From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,pmladek@suse.com,kees@kernel.org,dhowells@redhat.com,davidgow@google.com,lk@c--e.de,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [merged mm-nonmm-stable] lib-kunit_iov_iter-add-tests-for-extract_iter_to_sg.patch removed from -mm tree
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2026 23:42:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260403064233.2A6A3C4CEF7@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
The quilt patch titled
Subject: lib: kunit_iov_iter: add tests for extract_iter_to_sg
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
lib-kunit_iov_iter-add-tests-for-extract_iter_to_sg.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-nonmm-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
------------------------------------------------------
From: "Christian A. Ehrhardt" <lk@c--e.de>
Subject: lib: kunit_iov_iter: add tests for extract_iter_to_sg
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2026 22:49:05 +0100
Add test cases that test extract_iter_to_sg.
For each iterator type an iterator is loaded with a suitable buffer. The
iterator is then extracted to a scatterlist with multiple calls to
extract_iter_to_sg. The final scatterlist is copied into a scratch
buffer.
The test passes if the scratch buffer contains the same data as the
original buffer.
The new tests demonstrate bugs in extract_iter_to_sg for kvec and user
iterators that are fixed by the previous commits.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20260326214905.818170-6-lk@c--e.de
Signed-off-by: Christian A. Ehrhardt <lk@c--e.de>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
lib/tests/kunit_iov_iter.c | 203 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 203 insertions(+)
--- a/lib/tests/kunit_iov_iter.c~lib-kunit_iov_iter-add-tests-for-extract_iter_to_sg
+++ a/lib/tests/kunit_iov_iter.c
@@ -13,7 +13,9 @@
#include <linux/uio.h>
#include <linux/bvec.h>
#include <linux/folio_queue.h>
+#include <linux/scatterlist.h>
#include <linux/minmax.h>
+#include <linux/mman.h>
#include <kunit/test.h>
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("iov_iter testing");
@@ -1016,6 +1018,202 @@ stop:
KUNIT_SUCCEED(test);
}
+struct iov_kunit_iter_to_sg_data {
+ struct sg_table *sgt;
+ u8 *buffer, *scratch;
+ u8 __user *ubuf;
+ struct page **pages;
+ size_t npages;
+};
+
+static void __init
+iov_kunit_iter_unpin_sgt(void *data)
+{
+ struct sg_table *sgt = data;
+
+ for (unsigned int i = 0; i < sgt->nents; ++i)
+ unpin_user_page(sg_page(&sgt->sgl[i]));
+}
+
+static void __init
+iov_kunit_iter_to_sg_init(struct kunit *test, size_t bufsize, bool user,
+ struct iov_kunit_iter_to_sg_data *data)
+{
+ struct page **spages;
+ struct scatterlist *sg;
+ unsigned long uaddr;
+ size_t i;
+
+ data->npages = bufsize / PAGE_SIZE;
+ sg = kunit_kmalloc_array(test, data->npages, sizeof(*sg), GFP_KERNEL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, sg);
+ sg_init_table(sg, data->npages);
+ data->sgt = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*data->sgt), GFP_KERNEL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, data->sgt);
+ data->sgt->orig_nents = 0;
+ data->sgt->sgl = sg;
+
+ data->buffer = NULL;
+ data->ubuf = NULL;
+ if (user) {
+ uaddr = kunit_vm_mmap(test, NULL, 0, bufsize,
+ PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
+ MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE, 0);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NE(test, uaddr, 0);
+ data->ubuf = (u8 __user *)uaddr;
+ for (i = 0; i < bufsize; ++i)
+ put_user(pattern(i), data->ubuf + i);
+ } else {
+ data->buffer = iov_kunit_create_buffer(test, &data->pages,
+ data->npages);
+ for (i = 0; i < bufsize; ++i)
+ data->buffer[i] = pattern(i);
+ }
+ data->scratch = iov_kunit_create_buffer(test, &spages, data->npages);
+ memset(data->scratch, 0, bufsize);
+}
+
+static void __init
+iov_kunit_iter_to_sg_check(struct kunit *test, struct iov_iter *iter,
+ size_t bufsize,
+ struct iov_kunit_iter_to_sg_data *data)
+{
+ static const size_t tail = 16 * PAGE_SIZE;
+ size_t i;
+
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_LT(test, tail, bufsize);
+
+ if (iov_iter_extract_will_pin(iter))
+ kunit_add_action_or_reset(test, iov_kunit_iter_unpin_sgt,
+ data->sgt);
+
+ i = extract_iter_to_sg(iter, bufsize, data->sgt, 0, 0);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, i, 0);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, data->sgt->nents, 0);
+
+ i = extract_iter_to_sg(iter, bufsize - tail, data->sgt, 1, 0);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_LE(test, i, bufsize - tail);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, data->sgt->nents, 1);
+
+ i += extract_iter_to_sg(iter, bufsize - tail - i, data->sgt,
+ data->npages - data->sgt->nents, 0);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, i, bufsize - tail);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_LE(test, data->sgt->nents, data->npages);
+
+ i += extract_iter_to_sg(iter, tail, data->sgt,
+ data->npages - data->sgt->nents, 0);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, i, bufsize);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_LE(test, data->sgt->nents, data->npages);
+
+ sg_mark_end(&data->sgt->sgl[data->sgt->nents - 1]);
+
+ i = sg_copy_to_buffer(data->sgt->sgl, data->sgt->nents,
+ data->scratch, bufsize);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, i, bufsize);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < bufsize; ++i) {
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, data->scratch[i], pattern(i),
+ "at i=%zx", i);
+ if (data->scratch[i] != pattern(i))
+ break;
+ }
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, bufsize);
+}
+
+static void __init iov_kunit_iter_to_sg_kvec(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct iov_kunit_iter_to_sg_data data;
+ struct iov_iter iter;
+ struct kvec kvec;
+ size_t bufsize;
+
+ bufsize = 0x100000;
+ iov_kunit_iter_to_sg_init(test, bufsize, false, &data);
+
+ kvec.iov_base = data.buffer;
+ kvec.iov_len = bufsize;
+ iov_iter_kvec(&iter, READ, &kvec, 1, bufsize);
+
+ iov_kunit_iter_to_sg_check(test, &iter, bufsize, &data);
+}
+
+static void __init iov_kunit_iter_to_sg_bvec(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct iov_kunit_iter_to_sg_data data;
+ struct page *p, *can_merge = NULL;
+ size_t i, k, bufsize;
+ struct bio_vec *bvec;
+ struct iov_iter iter;
+
+ bufsize = 0x100000;
+ iov_kunit_iter_to_sg_init(test, bufsize, false, &data);
+
+ bvec = kunit_kmalloc_array(test, data.npages, sizeof(*bvec),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, bvec);
+ k = 0;
+ for (i = 0; i < data.npages; ++i) {
+ p = data.pages[i];
+ if (p == can_merge)
+ bvec[k-1].bv_len += PAGE_SIZE;
+ else
+ bvec_set_page(&bvec[k++], p, PAGE_SIZE, 0);
+ can_merge = p + 1;
+ }
+ iov_iter_bvec(&iter, READ, bvec, k, bufsize);
+
+ iov_kunit_iter_to_sg_check(test, &iter, bufsize, &data);
+}
+
+static void __init iov_kunit_iter_to_sg_folioq(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct iov_kunit_iter_to_sg_data data;
+ struct folio_queue *folioq;
+ struct iov_iter iter;
+ size_t bufsize;
+
+ bufsize = 0x100000;
+ iov_kunit_iter_to_sg_init(test, bufsize, false, &data);
+
+ folioq = iov_kunit_create_folioq(test);
+ iov_kunit_load_folioq(test, &iter, READ, folioq, data.pages,
+ data.npages);
+
+ iov_kunit_iter_to_sg_check(test, &iter, bufsize, &data);
+}
+
+static void __init iov_kunit_iter_to_sg_xarray(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct iov_kunit_iter_to_sg_data data;
+ struct xarray *xarray;
+ struct iov_iter iter;
+ size_t bufsize;
+
+ bufsize = 0x100000;
+ iov_kunit_iter_to_sg_init(test, bufsize, false, &data);
+
+ xarray = iov_kunit_create_xarray(test);
+ iov_kunit_load_xarray(test, &iter, READ, xarray, data.pages,
+ data.npages);
+
+ iov_kunit_iter_to_sg_check(test, &iter, bufsize, &data);
+}
+
+static void __init iov_kunit_iter_to_sg_ubuf(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct iov_kunit_iter_to_sg_data data;
+ struct iov_iter iter;
+ size_t bufsize;
+
+ bufsize = 0x100000;
+ iov_kunit_iter_to_sg_init(test, bufsize, true, &data);
+
+ iov_iter_ubuf(&iter, READ, data.ubuf, bufsize);
+
+ iov_kunit_iter_to_sg_check(test, &iter, bufsize, &data);
+}
+
static struct kunit_case __refdata iov_kunit_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(iov_kunit_copy_to_kvec),
KUNIT_CASE(iov_kunit_copy_from_kvec),
@@ -1029,6 +1227,11 @@ static struct kunit_case __refdata iov_k
KUNIT_CASE(iov_kunit_extract_pages_bvec),
KUNIT_CASE(iov_kunit_extract_pages_folioq),
KUNIT_CASE(iov_kunit_extract_pages_xarray),
+ KUNIT_CASE(iov_kunit_iter_to_sg_kvec),
+ KUNIT_CASE(iov_kunit_iter_to_sg_bvec),
+ KUNIT_CASE(iov_kunit_iter_to_sg_folioq),
+ KUNIT_CASE(iov_kunit_iter_to_sg_xarray),
+ KUNIT_CASE(iov_kunit_iter_to_sg_ubuf),
{}
};
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from lk@c--e.de are
reply other threads:[~2026-04-03 6:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260403064233.2A6A3C4CEF7@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=lk@c--e.de \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox