From: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org>
To: Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>
Cc: MPTCP Upstream <mptcp@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mptcp-net v2 2/6] selftests: mptcp: join: rm: set backup flag
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2025 09:47:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0b8d61bc-836b-4f61-a8c7-a5ce17906e19@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c707d12083543db56fa5b2f361837d1c29931c58.camel@kernel.org>
On 04/11/2025 08:29, Geliang Tang wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> On Tue, 2025-11-04 at 07:57 +0100, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
>> Hi Geliang,
>>
>> Thank you for the review.
>>
>> 4 Nov 2025 07:06:34 Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>:
>>
>>> Hi Matt,
>>>
>>> Thanks for this fix. It works indeed.
>>>
>>> On Sun, 2025-11-02 at 12:30 +0100, Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) wrote:
>>>> Some of these 'remove' tests rarely fail because a subflow has
>>>> been
>>>
>>> In my testing, only the "flush addresses" test case fails
>>> intermittently. I'm wondering which other test cases have failed in
>>> your environment?
>>
>> I took the unstable ones from the Netdev and MPTCP CIs:
>>
>> https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/contest.html?pass=0&executor=vmksft-mptcp-dbg&ld-cases=1
>>
>> https://ci-results.mptcp.dev/flakes.html
>>
>>> I'm thinking we shouldn't add the "backup" flag to every test in
>>> remove_tests, but only to the specific ones that are actually
>>> failing.
>>>
>>> Similarly for patches 3 and 4, we don't need to add
>>> "test_linkfail=128"
>>> to every test. We should only apply it to the specific ones that
>>> are
>>> actually failing.
>>
>> If my analysis is correct, it means the simple fixes I did (backup
>> and
>> longer file size) can be applied to multiple tests. Then probably
>> better
>> to avoid these other tests to fail for the same reasons even if it is
>> very
>> rare, and very hard to reproduce, no? Each false positive takes a lot
>> of
>> resources (mainly time) to debug.
>
> I'll leave it to you to decide. However, I still believe it's better to
> apply these fixes to the tests one by one, in case we see failures in
> the future.
Because these modifications are not modifying what is being validated in
the test, but only avoid noises that would make the tests failing, I
think it is better to prevent issues and waiting for them to happen.
> I'll respond with my Reviewed-by tag in the cover letter.
Thanks!
Cheers,
Matt
--
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-04 8:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-02 11:30 [PATCH mptcp-net v2 0/6] selftests: mptcp: join: fix flaky tests Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2025-11-02 11:30 ` [PATCH mptcp-net v2 1/6] selftests: mptcp: connect: fix fallback note due to OoO Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2025-11-04 5:53 ` Geliang Tang
2025-11-02 11:30 ` [PATCH mptcp-net v2 2/6] selftests: mptcp: join: rm: set backup flag Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2025-11-04 6:06 ` Geliang Tang
2025-11-04 6:57 ` Matthieu Baerts
2025-11-04 7:29 ` Geliang Tang
2025-11-04 8:47 ` Matthieu Baerts [this message]
2025-11-04 8:47 ` Matthieu Baerts
2025-11-02 11:30 ` [PATCH mptcp-net v2 3/6] selftests: mptcp: join: endpoints: longer transfer Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2025-11-02 11:30 ` [PATCH mptcp-net v2 4/6] selftests: mptcp: join: userspace: " Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2025-11-02 11:30 ` [PATCH mptcp-net v2 5/6] selftests: mptcp: join: fastclose: drop plain RST Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2025-11-03 7:16 ` Geliang Tang
2025-11-02 11:30 ` [PATCH mptcp-net v2 6/6] selftests: mptcp: connect: trunc: read all recv data Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2025-11-03 7:13 ` Geliang Tang
2025-11-03 12:12 ` Matthieu Baerts
2025-11-04 5:56 ` Geliang Tang
2025-11-02 12:33 ` [PATCH mptcp-net v2 0/6] selftests: mptcp: join: fix flaky tests MPTCP CI
2025-11-03 11:57 ` MPTCP CI
2025-11-04 7:30 ` Geliang Tang
2025-11-04 12:10 ` Matthieu Baerts
2025-11-05 2:00 ` Geliang Tang
2025-11-05 5:57 ` Geliang Tang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0b8d61bc-836b-4f61-a8c7-a5ce17906e19@kernel.org \
--to=matttbe@kernel.org \
--cc=geliang@kernel.org \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox