From: akpm@linux-foundation.org
To: cl@linux.com, guro@fb.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com,
jnwang@linux.alibaba.com, khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru,
mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, penberg@kernel.org,
rientjes@google.com, sming56@gmail.com, vbabka@suse.cz,
wenyang@linux.alibaba.com, willy@infradead.org,
xlpang@linux.alibaba.com
Subject: [nacked] mm-slub-use-percpu-partial-free-counter.patch removed from -mm tree
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 16:11:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210315231128.UeWDuqBQN%akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
The patch titled
Subject: mm/slub: use percpu partial free counter
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mm-slub-use-percpu-partial-free-counter.patch
This patch was dropped because it was nacked
------------------------------------------------------
From: Xunlei Pang <xlpang@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: mm/slub: use percpu partial free counter
The only concern of introducing partial counter is that, partial_free_objs
may cause cache and atomic operation contention in case of same SLUB
concurrent __slab_free().
This patch changes it to be a percpu counter, also replace the counter
variables to avoid cacheline issues.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1615303512-35058-5-git-send-email-xlpang@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Xunlei Pang <xlpang@linux.alibaba.com>
Tested-by: James Wang <jnwang@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Shu Ming <sming56@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Wen Yang <wenyang@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
mm/slab.h | 6 ++++--
mm/slub.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------
2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/slab.h~mm-slub-use-percpu-partial-free-counter
+++ a/mm/slab.h
@@ -546,16 +546,18 @@ struct kmem_cache_node {
#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB
unsigned long nr_partial;
- struct list_head partial;
#if defined(CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG) || defined(CONFIG_SYSFS)
- atomic_long_t partial_free_objs;
unsigned long partial_total_objs;
#endif
+ struct list_head partial;
#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG
atomic_long_t nr_slabs;
atomic_long_t total_objects;
struct list_head full;
#endif
+#if defined(CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG) || defined(CONFIG_SYSFS)
+ unsigned long __percpu *partial_free_objs;
+#endif
#endif
};
--- a/mm/slub.c~mm-slub-use-percpu-partial-free-counter
+++ a/mm/slub.c
@@ -1894,7 +1894,7 @@ static void discard_slab(struct kmem_cac
static inline void
__update_partial_free(struct kmem_cache_node *n, long delta)
{
- atomic_long_add(delta, &n->partial_free_objs);
+ this_cpu_add(*n->partial_free_objs, delta);
}
static inline void
@@ -2548,11 +2548,16 @@ static unsigned long partial_counter(str
unsigned long ret = 0;
if (item == PARTIAL_FREE) {
- ret = atomic_long_read(&n->partial_free_objs);
+ ret = per_cpu_sum(*n->partial_free_objs);
+ if ((long)ret < 0)
+ ret = 0;
} else if (item == PARTIAL_TOTAL) {
ret = n->partial_total_objs;
} else if (item == PARTIAL_INUSE) {
- ret = n->partial_total_objs - atomic_long_read(&n->partial_free_objs);
+ ret = per_cpu_sum(*n->partial_free_objs);
+ if ((long)ret < 0)
+ ret = 0;
+ ret = n->partial_total_objs - ret;
if ((long)ret < 0)
ret = 0;
}
@@ -3552,14 +3557,16 @@ static inline int calculate_order(unsign
return -ENOSYS;
}
-static void
+static int
init_kmem_cache_node(struct kmem_cache_node *n)
{
n->nr_partial = 0;
spin_lock_init(&n->list_lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&n->partial);
#if defined(CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG) || defined(CONFIG_SYSFS)
- atomic_long_set(&n->partial_free_objs, 0);
+ n->partial_free_objs = alloc_percpu(unsigned long);
+ if (!n->partial_free_objs)
+ return -ENOMEM;
n->partial_total_objs = 0;
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG
@@ -3567,6 +3574,8 @@ init_kmem_cache_node(struct kmem_cache_n
atomic_long_set(&n->total_objects, 0);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&n->full);
#endif
+
+ return 0;
}
static inline int alloc_kmem_cache_cpus(struct kmem_cache *s)
@@ -3626,7 +3635,7 @@ static void early_kmem_cache_node_alloc(
page->inuse = 1;
page->frozen = 0;
kmem_cache_node->node[node] = n;
- init_kmem_cache_node(n);
+ BUG_ON(init_kmem_cache_node(n) < 0);
inc_slabs_node(kmem_cache_node, node, page->objects);
/*
@@ -3644,6 +3653,9 @@ static void free_kmem_cache_nodes(struct
for_each_kmem_cache_node(s, node, n) {
s->node[node] = NULL;
+#if defined(CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG) || defined(CONFIG_SYSFS)
+ free_percpu(n->partial_free_objs);
+#endif
kmem_cache_free(kmem_cache_node, n);
}
}
@@ -3674,7 +3686,11 @@ static int init_kmem_cache_nodes(struct
return 0;
}
- init_kmem_cache_node(n);
+ if (init_kmem_cache_node(n) < 0) {
+ free_kmem_cache_nodes(s);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
s->node[node] = n;
}
return 1;
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from xlpang@linux.alibaba.com are
reply other threads:[~2021-03-15 23:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210315231128.UeWDuqBQN%akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=jnwang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=sming56@gmail.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=wenyang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=xlpang@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox