From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,tangzw515@gmail.com,stable@vger.kernel.org,piaojun@huawei.com,mark@fasheh.com,junxiao.bi@oracle.com,jlbec@evilplan.org,heming.zhao@suse.com,gechangwei@live.cn,joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: + ocfs2-skip-uninitialized-lockres-in-ocfs2_mark_lockres_freeing.patch added to mm-nonmm-unstable branch
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2026 11:48:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260903184824.93DB01F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
The patch titled
Subject: ocfs2: skip uninitialized lockres in ocfs2_mark_lockres_freeing()
has been added to the -mm mm-nonmm-unstable branch. Its filename is
ocfs2-skip-uninitialized-lockres-in-ocfs2_mark_lockres_freeing.patch
This patch will shortly appear at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/ocfs2-skip-uninitialized-lockres-in-ocfs2_mark_lockres_freeing.patch
This patch will later appear in the mm-nonmm-unstable branch at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next via various
branches at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there most days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: ocfs2: skip uninitialized lockres in ocfs2_mark_lockres_freeing()
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2026 18:47:44 +0800
A hard readonly mount skips ocfs2_dlm_init(), so the per-osb lock
resources are never initialized and osb->cconn stays NULL. Before commit
550842cc60987 ("ocfs2: fix freeing uninitialized resource on
ocfs2_dlm_shutdown") ocfs2_dismount_volume() only called
ocfs2_dlm_shutdown() when osb->cconn was set. It now calls it
unconditionally, so unmounting a hard readonly mount drops the osb locks
and takes the never initialized l_lock in ocfs2_mark_lockres_freeing().
With lockdep enabled this triggers:
INFO: trying to register non-static key. The code is fine but needs
lockdep annotation, or maybe you didn't initialize this object before use?
turning off the locking correctness validator.
ocfs2_drop_lock() and ocfs2_lock_res_free() already skip lock resources
without OCFS2_LOCK_INITIALIZED. Add the same check to
ocfs2_mark_lockres_freeing(), which is reachable before them through
ocfs2_simple_drop_lockres(), so an uninitialized lockres is never touched.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260903104744.2164235-1-joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com
Fixes: 550842cc60987 ("ocfs2: fix freeing uninitialized resource on ocfs2_dlm_shutdown")
Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Reported-by: ZW Tang <tangzw515@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Cc: Changwei Ge <gechangwei@live.cn>
Cc: Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com>
Cc: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@suse.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
--- a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c~ocfs2-skip-uninitialized-lockres-in-ocfs2_mark_lockres_freeing
+++ a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
@@ -3525,6 +3525,10 @@ void ocfs2_mark_lockres_freeing(struct o
struct ocfs2_mask_waiter mw;
unsigned long flags, flags2;
+ /* We didn't get anywhere near actually using this lockres. */
+ if (!(lockres->l_flags & OCFS2_LOCK_INITIALIZED))
+ return;
+
ocfs2_init_mask_waiter(&mw);
spin_lock_irqsave(&lockres->l_lock, flags);
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com are
ocfs2-fix-deadlock-in-inline-data-truncate-transactions.patch
ocfs2-exit-recovery-thread-on-mount-error-path.patch
ocfs2-free-replay-slots-in-ocfs2_recovery_exit.patch
ocfs2-defer-suballocator-block-group-reclaim-to-workqueue.patch
ocfs2-restrict-ocfs2_invalid_slot-suballoc-slot-to-system-inodes.patch
ocfs2-validate-suballoc-bit-during-inode-read.patch
ocfs2-validate-suballoc-slot-and-bit-of-xattr-and-dir-index-blocks.patch
ocfs2-validate-suballoc-slot-and-bit-of-extent-and-refcount-blocks.patch
ocfs2-allow-xattr-bucket-entries-to-span-multiple-blocks.patch
ocfs2-reject-inconsistent-xattr-bucket-during-defrag.patch
ocfs2-skip-uninitialized-lockres-in-ocfs2_mark_lockres_freeing.patch
reply other threads:[~2026-09-03 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260903184824.93DB01F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gechangwei@live.cn \
--cc=heming.zhao@suse.com \
--cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
--cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=junxiao.bi@oracle.com \
--cc=mark@fasheh.com \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=piaojun@huawei.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tangzw515@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox