From: Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>
To: "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <matttbe@kernel.org>, mptcp@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH mptcp-net 1/2] mptcp: init: protect sched with rcu_read_lock
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 09:28:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0f2bb0288b7ec128c80c45dd4ae16c8b8b1236d3.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241016-mptcp-sched-find-rcu-v1-1-5e9af4fbce11@kernel.org>
Hi Matt,
Thanks for this fix.
On Wed, 2024-10-16 at 21:05 +0200, Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) wrote:
> Enabling CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_LIST with its dependence CONFIG_RCU_EXPERT
> creates this splat when an MPTCP socket is created:
>
> =============================
> WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
> 6.12.0-rc2+ #11 Not tainted
> -----------------------------
> net/mptcp/sched.c:44 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
>
> rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
> no locks held by mptcp_connect/176.
>
> stack backtrace:
> CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 176 Comm: mptcp_connect Not tainted 6.12.0-rc2+
> #11
> Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:123)
> lockdep_rcu_suspicious (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:6822)
> mptcp_sched_find (net/mptcp/sched.c:44 (discriminator 7))
> mptcp_init_sock (net/mptcp/protocol.c:2867 (discriminator 1))
> ? sock_init_data_uid (arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h:28)
> inet_create.part.0.constprop.0 (net/ipv4/af_inet.c:386)
> ? __sock_create (include/linux/rcupdate.h:347 (discriminator 1))
> __sock_create (net/socket.c:1576)
> __sys_socket (net/socket.c:1671)
> ? __pfx___sys_socket (net/socket.c:1712)
> ? do_user_addr_fault (arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1419 (discriminator 1))
> __x64_sys_socket (net/socket.c:1728)
> do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 (discriminator 1))
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130)
>
> That's because when the socket is initialised, rcu_read_lock() is not
> used despite the explicit comment written above the declaration of
> mptcp_sched_find() in sched.c. Adding the missing lock/unlock avoids
> the
> warning.
>
> Fixes: 1730b2b2c5a5 ("mptcp: add sched in mptcp_sock")
> Closes: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/issues/523
> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>
Good catch!
Some code in tcp_ca_dst_init() uses rcu_read_lock() too:
rcu_read_lock();
ca = tcp_ca_find_key(ca_key);
if (likely(ca && bpf_try_module_get(ca, ca->owner))) {
bpf_module_put(...);
icsk->icsk_ca_dst_locked = tcp_ca_dst_locked(dst);
icsk->icsk_ca_ops = ca;
}
rcu_read_unlock();
I will also sync this part of the changes to BPF path manager code
which is under review.
-Geliang
> ---
> net/mptcp/protocol.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> index
> e420ce9bbfb6e0527ed3ce8cbe2a0990c6366d12..21bc3586c33e16471056fedf49e
> e044ba27731d9 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> @@ -2864,8 +2864,10 @@ static int mptcp_init_sock(struct sock *sk)
> if (unlikely(!net->mib.mptcp_statistics) && !mptcp_mib_alloc(net))
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> + rcu_read_lock();
> ret = mptcp_init_sched(mptcp_sk(sk),
> mptcp_sched_find(mptcp_get_scheduler(net)));
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-17 1:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-16 19:05 [PATCH mptcp-net 0/2] mptcp: "fix suspicious RCU usage" warnings Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2024-10-16 19:05 ` [PATCH mptcp-net 1/2] mptcp: init: protect sched with rcu_read_lock Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2024-10-17 1:28 ` Geliang Tang [this message]
2024-10-16 19:05 ` [PATCH mptcp-net 2/2] Squash to "bpf: Add bpf_mptcp_sched_ops" Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2024-10-17 1:29 ` Geliang Tang
2024-10-17 8:09 ` Matthieu Baerts
2024-10-16 20:11 ` [PATCH mptcp-net 0/2] mptcp: "fix suspicious RCU usage" warnings MPTCP CI
2024-10-17 9:06 ` Matthieu Baerts
2024-10-17 9:38 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-10-17 9:47 ` Matthieu Baerts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0f2bb0288b7ec128c80c45dd4ae16c8b8b1236d3.camel@kernel.org \
--to=geliang@kernel.org \
--cc=matttbe@kernel.org \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox