MPTCP Linux Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
	mptcp@lists.linux.dev, mptcp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH mptcp-next v2 5/8] mptcp: setsockopt: add SO_MARK support
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 10:32:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210325093206.GA26567@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c4fbd91c-2873-956b-df8-7bba2da711f@linux.intel.com>

Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Mar 2021, Florian Westphal wrote:
> 
> > Value is synced to all subflows.
> > 
> 
> The use case I remember for SO_MARK with MPTCP was to designate different
> interfaces for different subflows:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/mptcp/CAKD1Yr2sBCdUO48cp=rZQ6s4v13ytpPd9oPT+U=iYrdXtba5HA@mail.gmail.com/
> 
> 
> Once we have a way to set individual subflow options, it could both be
> useful to set sk_mark on all subflows, and also to not override individual
> settings. The current sync mechanism would overwrite all supported options
> when any single option changes.
> 
> There's no way for these options to diverge yet, so we could wait on solving
> that problem. Do you think it's better to stick with the current syncing
> method for now, or to do more detailed tracking of which options need to be
> synced?

Looks like same issue as with TCP_CONGESTION.
Q is how we can expose the individual subflows.

I see
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hesmans-mptcp-socket-03

Should that be implemented instead of this?

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-25  9:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-24 13:15 [RFC PATCH mptcp-next v2 0/8] initial SOL_SOCKET support Florian Westphal
2021-03-24 13:15 ` [RFC PATCH mptcp-next v2 1/8] mptcp: add skeleton to sync msk socket options to subflows Florian Westphal
2021-03-24 17:38   ` [MPTCP] " Paolo Abeni
2021-03-24 20:01     ` Florian Westphal
2021-03-25  9:51       ` Paolo Abeni
2021-03-25 12:49         ` Florian Westphal
2021-03-25 13:12           ` Paolo Abeni
2021-03-25 14:06             ` Florian Westphal
2021-03-25 14:33               ` Paolo Abeni
2021-03-25 14:45                 ` Florian Westphal
2021-03-26  9:59                   ` Paolo Abeni
2021-03-24 13:15 ` [RFC PATCH mptcp-next v2 2/8] mptcp: setsockopt: handle SO_KEEPALIVE and SO_PRIORITY Florian Westphal
2021-03-24 13:15 ` [RFC PATCH mptcp-next v2 3/8] mptcp: setsockopt: handle receive/send buffer and device bind Florian Westphal
2021-03-24 16:34   ` [MPTCP] " Paolo Abeni
2021-03-24 17:15     ` Florian Westphal
2021-03-24 13:15 ` [RFC PATCH mptcp-next v2 4/8] mptcp: setsockopt: support SO_LINGER Florian Westphal
2021-03-24 13:15 ` [RFC PATCH mptcp-next v2 5/8] mptcp: setsockopt: add SO_MARK support Florian Westphal
2021-03-25  1:22   ` Mat Martineau
2021-03-25  9:32     ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2021-03-26  0:14       ` Mat Martineau
2021-03-24 13:15 ` [RFC PATCH mptcp-next v2 6/8] mptcp: setsockopt: add SO_INCOMING_CPU Florian Westphal
2021-03-24 13:15 ` [RFC PATCH mptcp-next v2 7/8] mptcp: setsockopt: SO_DEBUG and no-op options Florian Westphal
2021-03-24 13:15 ` [RFC PATCH mptcp-next v2 8/8] mptcp: sockopt: add TCP_CONGESTION and TCP_INFO Florian Westphal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210325093206.GA26567@breakpoint.cc \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mptcp@lists.01.org \
    --cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox