From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,ljs@kernel.org,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: + mm-mseal-remove-superfluous-comments-fix-confusion-around-mm.patch added to mm-new branch
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 12:40:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260717194013.31F5B1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
The patch titled
Subject: mm/mseal: remove superfluous comments, fix confusion around mm
has been added to the -mm mm-new branch. Its filename is
mm-mseal-remove-superfluous-comments-fix-confusion-around-mm.patch
This patch will shortly appear at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/mm-mseal-remove-superfluous-comments-fix-confusion-around-mm.patch
This patch will later appear in the mm-new branch at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
Note, mm-new is a provisional staging ground for work-in-progress
patches, and acceptance into mm-new is a notification for others take
notice and to finish up reviews. Please do not hesitate to respond to
review feedback and post updated versions to replace or incrementally
fixup patches in mm-new.
The mm-new branch of mm.git is not included in linux-next
If a few days of testing in mm-new is successful, the patch will me moved
into mm.git's mm-unstable branch, which is included in linux-next
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next via various
branches at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there most days
------------------------------------------------------
From: "Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" <ljs@kernel.org>
Subject: mm/mseal: remove superfluous comments, fix confusion around mm
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 18:27:09 +0100
Patch series "mm/mseal: further cleanups", v2.
The mseal implementation is still rather confusing, so tighten things up a
little.
The only user of do_mseal() outside of the system call is the
MMAP_PAGE_ZERO process personality - retain better control over how mseal
is utilised by providing mseal_mmap_page_zero() for this instead.
The comments are overly long and confusion, so cut them down so they're a
lot clearer.
Remove confusing mm_struct params (mseal can not be used on remote mm's)
and wrap the actual system call logic into the system call declaration.
This patch (of 3):
Remove comment blocks that don't add value and eliminate any confusion
about whether or not we permit mseal()'ing of remote mm's by not passing
through an mm parameter but rather referencing current->mm in each
function.
Also while we're here, avoid an ugly goto by using an else branch, and
move local parameters declarations into reverse xmas tree order.
No functional change intended.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260717-mseal-fixups-v2-0-0daa0014b813@kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260717-mseal-fixups-v2-1-0daa0014b813@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <ljs@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Cc: Liam R. Howlett <liam@infradead.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
mm/mseal.c | 53 ++++++++++-----------------------------------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/mseal.c~mm-mseal-remove-superfluous-comments-fix-confusion-around-mm
+++ a/mm/mseal.c
@@ -16,32 +16,11 @@
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include "internal.h"
-/*
- * mseal() disallows an input range which contain unmapped ranges (VMA holes).
- *
- * It disallows unmapped regions from start to end whether they exist at the
- * start, in the middle, or at the end of the range, or any combination thereof.
- *
- * This is because after sealing a range, there's nothing to stop memory mapping
- * of ranges in the remaining gaps later, meaning that the user might then
- * wrongly consider the entirety of the mseal()'d range to be sealed when it
- * in fact isn't.
- */
-
-/*
- * Does the [start, end) range contain any unmapped memory?
- *
- * We ensure that:
- * - start is part of a valid VMA.
- * - end is part of a valid VMA.
- * - no gap (unallocated memory) exists between start and end.
- */
-static bool range_contains_unmapped(struct mm_struct *mm,
- unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
+static bool range_contains_unmapped(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
{
- struct vm_area_struct *vma;
- unsigned long prev_end = start;
VMA_ITERATOR(vmi, current->mm, start);
+ unsigned long prev_end = start;
+ struct vm_area_struct *vma;
for_each_vma_range(vmi, vma, end) {
if (vma->vm_start > prev_end)
@@ -53,11 +32,10 @@ static bool range_contains_unmapped(stru
return prev_end < end;
}
-static int mseal_apply(struct mm_struct *mm,
- unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
+static int mseal_apply(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
{
+ VMA_ITERATOR(vmi, current->mm, start);
struct vm_area_struct *vma, *prev;
- VMA_ITERATOR(vmi, mm, start);
/* We know there are no gaps so this will be non-NULL. */
vma = vma_iter_load(&vmi);
@@ -142,10 +120,10 @@ static int mseal_apply(struct mm_struct
*/
int do_mseal(unsigned long start, size_t len_in, unsigned long flags)
{
- size_t len;
- int ret = 0;
- unsigned long end;
struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
+ unsigned long end;
+ int ret = 0;
+ size_t len;
/* Verify flags not set. */
if (flags)
@@ -170,20 +148,11 @@ int do_mseal(unsigned long start, size_t
if (mmap_write_lock_killable(mm))
return -EINTR;
- if (range_contains_unmapped(mm, start, end)) {
+ if (range_contains_unmapped(start, end))
ret = -ENOMEM;
- goto out;
- }
-
- /*
- * Second pass, this should success, unless there are errors
- * from vma_modify_flags, e.g. merge/split error, or process
- * reaching the max supported VMAs, however, those cases shall
- * be rare.
- */
- ret = mseal_apply(mm, start, end);
+ else
+ ret = mseal_apply(start, end);
-out:
mmap_write_unlock(mm);
return ret;
}
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from ljs@kernel.org are
mm-vmalloc-acquire-init_mm-lock-on-huge-vmap-to-avoid-ptdump-uaf.patch
x86-mm-pat-acquire-init_mm-write-lock-on-collapse-to-avoid-uaf.patch
x86-mm-pat-acquire-init_mm-read-lock-on-attribute-change-to-avoid-uaf.patch
mm-ptdump-always-stabilise-against-page-table-freeing-using-init_mm.patch
arm64-remove-redundant-concurrent-ptdump-uaf-mitigation.patch
mm-move-alloc-tag-to-mm.patch
mm-move-vma_start_pgoff-into-mmh-and-clean-up.patch
mm-add-kdoc-comments-for-vma_start-last_pgoff.patch
tools-testing-vma-use-vma_start_pgoff-in-merge-tests.patch
mm-introduce-and-use-vma_end_pgoff.patch
mm-rmap-update-mm-interval_treec-comments.patch
mm-rmap-parameterise-vma_interval_tree_-by-address_space.patch
mm-rmap-elide-unnecessary-static-inlines-in-interval_treec.patch
mm-rmap-rename-vma_interval_tree_-to-mapping_rmap_tree_.patch
mm-rmap-parameterise-anon_vma_interval_tree_-by-anon_vma.patch
mm-rmap-rename-anon_vma_interval_tree_-params-and-use-pgoff_t.patch
mm-rmap-rename-anon_vma_interval_tree_-to-anon_rmap_tree_.patch
maintainers-move-mm-interval_treec-to-rmap-section.patch
mm-vma-introduce-and-use-vmg_pages-vmg__pgoff.patch
mm-vma-clean-up-anon_vma_compatible.patch
mm-vma-refactor-vmg_adjust_set_range-for-clarity.patch
mm-vma-minor-cleanup-of-expand_.patch
mm-introduce-and-use-linear_page_delta.patch
mm-vma-use-vma_start_pgoff-linear_page_index-in-mm-code.patch
mm-prefer-vma__pgoff-to-vma-vm_pgoff-in-kernel.patch
mm-vma-remove-duplicative-vma_pgoff_offset-helper.patch
mm-use-linear_page_-consistently.patch
mm-vma-introduce-vma_assert_can_modify.patch
mm-vma-add-and-use-vma__pgoff.patch
mm-vma-move-__install_special_mapping-to-vmac.patch
mm-vma-make-vma_set_range-static-drop-insert_vm_struct-decl.patch
mm-vma-update-vma_shrink-to-not-pass-start-pgoff-parameters.patch
mm-vma-update-vmg_adjust_set_range-to-offset-pgoff-instead.patch
mm-vma-slightly-rework-the-anonymous-check-in-__mmap_new_vma.patch
mm-vma-introduce-and-use-vma_set_pgoff.patch
mm-vma-correct-incorrect-vmah-inclusion.patch
mm-vma-use-guard-clauses-in-can_vma_merge_.patch
tools-testing-vma-default-vma-mm-flag-bits-to-64-bit.patch
tools-testing-vma-output-compared-expression-on-assert_.patch
mm-introduce-vma_flags_can_grow-and-vma_can_grow.patch
mm-vma-update-do_mmap-to-use-vma_flags_t.patch
mm-convert-__get_unmapped_area-to-use-vma_flags_t.patch
mm-update-generic_get_unmapped_area-to-use-vma_flags_t.patch
mm-prefer-mm-def_vma_flags-in-mm-logic.patch
mm-vma-convert-vm_pgprot_modify-to-use-vma_flags_t-and-rename.patch
mm-vma-rename-vma_get_page_prot-to-vma_flags_to_page_prot.patch
mm-introduce-vma_get_page_prot-and-use-it.patch
mm-vma-update-create_init_stack_vma-to-use-vma_flags_t.patch
mm-vma-convert-miscellaneous-uses-of-vma-flags-in-core-mm.patch
mm-mlock-convert-mlock-code-to-use-vma_flags_t.patch
mm-mprotect-convert-mprotect-code-to-use-vma_flags_t.patch
mm-mremap-convert-mremap-code-to-use-vma_flags_t.patch
mm-mseal-remove-superfluous-comments-fix-confusion-around-mm.patch
mm-mseal-limit-scope-of-mseal-address-zero-to-address-zero.patch
mm-mseal-remove-further-superfluous-comments-do_mseal.patch
next reply other threads:[~2026-07-17 19:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-17 19:40 Andrew Morton [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-07-17 0:26 + mm-mseal-remove-superfluous-comments-fix-confusion-around-mm.patch added to mm-new branch Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260717194013.31F5B1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox