From: akpm@linux-foundation.org
To: fengguang.wu@intel.com, eparis@redhat.com, mm-commits@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [folded] vfs-o_-bit-numbers-uniqueness-check-fix-2.patch removed from -mm tree
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 11:41:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201004271908.o3RJ8VJ5014263@imap1.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
The patch titled
vfs: O_* bit numbers uniqueness check fix 2
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
vfs-o_-bit-numbers-uniqueness-check-fix-2.patch
This patch was dropped because it was folded into vfs-o_-bit-numbers-uniqueness-check.patch
The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: vfs: O_* bit numbers uniqueness check fix 2
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Follow the comment by Eric:
Until the FMODE_ and O_ bits do not overload I think we need to check
FMODE_EXEC and FMODE_NONOTIFY (if you have that one) inside fcntl_init()
as well. I guess I'll send a patch to someone ?Al? to add FMODE_EXEC to
the list....
Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
fs/fcntl.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff -puN fs/fcntl.c~vfs-o_-bit-numbers-uniqueness-check-fix-2 fs/fcntl.c
--- a/fs/fcntl.c~vfs-o_-bit-numbers-uniqueness-check-fix-2
+++ a/fs/fcntl.c
@@ -742,13 +742,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kill_fasync);
static int __init fcntl_init(void)
{
/* please add new bits here to ensure allocation uniqueness */
- BUILD_BUG_ON(18 - 1 /* for O_RDONLY being 0 */ != HWEIGHT32(
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(19 - 1 /* for O_RDONLY being 0 */ != HWEIGHT32(
O_RDONLY | O_WRONLY | O_RDWR |
O_CREAT | O_EXCL | O_NOCTTY |
O_TRUNC | O_APPEND | O_NONBLOCK |
__O_SYNC | O_DSYNC | FASYNC |
O_DIRECT | O_LARGEFILE | O_DIRECTORY |
- O_NOFOLLOW | O_NOATIME | O_CLOEXEC
+ O_NOFOLLOW | O_NOATIME | O_CLOEXEC |
+ FMODE_EXEC
));
fasync_cache = kmem_cache_create("fasync_cache",
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from fengguang.wu@intel.com are
linux-next.patch
include-linux-fsh-complete-hexification-of-fmode_-constants.patch
vfs-o_-bit-numbers-uniqueness-check.patch
vfs-o_-bit-numbers-uniqueness-check-fix-2.patch
vfs-introduce-fmode_neg_offset-for-allowing-negative-f_pos.patch
vmscan-prevent-get_scan_ratio-rounding-errors.patch
readaheadc-fix-comment.patch
fs-writeback-check-sync-bit-earlier-in-inode_wait_for_writeback.patch
vfs-add-super-operation-writeback_inodes.patch
reply other threads:[~2010-04-27 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201004271908.o3RJ8VJ5014263@imap1.linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox