From: akpm@linux-foundation.org
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux@dominikbrodowski.net, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk,
andi@firstfloor.org, andi@lisas.de, hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp,
johnstul@us.ibm.com, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: + acpi_pmc-check-for-monotonicity.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 13:16:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200808272016.m7RKGEDP020176@imap1.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
The patch titled
acpi_pm.c: check for monotonicity
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
acpi_pmc-check-for-monotonicity.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
See http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find
out what to do about this
The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: acpi_pm.c: check for monotonicity
From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
The current check for monotonicity is way too weak: Andreas Mohr reports (
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/10/77 ) that on one of his test systems the
current check only triggers in 50% of all cases, leading to catastrophic
timer behaviour. To fix this issue, expand the check for monotonicity by
doing ten consecutive tests instead of one.
Cc: John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Cc: Andreas Mohr <andi@lisas.de>
Cc: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
drivers/clocksource/acpi_pm.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff -puN drivers/clocksource/acpi_pm.c~acpi_pmc-check-for-monotonicity drivers/clocksource/acpi_pm.c
--- a/drivers/clocksource/acpi_pm.c~acpi_pmc-check-for-monotonicity
+++ a/drivers/clocksource/acpi_pm.c
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
#include <linux/errno.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/pci.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <asm/io.h>
/*
@@ -175,10 +176,13 @@ static int verify_pmtmr_rate(void)
#define verify_pmtmr_rate() (0)
#endif
+/* Number of monotonicity checks to perform during initialization */
+#define ACPI_PM_MONOTONICITY_CHECKS 10
+
static int __init init_acpi_pm_clocksource(void)
{
cycle_t value1, value2;
- unsigned int i;
+ unsigned int i, j, good = 0;
if (!pmtmr_ioport)
return -ENODEV;
@@ -187,24 +191,32 @@ static int __init init_acpi_pm_clocksour
clocksource_acpi_pm.shift);
/* "verify" this timing source: */
- value1 = clocksource_acpi_pm.read();
- for (i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
- value2 = clocksource_acpi_pm.read();
- if (value2 == value1)
- continue;
- if (value2 > value1)
- goto pm_good;
- if ((value2 < value1) && ((value2) < 0xFFF))
- goto pm_good;
- printk(KERN_INFO "PM-Timer had inconsistent results:"
- " 0x%#llx, 0x%#llx - aborting.\n", value1, value2);
- return -EINVAL;
+ for (j = 0; j < ACPI_PM_MONOTONICITY_CHECKS; j++) {
+ value1 = clocksource_acpi_pm.read();
+ for (i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
+ value2 = clocksource_acpi_pm.read();
+ if (value2 == value1)
+ continue;
+ if (value2 > value1)
+ good++;
+ break;
+ if ((value2 < value1) && ((value2) < 0xFFF))
+ good++;
+ break;
+ printk(KERN_INFO "PM-Timer had inconsistent results:"
+ " 0x%#llx, 0x%#llx - aborting.\n",
+ value1, value2);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ udelay(300 * i);
+ }
+
+ if (good != ACPI_PM_MONOTONICITY_CHECKS) {
+ printk(KERN_INFO "PM-Timer failed consistency check "
+ " (0x%#llx) - aborting.\n", value1);
+ return -ENODEV;
}
- printk(KERN_INFO "PM-Timer had no reasonable result:"
- " 0x%#llx - aborting.\n", value1);
- return -ENODEV;
-pm_good:
if (verify_pmtmr_rate() != 0)
return -ENODEV;
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from linux@dominikbrodowski.net are
linux-next.patch
pcmcia-pccard-deadlock-fix.patch
acpi_pmc-use-proper-read-function-also-in-errata-mode.patch
acpi_pmc-check-for-monotonicity.patch
make-sure-nobodys-leaking-resources.patch
next reply other threads:[~2008-08-27 20:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-27 20:16 akpm [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-08-18 20:23 + acpi_pmc-check-for-monotonicity.patch added to -mm tree akpm
2008-08-18 20:21 akpm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200808272016.m7RKGEDP020176@imap1.linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=andi@lisas.de \
--cc=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox