From: akpm@linux-foundation.org
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dave@gnu.org, kobayashi.kk@ncos.nec.co.jp
Subject: + procfs-fix-proc-softirqs-formatting.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 16:00:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201008252300.o7PN0O8n020761@imap1.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
The patch titled
procfs: fix /proc/softirqs formatting
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
procfs-fix-proc-softirqs-formatting.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
See http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find
out what to do about this
The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: procfs: fix /proc/softirqs formatting
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@gnu.org>
The length of the BLOCK_IPOLL string is making i's value be printed too
far to the right. This patch fixes this and makes the output a bit
neater.
Currently:
CPU0
HI: 0
TIMER: 599792
NET_TX: 2
NET_RX: 6
BLOCK: 80807
BLOCK_IOPOLL: 0
TASKLET: 20012
SCHED: 0
HRTIMER: 63
RCU: 619279
With patch:
CPU0
HI: 0
TIMER: 585582
NET_TX: 2
NET_RX: 6
BLOCK: 80320
BLOCK_IOPOLL: 0
TASKLET: 19287
SCHED: 0
HRTIMER: 62
RCU: 604441
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@gnu.org>
Acked-by: Keika Kobayashi <kobayashi.kk@ncos.nec.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
fs/proc/softirqs.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff -puN fs/proc/softirqs.c~procfs-fix-proc-softirqs-formatting fs/proc/softirqs.c
--- a/fs/proc/softirqs.c~procfs-fix-proc-softirqs-formatting
+++ a/fs/proc/softirqs.c
@@ -10,13 +10,13 @@ static int show_softirqs(struct seq_file
{
int i, j;
- seq_printf(p, " ");
+ seq_printf(p, " ");
for_each_possible_cpu(i)
seq_printf(p, "CPU%-8d", i);
seq_printf(p, "\n");
for (i = 0; i < NR_SOFTIRQS; i++) {
- seq_printf(p, "%8s:", softirq_to_name[i]);
+ seq_printf(p, "%12s:", softirq_to_name[i]);
for_each_possible_cpu(j)
seq_printf(p, " %10u", kstat_softirqs_cpu(i, j));
seq_printf(p, "\n");
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from dave@gnu.org are
procfs-fix-proc-softirqs-formatting.patch
reply other threads:[~2010-08-25 23:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201008252300.o7PN0O8n020761@imap1.linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dave@gnu.org \
--cc=kobayashi.kk@ncos.nec.co.jp \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox