From: akpm@linux-foundation.org
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: vapier@gentoo.org, David.Woodhouse@intel.com,
davidm@snapgear.com, dhowells@redhat.com, geert@linux-m68k.org,
gerg@uclinux.org, herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au,
jie@codesourcery.com, lethal@linux-sh.org, monstr@monstr.eu,
penberg@cs.helsinki.fi, takata@linux-m32r.org,
ysato@users.sourceforge.jp
Subject: + flat-tweak-default-stack-alignment.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 15:36:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201005282236.o4SMaRwq018448@imap1.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
The patch titled
fs/binfmt_flat.c: tweak default stack alignment
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
flat-tweak-default-stack-alignment.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
See http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find
out what to do about this
The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: fs/binfmt_flat.c: tweak default stack alignment
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
The recent commit 1f0ce8b3dd667dca7 ("mm: Move ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN and
ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN to <linux/slab_def.h>") which moved the
ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN default into the global header inadvertently broke FLAT
for a bunch of systems. Blackfin systems now fail on any FLAT exec with:
Unable to read code+data+bss, errno 14
When your /init is a FLAT binary, obviously this can be annoying ;).
This stems from the alignment usage in the FLAT loader. The behavior
before was that FLAT would default to ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN only if it was
defined, and this was only defined by arches when they wanted a larger
alignment value. Otherwise it'd default to pointer alignment. Arguably,
this is kind of hokey that the FLAT is semi-abusing defines it shouldn't.
But let's ignore that and simply ignore min alignment values of 0.
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Acked-by: David McCullough <davidm@snapgear.com>
Acked-by: Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>
Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
Cc: Hirokazu Takata <takata@linux-m32r.org>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Jie Zhang <jie@codesourcery.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
fs/binfmt_flat.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN fs/binfmt_flat.c~flat-tweak-default-stack-alignment fs/binfmt_flat.c
--- a/fs/binfmt_flat.c~flat-tweak-default-stack-alignment
+++ a/fs/binfmt_flat.c
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@
* Here we can be a bit looser than the data sections since this
* needs to only meet arch ABI requirements.
*/
-#ifdef ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN
+#if defined(ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN) && ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN != 0
#define FLAT_STACK_ALIGN (ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN)
#else
#define FLAT_STACK_ALIGN (sizeof(void *))
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from vapier@gentoo.org are
origin.patch
linux-next.patch
flat-split-the-stack-data-alignments.patch
flat-tweak-default-stack-alignment.patch
next reply other threads:[~2010-05-28 22:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-28 22:36 akpm [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-06-07 23:39 + flat-tweak-default-stack-alignment.patch added to -mm tree akpm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201005282236.o4SMaRwq018448@imap1.linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=David.Woodhouse@intel.com \
--cc=davidm@snapgear.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=gerg@uclinux.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au \
--cc=jie@codesourcery.com \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=takata@linux-m32r.org \
--cc=vapier@gentoo.org \
--cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox