From: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
To: mptcp@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH mptcp-next v2] Squash-to: "selftests: mptcp: tweak simult_flows for debug kernels"
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2022 16:51:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220705235144.221591-1-mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com> (raw)
kbuild is still seeing intermittent failures in the simult_flows.sh
test. It uses a kernel config without kmemleak, but with other
performance-affecting debug options like lockdep and kasan.
Example failures:
kernel-selftests.net/mptcp.simult_flows.sh.unbalanced_bwidth_with_unbalanced_delay_transfer_slower_than_expected!_runtime_4339_ms_expected_4005_ms_max_4005.fail
kernel-selftests.net/mptcp.simult_flows.sh.unbalanced_bwidth_transfer_slower_than_expected!_runtime_4285_ms_expected_4005_ms_max_4005.fail
kernel-selftests.net/mptcp.simult_flows.sh.unbalanced_bwidth_transfer_slower_than_expected!_runtime_4346_ms_expected_4005_ms_max_4005.fail
Adjust the debug detection to look for more kernel debug features and
further loosen the simult_flows timing constraints if any of those
features are detected.
v2: Use kallsyms for debug feature detection, increase the debug timeout.
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/simult_flows.sh | 9 ++++++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/simult_flows.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/simult_flows.sh
index e266b26a4274..ffa13a957a36 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/simult_flows.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/simult_flows.sh
@@ -110,9 +110,12 @@ setup()
# debug build can slow down measurably the test program
# we use quite tight time limit on the run-time, to ensure
# maximum B/W usage.
- # Use the kmemleak file presence as a rough estimate for this being
- # a debug kernel and increase the maximum run-time accordingly
- [ -f /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak ] && slack=$((slack+200))
+ # Use kmemleak/lockdep/kasan/prove_locking presence as a rough
+ # estimate for this being a debug kernel and increase the
+ # maximum run-time accordingly. Observed run times for CI builds
+ # running selftests, including kbuild, were used to determine the
+ # amount of time to add.
+ grep -q ' kmemleak_init$\| lockdep_init$\| kasan_init$\| prove_locking$' /proc/kallsyms && slack=$((slack+550))
}
# $1: ns, $2: port
--
2.37.0
next reply other threads:[~2022-07-05 23:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-05 23:51 Mat Martineau [this message]
2022-07-06 1:40 ` Squash-to: "selftests: mptcp: tweak simult_flows for debug kernels": Tests Results MPTCP CI
2022-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2] Squash-to: "selftests: mptcp: tweak simult_flows for debug kernels" Matthieu Baerts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220705235144.221591-1-mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com \
--to=mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox