From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-qk1-f178.google.com (mail-qk1-f178.google.com [209.85.222.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F04C1DFF5 for ; Sat, 18 May 2024 16:39:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.222.178 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716050377; cv=none; b=GItMPEcppgKpoUGikTyE5BErVT/6Iv9gAMrYlgGYcSwQPhI1wSgzD8OCvQlZxvlsCstGrIvEH8Fb550rDb/icoXZb0FaP01SWMINQL0MbA0J00s3flYA8sOXaB2jdKuUfixNqaaxXUU+JD3cILPQtReOeHZaGfuhJQ1NT8VzJ8Y= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716050377; c=relaxed/simple; bh=zPhQHDXnzFC2/FX0+EDwa/m+/OgdtBuDDMMBNVOKQlY=; h=Content-Type:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Message-ID: Date:MIME-Version; b=HD4MzbsFHoAuLrthKJurrRm3zdkfZT6XcFQ68BLF8VWOOHQOpAmQavGFEKpCjk6MeGBp6XTk0RWbQYzRwbBkjsmw2QKNO5rf5h9MA5wh2s3BLn7pma5FDzFONc1VZnibdZIiDivZmmnmVJAL+VI+wdXQyb7wOAbvWKCa3uvoGNM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=JboUcmLG; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.222.178 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="JboUcmLG" Received: by mail-qk1-f178.google.com with SMTP id af79cd13be357-792bcfde2baso137321585a.3 for ; Sat, 18 May 2024 09:39:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1716050375; x=1716655175; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=mime-version:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:subject :references:in-reply-to:reply-to:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=syupm8YLcYHBmDZSLAX/fqxiwNvTRhfsyzSeOSliOBc=; b=JboUcmLGXc0CgwyBPGxNu44w85ip00wggrtkXsbaOBJ0sEmKbyf0O+wDk8DDsjuMdQ KBkZyYUej4Lfj4xzlPNQyPHmTTkR1zNI5/MDmT8MskcinKEyVjp0QkZaoew3OTJ6RsC/ q0J21juYWtjhIXCfa8L/GJ54Uys3BVcdC7AWMm2karIt+1TW2+hBh9GJUiN4dVRvaJZ1 O9nhnyFkHgCUVKXloyVoZjvV3cqFXxlehklF9NhJ5DomYqsJSFQWgcaYwj+3JsM123Ap T/u73gEZ4p7jV2zjXSMvARlnu+efHN8+WA6h4xEMVXDXGivgx8cJwkXtbY+OZ/lnYxc9 N4eQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1716050375; x=1716655175; h=mime-version:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:subject :references:in-reply-to:reply-to:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=syupm8YLcYHBmDZSLAX/fqxiwNvTRhfsyzSeOSliOBc=; b=mhDMDt+1iqk7Lz+l01SFgTCeiTbyZmfD8redK4XSEXOQOesdf1rwqvBJ0zVSJFZ4SP WquqtM1z1gjQQuOTzWZEolDCB8xgQDsuF+wTC/hIf8v4hBwIRGvM8vcYWbjXeuvfk8j8 L/zjjsA2gi1/YjE5sviIAHMwjIxvZE+fW0afmujlYXRPft9ypkgACtI7jDYvoPdyD7zK AvJ76gdw/jgUYYc0FgV+wZWSnVYN27jmQVJmLkIbDieSJKeBZy6AKCVxeAVE+nqWHW8y P1BgrKO02j9+btxtmobyxdFUwqrGEbrf0iQPOsPmrNa2RbpK2Pkc+aGFIAX651Z/sQYg kWLA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwnIDF47X9Tx8Ibv1MNSLdU5iHjJSU/UgX0nZm9il+HoBUZuakO 3y/7m1YLelQRQbPtc468c4u/0OLx4F210m/74rHSNe6H/5bJ46oHdsXs X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGHRbU2c8osITeOwn3n3KC+8jECdBMH8t62UOBtd7KkXhkecZV/3s1Skltkrqv4vpLXLZb/yQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:a56:b0:792:b8c8:8654 with SMTP id af79cd13be357-792c759fafamr2469089385a.17.1716050374923; Sat, 18 May 2024 09:39:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([172.200.199.252]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id af79cd13be357-792bf340533sm1002858785a.133.2024.05.18.09.39.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 18 May 2024 09:39:34 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: MPTCP CI To: Matthieu Baerts Cc: mptcp@lists.linux.dev Reply-To: mptcp@lists.linux.dev In-Reply-To: <20240518-mptcp-doc-v2-0-68304a17cd7d@kernel.org> References: <20240518-mptcp-doc-v2-0-68304a17cd7d@kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v2 0/3] doc: introduce MPTCP global doc Message-ID: <02a79760-abca-3b23-af32-abebf39be926@gmail.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sat, 18 May 2024 16:39:33 +0000 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: mptcp@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi Matthieu, Thank you for your modifications, that's great! Our CI did some validations and here is its report: - KVM Validation: normal: Unstable: 1 failed test(s): selftest_mptcp_join = =F0=9F=94=B4 - KVM Validation: debug: Success! =E2=9C=85 - KVM Validation: btf (only bpftest_all): Success! =E2=9C=85 - Task: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/actions/runs/914104= 6566 Initiator: Patchew Applier Commits: https://github.= com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commits/65924c221c10 Patchwork: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/mptcp/list/?series=3D854193 If there are some issues, you can reproduce them using the same = environment as the one used by the CI thanks to a docker image, e.g.: $ cd [kernel source code] $ docker run -v "${PWD}:${PWD}:rw" -w = "${PWD}" --privileged --rm -it \ --pull always = mptcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker:latest \ auto-normal For more details: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp-upstream-virt= me-docker Please note that despite all the efforts that have been already= done to have a stable tests suite when executed on a public CI like here, = it is possible some reported issues are not due to your modifications. = Still, do not hesitate to help us improve that ;-) Cheers, MPTCP GH Action bot Bot operated by Matthieu Baerts (NGI0 = Core)