From: akpm@linux-foundation.org
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, fengguang.wu@intel.com,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com,
mel@csn.ul.ie, minchan.kim@gmail.com, riel@redhat.com
Subject: + vmscan-narrow-the-scenarios-lumpy-reclaim-uses-synchrounous-reclaim.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 15:28:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201009162228.o8GMSZDP017343@imap1.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
The patch titled
vmscan: narrow the scenarios in whcih lumpy reclaim uses synchrounous reclaim
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
vmscan-narrow-the-scenarios-lumpy-reclaim-uses-synchrounous-reclaim.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
See http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find
out what to do about this
The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: vmscan: narrow the scenarios in whcih lumpy reclaim uses synchrounous reclaim
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
shrink_page_list() can decide to give up reclaiming a page under a
number of conditions such as
1. trylock_page() failure
2. page is unevictable
3. zone reclaim and page is mapped
4. PageWriteback() is true
5. page is swapbacked and swap is full
6. add_to_swap() failure
7. page is dirty and gfpmask don't have GFP_IO, GFP_FS
8. page is pinned
9. IO queue is congested
10. pageout() start IO, but not finished
With lumpy reclaim, failures result in entering synchronous lumpy reclaim
but this can be unnecessary. In cases (2), (3), (5), (6), (7) and (8),
there is no point retrying. This patch causes lumpy reclaim to abort when
it is known it will fail.
Case (9) is more interesting. current behavior is,
1. start shrink_page_list(async)
2. found queue_congested()
3. skip pageout write
4. still start shrink_page_list(sync)
5. wait on a lot of pages
6. again, found queue_congested()
7. give up pageout write again
So, it's useless time wasting. However, just skipping page reclaim is
also notgood as x86 allocating a huge page needs 512 pages for example.
It can have more dirty pages than queue congestion threshold (~=128).
After this patch, pageout() behaves as follows;
- If order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
Ignore queue congestion always.
- If order <= PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
skip write page and disable lumpy reclaim.
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
include/trace/events/vmscan.h | 6 -
mm/vmscan.c | 120 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
2 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
diff -puN include/trace/events/vmscan.h~vmscan-narrow-the-scenarios-lumpy-reclaim-uses-synchrounous-reclaim include/trace/events/vmscan.h
--- a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h~vmscan-narrow-the-scenarios-lumpy-reclaim-uses-synchrounous-reclaim
+++ a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
@@ -25,13 +25,13 @@
#define trace_reclaim_flags(page, sync) ( \
(page_is_file_cache(page) ? RECLAIM_WB_FILE : RECLAIM_WB_ANON) | \
- (sync == PAGEOUT_IO_SYNC ? RECLAIM_WB_SYNC : RECLAIM_WB_ASYNC) \
+ (sync == LUMPY_MODE_SYNC ? RECLAIM_WB_SYNC : RECLAIM_WB_ASYNC) \
)
#define trace_shrink_flags(file, sync) ( \
- (sync == PAGEOUT_IO_SYNC ? RECLAIM_WB_MIXED : \
+ (sync == LUMPY_MODE_SYNC ? RECLAIM_WB_MIXED : \
(file ? RECLAIM_WB_FILE : RECLAIM_WB_ANON)) | \
- (sync == PAGEOUT_IO_SYNC ? RECLAIM_WB_SYNC : RECLAIM_WB_ASYNC) \
+ (sync == LUMPY_MODE_SYNC ? RECLAIM_WB_SYNC : RECLAIM_WB_ASYNC) \
)
TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_kswapd_sleep,
diff -puN mm/vmscan.c~vmscan-narrow-the-scenarios-lumpy-reclaim-uses-synchrounous-reclaim mm/vmscan.c
--- a/mm/vmscan.c~vmscan-narrow-the-scenarios-lumpy-reclaim-uses-synchrounous-reclaim
+++ a/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -51,6 +51,12 @@
#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
#include <trace/events/vmscan.h>
+enum lumpy_mode {
+ LUMPY_MODE_NONE,
+ LUMPY_MODE_ASYNC,
+ LUMPY_MODE_SYNC,
+};
+
struct scan_control {
/* Incremented by the number of inactive pages that were scanned */
unsigned long nr_scanned;
@@ -82,7 +88,7 @@ struct scan_control {
* Intend to reclaim enough continuous memory rather than reclaim
* enough amount of memory. i.e, mode for high order allocation.
*/
- bool lumpy_reclaim_mode;
+ enum lumpy_mode lumpy_reclaim_mode;
/* Which cgroup do we reclaim from */
struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup;
@@ -265,6 +271,36 @@ unsigned long shrink_slab(unsigned long
return ret;
}
+static void set_lumpy_reclaim_mode(int priority, struct scan_control *sc,
+ bool sync)
+{
+ enum lumpy_mode mode = sync ? LUMPY_MODE_SYNC : LUMPY_MODE_ASYNC;
+
+ /*
+ * Some reclaim have alredy been failed. No worth to try synchronous
+ * lumpy reclaim.
+ */
+ if (sync && sc->lumpy_reclaim_mode == LUMPY_MODE_NONE)
+ return;
+
+ /*
+ * If we need a large contiguous chunk of memory, or have
+ * trouble getting a small set of contiguous pages, we
+ * will reclaim both active and inactive pages.
+ */
+ if (sc->order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER)
+ sc->lumpy_reclaim_mode = mode;
+ else if (sc->order && priority < DEF_PRIORITY - 2)
+ sc->lumpy_reclaim_mode = mode;
+ else
+ sc->lumpy_reclaim_mode = LUMPY_MODE_NONE;
+}
+
+static void disable_lumpy_reclaim_mode(struct scan_control *sc)
+{
+ sc->lumpy_reclaim_mode = LUMPY_MODE_NONE;
+}
+
static inline int is_page_cache_freeable(struct page *page)
{
/*
@@ -275,7 +311,8 @@ static inline int is_page_cache_freeable
return page_count(page) - page_has_private(page) == 2;
}
-static int may_write_to_queue(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
+static int may_write_to_queue(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
+ struct scan_control *sc)
{
if (current->flags & PF_SWAPWRITE)
return 1;
@@ -283,6 +320,10 @@ static int may_write_to_queue(struct bac
return 1;
if (bdi == current->backing_dev_info)
return 1;
+
+ /* lumpy reclaim for hugepage often need a lot of write */
+ if (sc->order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER)
+ return 1;
return 0;
}
@@ -307,12 +348,6 @@ static void handle_write_error(struct ad
unlock_page(page);
}
-/* Request for sync pageout. */
-enum pageout_io {
- PAGEOUT_IO_ASYNC,
- PAGEOUT_IO_SYNC,
-};
-
/* possible outcome of pageout() */
typedef enum {
/* failed to write page out, page is locked */
@@ -330,7 +365,7 @@ typedef enum {
* Calls ->writepage().
*/
static pageout_t pageout(struct page *page, struct address_space *mapping,
- enum pageout_io sync_writeback)
+ struct scan_control *sc)
{
/*
* If the page is dirty, only perform writeback if that write
@@ -366,8 +401,10 @@ static pageout_t pageout(struct page *pa
}
if (mapping->a_ops->writepage == NULL)
return PAGE_ACTIVATE;
- if (!may_write_to_queue(mapping->backing_dev_info))
+ if (!may_write_to_queue(mapping->backing_dev_info, sc)) {
+ disable_lumpy_reclaim_mode(sc);
return PAGE_KEEP;
+ }
if (clear_page_dirty_for_io(page)) {
int res;
@@ -393,7 +430,8 @@ static pageout_t pageout(struct page *pa
* direct reclaiming a large contiguous area and the
* first attempt to free a range of pages fails.
*/
- if (PageWriteback(page) && sync_writeback == PAGEOUT_IO_SYNC)
+ if (PageWriteback(page) &&
+ sc->lumpy_reclaim_mode == LUMPY_MODE_SYNC)
wait_on_page_writeback(page);
if (!PageWriteback(page)) {
@@ -401,7 +439,7 @@ static pageout_t pageout(struct page *pa
ClearPageReclaim(page);
}
trace_mm_vmscan_writepage(page,
- trace_reclaim_flags(page, sync_writeback));
+ trace_reclaim_flags(page, sc->lumpy_reclaim_mode));
inc_zone_page_state(page, NR_VMSCAN_WRITE);
return PAGE_SUCCESS;
}
@@ -579,7 +617,7 @@ static enum page_references page_check_r
referenced_page = TestClearPageReferenced(page);
/* Lumpy reclaim - ignore references */
- if (sc->lumpy_reclaim_mode)
+ if (sc->lumpy_reclaim_mode != LUMPY_MODE_NONE)
return PAGEREF_RECLAIM;
/*
@@ -643,8 +681,7 @@ static noinline_for_stack void free_page
* shrink_page_list() returns the number of reclaimed pages
*/
static unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list,
- struct scan_control *sc,
- enum pageout_io sync_writeback)
+ struct scan_control *sc)
{
LIST_HEAD(ret_pages);
LIST_HEAD(free_pages);
@@ -693,10 +730,13 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(st
* for any page for which writeback has already
* started.
*/
- if (sync_writeback == PAGEOUT_IO_SYNC && may_enter_fs)
+ if (sc->lumpy_reclaim_mode == LUMPY_MODE_SYNC &&
+ may_enter_fs)
wait_on_page_writeback(page);
- else
- goto keep_locked;
+ else {
+ unlock_page(page);
+ goto keep_lumpy;
+ }
}
references = page_check_references(page, sc);
@@ -750,14 +790,17 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(st
goto keep_locked;
/* Page is dirty, try to write it out here */
- switch (pageout(page, mapping, sync_writeback)) {
+ switch (pageout(page, mapping, sc)) {
case PAGE_KEEP:
goto keep_locked;
case PAGE_ACTIVATE:
goto activate_locked;
case PAGE_SUCCESS:
- if (PageWriteback(page) || PageDirty(page))
+ if (PageWriteback(page))
+ goto keep_lumpy;
+ if (PageDirty(page))
goto keep;
+
/*
* A synchronous write - probably a ramdisk. Go
* ahead and try to reclaim the page.
@@ -840,6 +883,7 @@ cull_mlocked:
try_to_free_swap(page);
unlock_page(page);
putback_lru_page(page);
+ disable_lumpy_reclaim_mode(sc);
continue;
activate_locked:
@@ -852,6 +896,8 @@ activate_locked:
keep_locked:
unlock_page(page);
keep:
+ disable_lumpy_reclaim_mode(sc);
+keep_lumpy:
list_add(&page->lru, &ret_pages);
VM_BUG_ON(PageLRU(page) || PageUnevictable(page));
}
@@ -1252,7 +1298,7 @@ static inline bool should_reclaim_stall(
return false;
/* Only stall on lumpy reclaim */
- if (!sc->lumpy_reclaim_mode)
+ if (sc->lumpy_reclaim_mode == LUMPY_MODE_NONE)
return false;
/* If we have relaimed everything on the isolated list, no stall */
@@ -1297,15 +1343,15 @@ shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to
return SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX;
}
-
+ set_lumpy_reclaim_mode(priority, sc, false);
lru_add_drain();
spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
if (scanning_global_lru(sc)) {
nr_taken = isolate_pages_global(nr_to_scan,
&page_list, &nr_scanned, sc->order,
- sc->lumpy_reclaim_mode ?
- ISOLATE_BOTH : ISOLATE_INACTIVE,
+ sc->lumpy_reclaim_mode == LUMPY_MODE_NONE ?
+ ISOLATE_INACTIVE : ISOLATE_BOTH,
zone, 0, file);
zone->pages_scanned += nr_scanned;
if (current_is_kswapd())
@@ -1317,8 +1363,8 @@ shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to
} else {
nr_taken = mem_cgroup_isolate_pages(nr_to_scan,
&page_list, &nr_scanned, sc->order,
- sc->lumpy_reclaim_mode ?
- ISOLATE_BOTH : ISOLATE_INACTIVE,
+ sc->lumpy_reclaim_mode == LUMPY_MODE_NONE ?
+ ISOLATE_INACTIVE : ISOLATE_BOTH,
zone, sc->mem_cgroup,
0, file);
/*
@@ -1336,7 +1382,7 @@ shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to
spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
- nr_reclaimed = shrink_page_list(&page_list, sc, PAGEOUT_IO_ASYNC);
+ nr_reclaimed = shrink_page_list(&page_list, sc);
/* Check if we should syncronously wait for writeback */
if (should_reclaim_stall(nr_taken, nr_reclaimed, priority, sc)) {
@@ -1347,7 +1393,8 @@ shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to
nr_active = clear_active_flags(&page_list, NULL);
count_vm_events(PGDEACTIVATE, nr_active);
- nr_reclaimed += shrink_page_list(&page_list, sc, PAGEOUT_IO_SYNC);
+ set_lumpy_reclaim_mode(priority, sc, true);
+ nr_reclaimed += shrink_page_list(&page_list, sc);
}
local_irq_disable();
@@ -1739,21 +1786,6 @@ out:
}
}
-static void set_lumpy_reclaim_mode(int priority, struct scan_control *sc)
-{
- /*
- * If we need a large contiguous chunk of memory, or have
- * trouble getting a small set of contiguous pages, we
- * will reclaim both active and inactive pages.
- */
- if (sc->order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER)
- sc->lumpy_reclaim_mode = 1;
- else if (sc->order && priority < DEF_PRIORITY - 2)
- sc->lumpy_reclaim_mode = 1;
- else
- sc->lumpy_reclaim_mode = 0;
-}
-
/*
* This is a basic per-zone page freer. Used by both kswapd and direct reclaim.
*/
@@ -1768,8 +1800,6 @@ static void shrink_zone(int priority, st
get_scan_count(zone, sc, nr, priority);
- set_lumpy_reclaim_mode(priority, sc);
-
while (nr[LRU_INACTIVE_ANON] || nr[LRU_ACTIVE_FILE] ||
nr[LRU_INACTIVE_FILE]) {
for_each_evictable_lru(l) {
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com are
oom-always-return-a-badness-score-of-non-zero-for-eligible-tasks.patch
linux-next.patch
vmscan-check-all_unreclaimable-in-direct-reclaim-path.patch
vmscan-check-all_unreclaimable-in-direct-reclaim-path-v2.patch
proc-pid-smaps-fix-dirty-pages-accounting.patch
proc-pid-smaps-export-amount-of-anonymous-memory-in-a-mapping.patch
oom-filter-unkillable-tasks-from-tasklist-dump.patch
security-add-const-to-security_task_setscheduler.patch
sched-make-sched_param-argument-static-variables-in-some-sched_setscheduler-caller.patch
oom-add-per-mm-oom-disable-count.patch
oom-avoid-killing-a-task-if-a-thread-sharing-its-mm-cannot-be-killed.patch
oom-kill-all-threads-sharing-oom-killed-tasks-mm.patch
oom-kill-all-threads-sharing-oom-killed-tasks-mm-fix.patch
oom-kill-all-threads-sharing-oom-killed-tasks-mm-fix-fix.patch
oom-rewrite-error-handling-for-oom_adj-and-oom_score_adj-tunables.patch
oom-fix-locking-for-oom_adj-and-oom_score_adj.patch
mm-only-build-per-node-scan_unevictable-functions-when-numa-is-enabled.patch
vmscan-prevent-background-aging-of-anon-page-in-no-swap-system.patch
mm-mempolicy-check-return-code-of-check_range.patch
mm-add-account_page_writeback.patch
writeback-add-nr_dirtied-and-nr_written-to-proc-vmstat.patch
writeback-add-nr_dirtied-and-nr_written-to-proc-vmstat-update.patch
writeback-add-sys-devices-system-node-node-vmstat.patch
writeback-add-sys-devices-system-node-node-vmstat-update.patch
writeback-report-dirty-thresholds-in-proc-vmstat.patch
vmscan-delete-dead-code.patch
tracing-vmscan-add-trace-events-for-lru-list-shrinking.patch
writeback-account-for-time-spent-congestion_waited.patch
vmscan-synchronous-lumpy-reclaim-should-not-call-congestion_wait.patch
vmscan-narrow-the-scenarios-lumpy-reclaim-uses-synchrounous-reclaim.patch
vmscan-remove-dead-code-in-shrink_inactive_list.patch
vmscan-isolated_lru_pages-stop-neighbour-search-if-neighbour-cannot-be-isolated.patch
writeback-do-not-sleep-on-the-congestion-queue-if-there-are-no-congested-bdis.patch
writeback-do-not-sleep-on-the-congestion-queue-if-there-are-no-congested-bdis-or-if-significant-congestion-is-not-being-encountered-in-the-current-zone.patch
core_pattern-fix-long-parameters-was-truncated-by-core_pattern-handler.patch
core_pattern-fix-long-parameters-was-truncated-by-core_pattern-handler-update.patch
core_pattern-fix-long-parameters-was-truncated-by-core_pattern-handler-update-2.patch
reiser4.patch
reply other threads:[~2010-09-16 22:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201009162228.o8GMSZDP017343@imap1.linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox