From: akpm@linux-foundation.org
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: James.Bottomley@suse.de, fengguang.wu@intel.com, jamie@shareable.org
Subject: + vfs-take-o_nonblock-out-of-the-o_-uniqueness-test.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 14:35:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201009072135.o87LZgOh007617@imap1.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
The patch titled
vfs: take O_NONBLOCK out of the O_* uniqueness test
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
vfs-take-o_nonblock-out-of-the-o_-uniqueness-test.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
See http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find
out what to do about this
The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: vfs: take O_NONBLOCK out of the O_* uniqueness test
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
DESC
vfs: take O_NONBLOCK out of the O_* uniqueness test
O_NONBLOCK on parisc has a dual value:
#define O_NONBLOCK 000200004 /* HPUX has separate NDELAY & NONBLOCK */
It is caught by the O_* bits uniqueness check and leads to a parisc
compile error. The fix would be to take O_NONBLOCK out.
Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
Cc: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
fs/fcntl.c | 10 +++++++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff -puN fs/fcntl.c~vfs-take-o_nonblock-out-of-the-o_-uniqueness-test fs/fcntl.c
--- a/fs/fcntl.c~vfs-take-o_nonblock-out-of-the-o_-uniqueness-test
+++ a/fs/fcntl.c
@@ -769,11 +769,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kill_fasync);
static int __init fcntl_init(void)
{
- /* please add new bits here to ensure allocation uniqueness */
- BUILD_BUG_ON(19 - 1 /* for O_RDONLY being 0 */ != HWEIGHT32(
+ /*
+ * Please add new bits here to ensure allocation uniqueness.
+ * Exceptions: O_NONBLOCK is a two bit define on parisc; O_NDELAY
+ * is defined as O_NONBLOCK on some platforms and not on others.
+ */
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(18 - 1 /* for O_RDONLY being 0 */ != HWEIGHT32(
O_RDONLY | O_WRONLY | O_RDWR |
O_CREAT | O_EXCL | O_NOCTTY |
- O_TRUNC | O_APPEND | O_NONBLOCK |
+ O_TRUNC | O_APPEND | /* O_NONBLOCK | */
__O_SYNC | O_DSYNC | FASYNC |
O_DIRECT | O_LARGEFILE | O_DIRECTORY |
O_NOFOLLOW | O_NOATIME | O_CLOEXEC |
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from James.Bottomley@suse.de are
linux-next.patch
vfs-take-o_nonblock-out-of-the-o_-uniqueness-test.patch
reply other threads:[~2010-09-07 21:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201009072135.o87LZgOh007617@imap1.linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@suse.de \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox