From: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org>
To: Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>, mptcp@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v1 2/2] selftests: mptcp: sockopt: add TCP_MAXSEG sockopt tests
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 13:20:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1d68fc7d-06e7-493c-a207-658035c37af9@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <98b1b574823f8447f8418b5567800ec01faba529.1745314165.git.tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
Hi Geliang,
On 22/04/2025 11:30, Geliang Tang wrote:
> From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
>
> This patch adds the TCP_MAXSEG sockopt tests in mptcp_sockopt.c. Since
> in getsockopt TCP_MAXSEG, the "user_mss" value can be obtained only in
> the LISTEN state (see do_tcp_getsockopt in net/ipv4/tcp.c), the test
> items are added to server() instead of client().
I think it is better to use packetdrill to do such validation, similar
to what was done with other socket options. No?
> Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
> ---
> .../selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_sockopt.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_sockopt.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_sockopt.c
> index 926b0be87c99..e2043c0261bd 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_sockopt.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_sockopt.c
> @@ -689,6 +689,26 @@ static int xaccept(int s)
> return fd;
> }
>
> +static void test_tcp_maxseg_sockopt(int fd)
> +{
> + int maxseg = 1000;
> + socklen_t s;
> + int r;
> +
> + s = sizeof(maxseg);
> + r = setsockopt(fd, IPPROTO_TCP, TCP_MAXSEG, &maxseg, s);
> + if (r != 0)
> + die_perror("setsockopt TCP_MAXSEG");
> +
> + maxseg = 0;
> + r = getsockopt(fd, IPPROTO_TCP, TCP_MAXSEG, &maxseg, &s);
> + if (r != -1 && errno != EINVAL)
> + die_perror("getsockopt TCP_MAXSEG did not indicate -EINVAL");
> +
> + if (maxseg != 1000)
> + xerror("maxseg=%d", maxseg);
> +}
Here, you set and get the value, but you don't really check the
behaviour is the one we expect.
It is important to check the behaviour. It would be easier to do that
with packetdrill I think.
> +
> static int server(int pipefd)
> {
> int fd = -1, r;
> @@ -713,6 +733,8 @@ static int server(int pipefd)
>
> process_one_client(r, pipefd);
>
> + test_tcp_maxseg_sockopt(fd);
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
Cheers,
Matt
--
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-22 11:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-22 9:30 [PATCH mptcp-next v1 0/2] Add TCP_MAXSEG socket option support Geliang Tang
2025-04-22 9:30 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v1 1/2] mptcp: add TCP_MAXSEG sockopt support Geliang Tang
2025-04-22 11:18 ` Matthieu Baerts
2025-04-22 9:30 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v1 2/2] selftests: mptcp: sockopt: add TCP_MAXSEG sockopt tests Geliang Tang
2025-04-22 11:20 ` Matthieu Baerts [this message]
2025-04-23 9:46 ` Geliang Tang
2025-04-22 10:52 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v1 0/2] Add TCP_MAXSEG socket option support MPTCP CI
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1d68fc7d-06e7-493c-a207-658035c37af9@kernel.org \
--to=matttbe@kernel.org \
--cc=geliang@kernel.org \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tanggeliang@kylinos.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox