From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,ebiggers@kernel.org,hch@lst.de,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: + raid6-kunit-add-a-benchmark.patch added to mm-nonmm-unstable branch
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 11:20:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260715182100.0D4AB1F00AC4@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
The patch titled
Subject: raid6/kunit: add a benchmark
has been added to the -mm mm-nonmm-unstable branch. Its filename is
raid6-kunit-add-a-benchmark.patch
This patch will shortly appear at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/raid6-kunit-add-a-benchmark.patch
This patch will later appear in the mm-nonmm-unstable branch at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next via various
branches at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there most days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: raid6/kunit: add a benchmark
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 16:47:39 +0200
Add a benchmark to test the RAID 6 P/Q functions for more representative
block sizes and numbers of disks. This splits the maximum alloc size used
for the benchmark from the max size for the kunit test because recovery is
currently limited to a single page at a time. Hopefully this will be
fixed soon.
The runtime numbers are reported in GB/s as the numbers of modern
implementations are basically unreadable as MB/s. This means
retro-architectures could report 0, but that is an easy tradeoff.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260715144825.95432-9-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
lib/raid/Kconfig | 6 ++
lib/raid/raid6/tests/raid6_kunit.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/lib/raid/Kconfig~raid6-kunit-add-a-benchmark
+++ a/lib/raid/Kconfig
@@ -60,6 +60,12 @@ config RAID6_PQ_KUNIT_TEST
This is intended to help people writing architecture-specific
optimized versions. If unsure, say N.
+config RAID6_PQ_KUNIT_BENCHMARK
+ bool "Benchmark for RAID6 PQ"
+ depends on RAID6_PQ_KUNIT_TEST
+ help
+ Include benchmarks in the KUnit test suite for raid P/Q generation.
+
config RAID6_PQ_BENCHMARK
bool "Automatically choose fastest RAID6 PQ functions"
depends on RAID6_PQ
--- a/lib/raid/raid6/tests/raid6_kunit.c~raid6-kunit-add-a-benchmark
+++ a/lib/raid/raid6/tests/raid6_kunit.c
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ MODULE_IMPORT_NS("EXPORTED_FOR_KUNIT_TES
#define RAID6_KUNIT_MAX_BUFFERS 64 /* Including P and Q */
#define RAID6_KUNIT_MAX_FAILURES 2
#define RAID6_KUNIT_MAX_BYTES PAGE_SIZE
+#define RAID6_KUNIT_ALLOC_BYTES SZ_16K
static struct rnd_state rng;
static void *test_buffers[RAID6_KUNIT_MAX_BUFFERS];
@@ -229,6 +230,68 @@ static void raid6_test(struct kunit *tes
raid6_test_one(test);
}
+static void raid6_benchmark(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ static const unsigned int nr_to_test[] = {
+ 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, 15, 16, 32,
+ };
+ static const unsigned int len_to_test[] = {
+ SZ_4K, SZ_16K,
+ };
+ unsigned int i, j, l;
+ u64 t;
+
+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RAID6_PQ_KUNIT_BENCHMARK))
+ kunit_skip(test, "not enabled");
+
+ /* warm-up */
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(nr_to_test); i++) {
+ for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(len_to_test); j++) {
+ for (l = 0; l < 10; l++) {
+ raid6_gen_syndrome(nr_to_test[i],
+ len_to_test[j], test_buffers);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Preferably this would be a loop over len_to_test, but the kunit
+ * logging always adds a newline to each logged format string.
+ */
+ static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(len_to_test) == 2);
+ kunit_info(test, " \t%5u bytes\t%5u bytes\n",
+ len_to_test[0], len_to_test[1]);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(nr_to_test); i++) {
+ unsigned int nr = nr_to_test[i];
+ u64 speed[ARRAY_SIZE(len_to_test)];
+
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_LE(test, nr, RAID6_KUNIT_MAX_BUFFERS);
+
+ for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(len_to_test); j++) {
+ unsigned int len = len_to_test[j];
+ const unsigned long num_iters = 1000;
+
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, len, 0);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_LE(test, len, RAID6_KUNIT_ALLOC_BYTES);
+
+ preempt_disable();
+ t = ktime_get_ns();
+ for (l = 0; l < num_iters; l++)
+ raid6_gen_syndrome(nr_to_test[i],
+ len_to_test[j], test_buffers);
+ t = max(ktime_get_ns() - t, 1);
+ preempt_enable();
+
+ speed[j] = div64_u64((u64)len * num_iters * nr, t);
+ }
+
+ static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(len_to_test) == 2);
+ kunit_info(test, "%3u disks:\t%5llu GB/s\t%5llu GB/s\n",
+ nr, speed[0], speed[1]);
+ }
+}
+
static const void *raid6_gen_params(struct kunit *test, const void *prev,
char *desc)
{
@@ -256,6 +319,7 @@ next_algo:
static struct kunit_case raid6_test_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(raid6_test, raid6_gen_params),
+ KUNIT_CASE(raid6_benchmark),
{},
};
@@ -270,7 +334,7 @@ static int raid6_suite_init(struct kunit
* so that it is immediately followed by a guard page. This allows
* buffer overreads to be detected, even in assembly code.
*/
- test_buflen = round_up(RAID6_KUNIT_MAX_BYTES, PAGE_SIZE);
+ test_buflen = round_up(RAID6_KUNIT_ALLOC_BYTES, PAGE_SIZE);
for (i = 0; i < RAID6_KUNIT_MAX_FAILURES; i++) {
test_recov_buffers[i] = vmalloc(test_buflen);
if (!test_recov_buffers[i])
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from hch@lst.de are
mm-remove-wb_writeout_inc.patch
shmem-provide-a-shmem_write_folio-wrapper.patch
mm-swap-introduce-struct-swap_io_ctx.patch
mm-swap-also-use-struct-swap_iocb-for-block-i-o.patch
mm-swap-remove-count_swpout_vm_event.patch
mm-swap-use-swap_ops-to-register-swap-devices-methods.patch
mm-swap-remove-swp_fs_ops.patch
mm-vmstat-add-nrswpinout-counters.patch
xor-enable-lock-context-analysis.patch
xor-improve-the-runtime-selection-benchmark.patch
xor-kunit-fix-a-spelling-error.patch
xor-kunit-add-a-benchmark.patch
raid6-enable-lock-context-analysis.patch
raid6-defer-implementation-selection-when-built-in.patch
raid6-improve-the-runtime-selection-benchmark.patch
raid6-kunit-add-a-benchmark.patch
reply other threads:[~2026-07-15 18:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260715182100.0D4AB1F00AC4@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox