public inbox for mm-commits@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com,yuanchu@google.com,yosry@kernel.org,weixugc@google.com,shikemeng@huaweicloud.com,shakeel.butt@linux.dev,roman.gushchin@linux.dev,rientjes@google.com,nphamcs@gmail.com,muchun.song@linux.dev,mhocko@suse.com,ljs@kernel.org,kasong@tencent.com,joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com,hannes@cmpxchg.org,david@kernel.org,chrisl@kernel.org,bhe@redhat.com,baohua@kernel.org,axelrasmussen@google.com,bingjiao@google.com,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [merged mm-stable] mm-memcontrol-fix-reclaim_options-leak-in-try_charge_memcg.patch removed from -mm tree
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2026 17:42:47 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260329004247.A7E8BC4CEF7@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)


The quilt patch titled
     Subject: mm/memcontrol: fix reclaim_options leak in try_charge_memcg()
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     mm-memcontrol-fix-reclaim_options-leak-in-try_charge_memcg.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

------------------------------------------------------
From: Bing Jiao <bingjiao@google.com>
Subject: mm/memcontrol: fix reclaim_options leak in try_charge_memcg()
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2026 03:34:13 +0000

In try_charge_memcg(), the 'reclaim_options' variable is initialized once
at the start of the function.  However, the function contains a retry
loop.  If reclaim_options were modified during an iteration (e.g., by
encountering a memsw limit), the modified state would persist into
subsequent retries.

This leads to incorrect reclaim behavior.  Specifically,
MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP is cleared when the combined memcg->memsw limit is
reached.  After reclaimation attempts, a subsequent retry may successfully
charge memcg->memsw but fail on the memcg->memory charge.  In this case,
swapping should be permitted, but the carried-over state prevents it.

This issue was identified during code reading of try_charge_memcg() while
analyzing memsw limit behavior in tiered-memory systems; no production
failures have been reported yet.

Fix by moving the initialization of 'reclaim_options' inside the retry
loop, ensuring a clean state for every reclaim attempt.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20260321033500.2558070-1-bingjiao@google.com
Fixes: 6539cc053869 ("mm: memcontrol: fold mem_cgroup_do_charge()")
Signed-off-by: Bing Jiao <bingjiao@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosry@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>
Cc: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>
Cc: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
Cc: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle) <ljs@kernel.org>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Cc: Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>
Cc: Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 mm/memcontrol.c |    3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/mm/memcontrol.c~mm-memcontrol-fix-reclaim_options-leak-in-try_charge_memcg
+++ a/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -2385,7 +2385,7 @@ static int try_charge_memcg(struct mem_c
 	struct page_counter *counter;
 	unsigned long nr_reclaimed;
 	bool passed_oom = false;
-	unsigned int reclaim_options = MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP;
+	unsigned int reclaim_options;
 	bool drained = false;
 	bool raised_max_event = false;
 	unsigned long pflags;
@@ -2399,6 +2399,7 @@ retry:
 		/* Avoid the refill and flush of the older stock */
 		batch = nr_pages;
 
+	reclaim_options = MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP;
 	if (!do_memsw_account() ||
 	    page_counter_try_charge(&memcg->memsw, batch, &counter)) {
 		if (page_counter_try_charge(&memcg->memory, batch, &counter))
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from bingjiao@google.com are



                 reply	other threads:[~2026-03-29  0:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260329004247.A7E8BC4CEF7@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=bingjiao@google.com \
    --cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
    --cc=kasong@tencent.com \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=weixugc@google.com \
    --cc=yosry@kernel.org \
    --cc=yuanchu@google.com \
    --cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox