From: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, mptcp@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH mptcp-next] selftests: mptcp: more stable simult_flows tests
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2026 13:43:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <033cc315-9ac6-4b65-ba2c-a58779a39e20@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ec938f018aed693c624c7a61366b28c863a1d56d.1771276854.git.pabeni@redhat.com>
Hi Paolo,
On 16/02/2026 22:20, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> By default, the netem qdisc can keep up to 1000 packets under its belly
> to deal with the configured rate and delay. The simult flows test-case
> simulates very low speed links, to avoid problems due to slow CPUs and
> the TCP stack tend to transmit at a slightly higher rate than the
> (virtual) link constraints.
>
> All the above causes a relatively large amount of packets being enqueued
> in the netem qdiscs - the longer the transfer, the longer the queue -
> producing increasingly high TCP RTT samples and consequently increasingly
> larger receive buffer size due to DRS.
>
> When the receive buffer size becomes considerably larger than the needed
> size, the tests results can flake, i.e. because minimal inaccuracy in the
> pacing rate can lead to a single subflow usage towards the end of the
> connection for a considerable amount of data.
>
> Address the issue explicitly setting netem limits suitable for the
> configured link speeds and unflake all the affected tests.
Now in our tree:
New patches for t/upstream-net and t/upstream:
- d4a47ee7f8da: selftests: mptcp: more stable simult_flows tests
- Results: cf97a02cb523..656b5899eb47 (export-net)
- Results: 40e2b2255e42..683fca3ca9ae (export)
New patches for t/upstream:
- 86c0019571dc: tg: revert 'mark some simult flows tests as flaky'
- Results: 683fca3ca9ae..eb01783b4b05 (export)
Tests are now in progress:
- export:
https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commit/ea2e74b9a2b44abc3e5e102cb25cf415b3eb3727/checks
- export-net:
https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commit/abb26bf620660fa96804166f9452ad49d6b14c18/checks
Cheers,
Matt
--
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-18 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-16 21:20 [PATCH mptcp-next] selftests: mptcp: more stable simult_flows tests Paolo Abeni
2026-02-16 22:31 ` MPTCP CI
2026-02-17 9:45 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-02-17 9:54 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-02-18 12:13 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-02-18 15:48 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-02-18 12:43 ` Matthieu Baerts [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=033cc315-9ac6-4b65-ba2c-a58779a39e20@kernel.org \
--to=matttbe@kernel.org \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox