From: Florian Westphal <fw at strlen.de>
To: mptcp at lists.01.org
Subject: [MPTCP] [PATCH mptcp-next 2/9] mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 17:38:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210317163828.27406-3-fw@strlen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20210317163828.27406-1-fw@strlen.de
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3701 bytes --]
start with something simple: both take an integer value, both
need to be mirrored to all subflows.
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw(a)strlen.de>
---
net/mptcp/sockopt.c | 95 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 95 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/sockopt.c b/net/mptcp/sockopt.c
index fa71216e11a3..33ca67e99f8f 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/sockopt.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/sockopt.c
@@ -24,6 +24,81 @@ static struct sock *__mptcp_tcp_fallback(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
return msk->first;
}
+static int mptcp_get_int_option(struct mptcp_sock *msk, sockptr_t optval, unsigned int optlen, int *val)
+{
+ if (optlen < sizeof(int))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (copy_from_sockptr(val, optval, sizeof(*val)))
+ return -EFAULT;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void mptcp_so_keepalive(struct mptcp_sock *msk, int val)
+{
+ struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow;
+ struct sock *sk = (struct sock *)msk;
+
+ lock_sock(sk);
+
+ mptcp_for_each_subflow(msk, subflow) {
+ struct sock *ssk = mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow);
+ bool slow = lock_sock_fast(ssk);
+
+ if (ssk->sk_prot->keepalive)
+ ssk->sk_prot->keepalive(ssk, !!val);
+ sock_valbool_flag(ssk, SOCK_KEEPOPEN, !!val);
+ unlock_sock_fast(ssk, slow);
+ }
+
+ sock_valbool_flag(sk, SOCK_KEEPOPEN, !!val);
+ release_sock(sk);
+}
+
+static int mptcp_so_priority(struct mptcp_sock *msk, int val)
+{
+ sockptr_t optval = KERNEL_SOCKPTR(&val);
+ struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow;
+ struct sock *sk = (struct sock *)msk;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = sock_setsockopt(sk->sk_socket, SOL_SOCKET, SO_PRIORITY,
+ optval, sizeof(val));
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ lock_sock(sk);
+ mptcp_for_each_subflow(msk, subflow) {
+ struct sock *ssk = mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow);
+
+ WRITE_ONCE(ssk->sk_priority, val);
+ }
+ release_sock(sk);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int mptcp_setsockopt_sol_socket_int(struct mptcp_sock *msk, int optname,
+ sockptr_t optval, unsigned int optlen)
+{
+ int val, ret;
+
+ ret = mptcp_get_int_option(msk, optval, optlen, &val);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ switch (optname) {
+ case SO_KEEPALIVE:
+ mptcp_so_keepalive(msk, val);
+ return 0;
+ case SO_PRIORITY:
+ return mptcp_so_priority(msk, val);
+ }
+
+ return -ENOPROTOOPT;
+}
+
static int mptcp_setsockopt_sol_socket(struct mptcp_sock *msk, int optname,
sockptr_t optval, unsigned int optlen)
{
@@ -50,6 +125,9 @@ static int mptcp_setsockopt_sol_socket(struct mptcp_sock *msk, int optname,
}
release_sock(sk);
return ret;
+ case SO_KEEPALIVE:
+ case SO_PRIORITY:
+ return mptcp_setsockopt_sol_socket_int(msk, optname, optval, optlen);
}
return sock_setsockopt(sk->sk_socket, SOL_SOCKET, optname, optval, optlen);
@@ -350,6 +428,22 @@ int mptcp_getsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
+static void sync_socket_options(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock *ssk)
+{
+ struct sock *sk = (struct sock *)msk;
+ bool slow = lock_sock_fast(ssk);
+
+ if (ssk->sk_prot->keepalive) {
+ if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_KEEPOPEN))
+ ssk->sk_prot->keepalive(ssk, 1);
+ else
+ ssk->sk_prot->keepalive(ssk, 0);
+ }
+
+ ssk->sk_priority = sk->sk_priority;
+ unlock_sock_fast(ssk, slow);
+}
+
void mptcp_sockopt_sync(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock *ssk)
{
struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow;
@@ -360,6 +454,7 @@ void mptcp_sockopt_sync(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock *ssk)
if (subflow->setsockopt_seq == msk->setsockopt_seq)
return;
+ sync_socket_options(msk, ssk);
subflow->setsockopt_seq = msk->setsockopt_seq;
}
--
2.26.2
next prev reply other threads:[~2021-03-17 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-17 16:38 [MPTCP] [RFC PATCH mptcp-next 0/9] initial SOL_SOCKET support Florian Westphal
2021-03-17 16:38 ` [MPTCP] [PATCH mptcp-next 1/9] mptcp: add skeleton to sync msk socket options to subflows Florian Westphal
2021-03-19 11:33 ` [MPTCP] " Paolo Abeni
2021-03-19 12:34 ` Florian Westphal
2021-03-19 14:36 ` Paolo Abeni
2021-03-17 16:38 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2021-03-19 11:43 ` [MPTCP] Re: [PATCH mptcp-next 2/9] mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY Paolo Abeni
2021-03-19 12:35 ` Florian Westphal
2021-03-17 16:38 ` [MPTCP] [PATCH mptcp-next 3/9] mptcp: setsockopt: handle receive/send buffer and device bind Florian Westphal
2021-03-19 11:44 ` [MPTCP] " Paolo Abeni
2021-03-19 12:37 ` Florian Westphal
2021-03-17 16:38 ` [MPTCP] [PATCH mptcp-next 8/9] mptcp: sockopt: add TCP_CONGESTION Florian Westphal
2021-03-19 11:54 ` [MPTCP] " Paolo Abeni
2021-03-19 12:19 ` Paolo Abeni
2021-03-17 16:38 ` [MPTCP] [PATCH mptcp-next 9/9] mptcp: sockopt: handle TCP_INFO Florian Westphal
2021-03-19 12:00 ` [MPTCP] " Paolo Abeni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210317163828.27406-3-fw@strlen.de \
--to=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox