Linux MM tree latest commits
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,ye.liu@linux.dev,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [to-be-updated] mm-page_owner-clamp-skip_buddy_pages-pfn-advance-at-max_order_nr_pages-boundary.patch removed from -mm tree
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 20:36:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260701033617.A35AF1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)


The quilt patch titled
     Subject: mm/page_owner: clamp skip_buddy_pages() PFN advance at MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES boundary
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     mm-page_owner-clamp-skip_buddy_pages-pfn-advance-at-max_order_nr_pages-boundary.patch

This patch was dropped because an updated version will be issued

------------------------------------------------------
From: Ye Liu <ye.liu@linux.dev>
Subject: mm/page_owner: clamp skip_buddy_pages() PFN advance at MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES boundary
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2026 09:47:04 +0800

Patch series "mm/page_owner: fix TOCTOU races in lockless page state
reading".

Fix two TOCTOU races found during review of [1].

page_owner reads page state locklessly by design.  In two places the code
reads the same metadata twice once as a guard, then again as a use and the
page can be concurrently reallocated between the two:

Patch 1: buddy_order_unsafe() in skip_buddy_pages() can return garbage if
the page is allocated between PageBuddy() and the private read, causing
the PFN to skip past a pfn_valid() boundary.  Clamp the advance at
MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES.

Patch 2: PageMemcgKmem() in print_page_owner_memcg() re-reads
folio->memcg_data and triggers VM_BUG_ON assertions if the page became a
tail page or slab page.  Use the snapshot taken at entry.


This patch (of 2):

The lockless buddy_order_unsafe() read can return a garbage order value if
the page is concurrently allocated between the PageBuddy check and the
private read.  If this bogus order is <= MAX_PAGE_ORDER,
skip_buddy_pages() would arbitrarily advance the PFN, potentially jumping
past a MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES boundary whose pfn_valid() check would have
caught an offline memory section.

In read_page_owner(), which relies solely on boundary-aligned pfn_valid()
to guard pfn_to_page(), skipping the boundary could cause pfn_to_page() to
access an unmapped mem_section.

Clamp the advance so it never crosses the next MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES
boundary.  This is safe for all three callers: the pageblock-iterating
ones already handle boundary transitions in their outer loops, and for
read_page_owner() the worst case is one extra PageBuddy check per 1024
pages for a huge buddy block straddling the boundary.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260625014708.87386-1-ye.liu@linux.dev
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260625014708.87386-2-ye.liu@linux.dev
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260623065234.31866-2-ye.liu@linux.dev/ [1]
Link: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260623065234.31866-2-ye.liu@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Ye Liu <ye.liu@linux.dev>
Cc: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 mm/page_owner.c |   14 ++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/page_owner.c~mm-page_owner-clamp-skip_buddy_pages-pfn-advance-at-max_order_nr_pages-boundary
+++ a/mm/page_owner.c
@@ -428,6 +428,12 @@ void __folio_copy_owner(struct folio *ne
  * to skip less than the full buddy block, but that is acceptable for page owner
  * iteration purposes.
  *
+ * The lockless read of buddy_order_unsafe() can also return a garbage order if
+ * the page is concurrently allocated and PageBuddy is cleared between the check
+ * and the read. Clamp the advance at the next MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES boundary so
+ * that a bogus order cannot carry @pfn into an unvalidated memory section,
+ * which would break callers that rely on boundary-aligned pfn_valid() checks.
+ *
  * Return: true if the page was skipped (caller should continue its loop),
  *         false if the page is not a buddy page and should be processed normally.
  */
@@ -439,8 +445,12 @@ static inline bool skip_buddy_pages(unsi
 		return false;
 
 	order = buddy_order_unsafe(page);
-	if (order <= MAX_PAGE_ORDER)
-		*pfn += (1UL << order) - 1;
+	if (order <= MAX_PAGE_ORDER) {
+		unsigned long new_pfn = *pfn + (1UL << order);
+		unsigned long boundary = ALIGN(*pfn + 1, MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES);
+
+		*pfn = min(new_pfn, boundary) - 1;
+	}
 
 	return true;
 }
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from ye.liu@linux.dev are

a.patch
mm-page_owner-use-memcg_data-snapshot-instead-of-pagememcgkmem-to-avoid-toctou-vm_bug_on.patch


                 reply	other threads:[~2026-07-01  3:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260701033617.A35AF1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ye.liu@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox