From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,stable@vger.kernel.org,piaojun@huawei.com,mark@fasheh.com,kees@kernel.org,junxiao.bi@oracle.com,joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com,jlbec@evilplan.org,heming.zhao@suse.com,gechangwei@live.cn,doruk@0sec.ai,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: + ocfs2-validate-directory-index-entry-counts-when-reading-metadata.patch added to mm-nonmm-unstable branch
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2026 22:32:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260720053233.516FE1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
The patch titled
Subject: ocfs2: validate directory-index entry counts when reading metadata
has been added to the -mm mm-nonmm-unstable branch. Its filename is
ocfs2-validate-directory-index-entry-counts-when-reading-metadata.patch
This patch will shortly appear at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/ocfs2-validate-directory-index-entry-counts-when-reading-metadata.patch
This patch will later appear in the mm-nonmm-unstable branch at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next via various
branches at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there most days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Doruk Tan Ozturk <doruk@0sec.ai>
Subject: ocfs2: validate directory-index entry counts when reading metadata
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 22:56:25 +0200
ocfs2_validate_dx_leaf() and ocfs2_validate_dx_root() check the ECC and
signature of an indexed-directory block before it reaches higher-level
callers, but neither validator bounds the ocfs2_dx_entry_list counts
against the capacity of the block that holds them.
ocfs2_dx_dir_search() then walks
for (i = 0; i < le16_to_cpu(entry_list->de_num_used); i++)
dx_entry = &entry_list->de_entries[i];
over de_num_used entries with no bounds check. entry_list is either
dx_leaf->dl_list (from ocfs2_read_dx_leaf) or, for an inline root,
dx_root->dr_entries. A crafted on-disk image can set de_num_used (and
de_count, which is the __counted_by_le() bound of de_entries) to 0xffff
and make the walk read far past the end of the 4KB metadata block, giving
a slab out-of-bounds read reachable from any path lookup, stat() or open()
on an indexed directory once the image is mounted.
Commit 775c17386a6f ("ocfs2: validate dx_root extent list fields during
block read") already bounds dr_list for the non-inline dx_root, but left
the inline dr_entries path and the dx_leaf dl_list unchecked. Add the
same read-time validation for both entry lists: de_count must equal the
capacity of the block (ocfs2_dx_entries_per_leaf()/per_root()) and
de_num_used must not exceed de_count, rejecting corrupted metadata with
-EFSCORRUPTED before ocfs2_dx_dir_search() can walk an out-of-range entry
array.
de_count is always written as exactly the block capacity when a leaf or
inline root is formatted, so the equality check does not reject any valid
image.
Found by 0sec automated security-research tooling (https://0sec.ai).
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260713205625.92391-1-doruk@0sec.ai
Fixes: 9b7895efac90 ("ocfs2: Add a name indexed b-tree to directory inodes")
Fixes: 4ed8a6bb083b ("ocfs2: Store dir index records inline")
Assisted-by: 0sec:claude-opus-4-8
Signed-off-by: Doruk Tan Ozturk <doruk@0sec.ai>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>
Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Cc: Changwei Ge <gechangwei@live.cn>
Cc: Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com>
Cc: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@suse.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
fs/ocfs2/dir.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c~ocfs2-validate-directory-index-entry-counts-when-reading-metadata
+++ a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
@@ -625,6 +625,28 @@ static int ocfs2_validate_dx_root(struct
le16_to_cpu(el->l_count));
goto bail;
}
+ } else {
+ struct ocfs2_dx_entry_list *dl_list = &dx_root->dr_entries;
+
+ if (le16_to_cpu(dl_list->de_count) !=
+ ocfs2_dx_entries_per_root(sb)) {
+ ret = ocfs2_error(sb,
+ "Dir Index Root # %llu has invalid de_count %u (expected %u)\n",
+ (unsigned long long)le64_to_cpu(dx_root->dr_blkno),
+ le16_to_cpu(dl_list->de_count),
+ ocfs2_dx_entries_per_root(sb));
+ goto bail;
+ }
+
+ if (le16_to_cpu(dl_list->de_num_used) >
+ le16_to_cpu(dl_list->de_count)) {
+ ret = ocfs2_error(sb,
+ "Dir Index Root # %llu has invalid de_num_used %u (de_count %u)\n",
+ (unsigned long long)le64_to_cpu(dx_root->dr_blkno),
+ le16_to_cpu(dl_list->de_num_used),
+ le16_to_cpu(dl_list->de_count));
+ goto bail;
+ }
}
bail:
@@ -664,10 +686,25 @@ static int ocfs2_validate_dx_leaf(struct
return ret;
}
- if (!OCFS2_IS_VALID_DX_LEAF(dx_leaf)) {
- ret = ocfs2_error(sb, "Dir Index Leaf has bad signature %.*s\n",
- 7, dx_leaf->dl_signature);
- }
+ if (!OCFS2_IS_VALID_DX_LEAF(dx_leaf))
+ return ocfs2_error(sb, "Dir Index Leaf has bad signature %.*s\n",
+ 7, dx_leaf->dl_signature);
+
+ if (le16_to_cpu(dx_leaf->dl_list.de_count) !=
+ ocfs2_dx_entries_per_leaf(sb))
+ return ocfs2_error(sb,
+ "Dir Index Leaf # %llu has invalid de_count %u (expected %u)\n",
+ (unsigned long long)le64_to_cpu(dx_leaf->dl_blkno),
+ le16_to_cpu(dx_leaf->dl_list.de_count),
+ ocfs2_dx_entries_per_leaf(sb));
+
+ if (le16_to_cpu(dx_leaf->dl_list.de_num_used) >
+ le16_to_cpu(dx_leaf->dl_list.de_count))
+ return ocfs2_error(sb,
+ "Dir Index Leaf # %llu has invalid de_num_used %u (de_count %u)\n",
+ (unsigned long long)le64_to_cpu(dx_leaf->dl_blkno),
+ le16_to_cpu(dx_leaf->dl_list.de_num_used),
+ le16_to_cpu(dx_leaf->dl_list.de_count));
return ret;
}
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from doruk@0sec.ai are
ocfs2-validate-directory-index-entry-counts-when-reading-metadata.patch
reply other threads:[~2026-07-20 5:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260720053233.516FE1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=doruk@0sec.ai \
--cc=gechangwei@live.cn \
--cc=heming.zhao@suse.com \
--cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
--cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=junxiao.bi@oracle.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=mark@fasheh.com \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=piaojun@huawei.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox