[merged mm-hotfixes-stable] mm-huge_memory-preserve-pg_has_hwpoisoned-if-a-folio-is-split-to-0-order.patch removed from -mm tree

[merged mm-hotfixes-stable] mm-huge_memory-preserve-pg_has_hwpoisoned-if-a-folio-is-split-to-0-order.patch removed from -mm tree

[Andrew Morton]

The quilt patch titled
     Subject: mm/huge_memory: preserve PG_has_hwpoisoned if a folio is split to >0 order
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     mm-huge_memory-preserve-pg_has_hwpoisoned-if-a-folio-is-split-to-0-order.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-hotfixes-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

------------------------------------------------------
From: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Subject: mm/huge_memory: preserve PG_has_hwpoisoned if a folio is split to >0 order
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 23:05:21 -0400

folio split clears PG_has_hwpoisoned, but the flag should be preserved in
after-split folios containing pages with PG_hwpoisoned flag if the folio
is split to >0 order folios.  Scan all pages in a to-be-split folio to
determine which after-split folios need the flag.

An alternatives is to change PG_has_hwpoisoned to PG_maybe_hwpoisoned to
avoid the scan and set it on all after-split folios, but resulting false
positive has undesirable negative impact.  To remove false positive,
caller of folio_test_has_hwpoisoned() and folio_contain_hwpoisoned_page()
needs to do the scan.  That might be causing a hassle for current and
future callers and more costly than doing the scan in the split code. 
More details are discussed in [1].

This issue can be exposed via:
1. splitting a has_hwpoisoned folio to >0 order from debugfs interface;
2. truncating part of a has_hwpoisoned folio in
   truncate_inode_partial_folio().

And later accesses to a hwpoisoned page could be possible due to the
missing has_hwpoisoned folio flag.  This will lead to MCE errors.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHbLzkoOZm0PXxE9qwtF4gKR=cpRXrSrJ9V9Pm2DJexs985q4g@mail.gmail.com/ [1]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20251023030521.473097-1-ziy@nvidia.com
Fixes: c010d47f107f ("mm: thp: split huge page to any lower order pages")
Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Yang Shi <yang@os.amperecomputing.com>
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Cc: Pankaj Raghav <kernel@pankajraghav.com>
Cc: Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>
Cc: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
Cc: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>
Cc: Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@oracle.com>
Cc: Luis Chamberalin <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <nao.horiguchi@gmail.com>
Cc: Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com>
Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 mm/huge_memory.c |   23 ++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/huge_memory.c~mm-huge_memory-preserve-pg_has_hwpoisoned-if-a-folio-is-split-to-0-order
+++ a/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -3263,6 +3263,14 @@ bool can_split_folio(struct folio *folio
 					caller_pins;
 }
 
+static bool page_range_has_hwpoisoned(struct page *page, long nr_pages)
+{
+	for (; nr_pages; page++, nr_pages--)
+		if (PageHWPoison(page))
+			return true;
+	return false;
+}
+
 /*
  * It splits @folio into @new_order folios and copies the @folio metadata to
  * all the resulting folios.
@@ -3270,17 +3278,24 @@ bool can_split_folio(struct folio *folio
 static void __split_folio_to_order(struct folio *folio, int old_order,
 		int new_order)
 {
+	/* Scan poisoned pages when split a poisoned folio to large folios */
+	const bool handle_hwpoison = folio_test_has_hwpoisoned(folio) && new_order;
 	long new_nr_pages = 1 << new_order;
 	long nr_pages = 1 << old_order;
 	long i;
 
+	folio_clear_has_hwpoisoned(folio);
+
+	/* Check first new_nr_pages since the loop below skips them */
+	if (handle_hwpoison &&
+	    page_range_has_hwpoisoned(folio_page(folio, 0), new_nr_pages))
+		folio_set_has_hwpoisoned(folio);
 	/*
 	 * Skip the first new_nr_pages, since the new folio from them have all
 	 * the flags from the original folio.
 	 */
 	for (i = new_nr_pages; i < nr_pages; i += new_nr_pages) {
 		struct page *new_head = &folio->page + i;
-
 		/*
 		 * Careful: new_folio is not a "real" folio before we cleared PageTail.
 		 * Don't pass it around before clear_compound_head().
@@ -3322,6 +3337,10 @@ static void __split_folio_to_order(struc
 				 (1L << PG_dirty) |
 				 LRU_GEN_MASK | LRU_REFS_MASK));
 
+		if (handle_hwpoison &&
+		    page_range_has_hwpoisoned(new_head, new_nr_pages))
+			folio_set_has_hwpoisoned(new_folio);
+
 		new_folio->mapping = folio->mapping;
 		new_folio->index = folio->index + i;
 
@@ -3422,8 +3441,6 @@ static int __split_unmapped_folio(struct
 	if (folio_test_anon(folio))
 		mod_mthp_stat(order, MTHP_STAT_NR_ANON, -1);
 
-	folio_clear_has_hwpoisoned(folio);
-
 	/*
 	 * split to new_order one order at a time. For uniform split,
 	 * folio is split to new_order directly.
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from ziy@nvidia.com are

mm-huge_memory-fix-folio-split-check-for-anon-folios-in-swapcache.patch
mm-huge_memory-add-split_huge_page_to_order.patch
mm-memory-failure-improve-large-block-size-folio-handling.patch
mm-huge_memory-fix-kernel-doc-comments-for-folio_split-and-related.patch
mm-huge_memory-fix-kernel-doc-comments-for-folio_split-and-related-fix.patch
mm-huge_memory-fix-kernel-doc-comments-for-folio_split-and-related-fix-2.patch
migrate-optimise-alloc_migration_target-fix.patch