foundation.org
To: mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca, mingo@elte.hu, paulmck@us.ibm.com,
mm-commits@vger.kernel.org
Subject: - markers-use-rcu_barrier_sched-and-call_rcu_sched.patch removed from -mm tree
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:02:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200807252302.m6PN2bTZ003840@imap1.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
The patch titled
markers: use rcu_barrier_sched() and call_rcu_sched()
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
markers-use-rcu_barrier_sched-and-call_rcu_sched.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: markers: use rcu_barrier_sched() and call_rcu_sched()
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
rcu_barrier_sched() and call_rcu_sched() were introduced in 2.6.26 for the
Markers. Change the marker code to use them.
It can be seen as a fix since the marker code was using an ugly,
temporary, #ifdef hack to work around CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU.
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
Acked-by: Paul McKenney <paulmck@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
kernel/marker.c | 25 ++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff -puN kernel/marker.c~markers-use-rcu_barrier_sched-and-call_rcu_sched kernel/marker.c
--- a/kernel/marker.c~markers-use-rcu_barrier_sched-and-call_rcu_sched
+++ a/kernel/marker.c
@@ -441,7 +441,7 @@ static int remove_marker(const char *nam
hlist_del(&e->hlist);
/* Make sure the call_rcu has been executed */
if (e->rcu_pending)
- rcu_barrier();
+ rcu_barrier_sched();
kfree(e);
return 0;
}
@@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ static int marker_set_format(struct mark
hlist_del(&(*entry)->hlist);
/* Make sure the call_rcu has been executed */
if ((*entry)->rcu_pending)
- rcu_barrier();
+ rcu_barrier_sched();
kfree(*entry);
*entry = e;
trace_mark(core_marker_format, "name %s format %s",
@@ -655,7 +655,7 @@ int marker_probe_register(const char *na
* make sure it's executed now.
*/
if (entry->rcu_pending)
- rcu_barrier();
+ rcu_barrier_sched();
old = marker_entry_add_probe(entry, probe, probe_private);
if (IS_ERR(old)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(old);
@@ -670,10 +670,7 @@ int marker_probe_register(const char *na
entry->rcu_pending = 1;
/* write rcu_pending before calling the RCU callback */
smp_wmb();
-#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
- synchronize_sched(); /* Until we have the call_rcu_sched() */
-#endif
- call_rcu(&entry->rcu, free_old_closure);
+ call_rcu_sched(&entry->rcu, free_old_closure);
end:
mutex_unlock(&markers_mutex);
return ret;
@@ -704,7 +701,7 @@ int marker_probe_unregister(const char *
if (!entry)
goto end;
if (entry->rcu_pending)
- rcu_barrier();
+ rcu_barrier_sched();
old = marker_entry_remove_probe(entry, probe, probe_private);
mutex_unlock(&markers_mutex);
marker_update_probes(); /* may update entry */
@@ -716,10 +713,7 @@ int marker_probe_unregister(const char *
entry->rcu_pending = 1;
/* write rcu_pending before calling the RCU callback */
smp_wmb();
-#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
- synchronize_sched(); /* Until we have the call_rcu_sched() */
-#endif
- call_rcu(&entry->rcu, free_old_closure);
+ call_rcu_sched(&entry->rcu, free_old_closure);
remove_marker(name); /* Ignore busy error message */
ret = 0;
end:
@@ -786,7 +780,7 @@ int marker_probe_unregister_private_data
goto end;
}
if (entry->rcu_pending)
- rcu_barrier();
+ rcu_barrier_sched();
old = marker_entry_remove_probe(entry, NULL, probe_private);
mutex_unlock(&markers_mutex);
marker_update_probes(); /* may update entry */
@@ -797,10 +791,7 @@ int marker_probe_unregister_private_data
entry->rcu_pending = 1;
/* write rcu_pending before calling the RCU callback */
smp_wmb();
-#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
- synchronize_sched(); /* Until we have the call_rcu_sched() */
-#endif
- call_rcu(&entry->rcu, free_old_closure);
+ call_rcu_sched(&entry->rcu, free_old_closure);
remove_marker(entry->name); /* Ignore busy error message */
end:
mutex_unlock(&markers_mutex);
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca are
origin.patch
linux-next.patch
next reply other threads:[~2008-07-25 23:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-25 23:02 akpm [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-07-22 9:14 - markers-use-rcu_barrier_sched-and-call_rcu_sched.patch removed from -mm tree akpm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200807252302.m6PN2bTZ003840@imap1.linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox