From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,ye.liu@linux.dev,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [to-be-updated] mm-page_owner-clamp-skip_buddy_pages-pfn-advance-at-max_order_nr_pages-boundary.patch removed from -mm tree
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 20:36:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260701033617.A35AF1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
The quilt patch titled
Subject: mm/page_owner: clamp skip_buddy_pages() PFN advance at MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES boundary
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mm-page_owner-clamp-skip_buddy_pages-pfn-advance-at-max_order_nr_pages-boundary.patch
This patch was dropped because an updated version will be issued
------------------------------------------------------
From: Ye Liu <ye.liu@linux.dev>
Subject: mm/page_owner: clamp skip_buddy_pages() PFN advance at MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES boundary
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2026 09:47:04 +0800
Patch series "mm/page_owner: fix TOCTOU races in lockless page state
reading".
Fix two TOCTOU races found during review of [1].
page_owner reads page state locklessly by design. In two places the code
reads the same metadata twice once as a guard, then again as a use and the
page can be concurrently reallocated between the two:
Patch 1: buddy_order_unsafe() in skip_buddy_pages() can return garbage if
the page is allocated between PageBuddy() and the private read, causing
the PFN to skip past a pfn_valid() boundary. Clamp the advance at
MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES.
Patch 2: PageMemcgKmem() in print_page_owner_memcg() re-reads
folio->memcg_data and triggers VM_BUG_ON assertions if the page became a
tail page or slab page. Use the snapshot taken at entry.
This patch (of 2):
The lockless buddy_order_unsafe() read can return a garbage order value if
the page is concurrently allocated between the PageBuddy check and the
private read. If this bogus order is <= MAX_PAGE_ORDER,
skip_buddy_pages() would arbitrarily advance the PFN, potentially jumping
past a MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES boundary whose pfn_valid() check would have
caught an offline memory section.
In read_page_owner(), which relies solely on boundary-aligned pfn_valid()
to guard pfn_to_page(), skipping the boundary could cause pfn_to_page() to
access an unmapped mem_section.
Clamp the advance so it never crosses the next MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES
boundary. This is safe for all three callers: the pageblock-iterating
ones already handle boundary transitions in their outer loops, and for
read_page_owner() the worst case is one extra PageBuddy check per 1024
pages for a huge buddy block straddling the boundary.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260625014708.87386-1-ye.liu@linux.dev
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260625014708.87386-2-ye.liu@linux.dev
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260623065234.31866-2-ye.liu@linux.dev/ [1]
Link: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260623065234.31866-2-ye.liu@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Ye Liu <ye.liu@linux.dev>
Cc: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
mm/page_owner.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/page_owner.c~mm-page_owner-clamp-skip_buddy_pages-pfn-advance-at-max_order_nr_pages-boundary
+++ a/mm/page_owner.c
@@ -428,6 +428,12 @@ void __folio_copy_owner(struct folio *ne
* to skip less than the full buddy block, but that is acceptable for page owner
* iteration purposes.
*
+ * The lockless read of buddy_order_unsafe() can also return a garbage order if
+ * the page is concurrently allocated and PageBuddy is cleared between the check
+ * and the read. Clamp the advance at the next MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES boundary so
+ * that a bogus order cannot carry @pfn into an unvalidated memory section,
+ * which would break callers that rely on boundary-aligned pfn_valid() checks.
+ *
* Return: true if the page was skipped (caller should continue its loop),
* false if the page is not a buddy page and should be processed normally.
*/
@@ -439,8 +445,12 @@ static inline bool skip_buddy_pages(unsi
return false;
order = buddy_order_unsafe(page);
- if (order <= MAX_PAGE_ORDER)
- *pfn += (1UL << order) - 1;
+ if (order <= MAX_PAGE_ORDER) {
+ unsigned long new_pfn = *pfn + (1UL << order);
+ unsigned long boundary = ALIGN(*pfn + 1, MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES);
+
+ *pfn = min(new_pfn, boundary) - 1;
+ }
return true;
}
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from ye.liu@linux.dev are
a.patch
mm-page_owner-use-memcg_data-snapshot-instead-of-pagememcgkmem-to-avoid-toctou-vm_bug_on.patch
reply other threads:[~2026-07-01 3:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260701033617.A35AF1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ye.liu@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox