From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52C1D17E9; Sun, 4 Feb 2024 01:19:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.21 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707009597; cv=none; b=aBOuCdQtoFswHF4P7S0T4BIFfqrzrzUhtQtRiRLppbWIl60+/49iIyNOdwsmrSBvGGUk2uxZQRV+UvdpblurbYk0HO6vXobvNTVmqido+9Z9XPd+gdoFdGTlCjSbwiuXzZQ4AWqOJzNCJo3HdhcuKEsnBJYpxwPnXIybGQj3Weo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707009597; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gynVH3mnYBen4IZImceAFmZdt7Oj+QDmyHtWJsldE9k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=g5Zkfo3/K/41aOcWqwfGmCZLUIlqbnsJxjW5SP6pwrgBEM3Ue2JBNmJigupCyQi7PwncihneYu/jfqrnE1Ehx7X8T1H1c2Bf7XQbk8V1m1t/7s54lJYPtEaYFS2WOrpv7lGUqqLL0V+4QfxkNC4XlYXMK6c7qa33gSqzv4Z+HDI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=WNf+fTwk; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.21 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="WNf+fTwk" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1707009596; x=1738545596; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=gynVH3mnYBen4IZImceAFmZdt7Oj+QDmyHtWJsldE9k=; b=WNf+fTwk2chjHaNFdahAPbDKOqBnEGBXiUVwAGEUmT6TBDnrtbhTWdLG YfglB1si4Dp+6zvBMlD9xzXFhpfMGgqI9Wt21aN5UjYbjMLCD7rjPBmTH ny+Bob9KdL1dG5fsfIAwJM5I/z4zm8kvqWeaOHPEawBcnSNEUAaVuGu/p dqeTuO/GlbskV8i90a+QmCx+rTBg+mhNaYvzQ6dFXYbWqXlATKOL8LwEt /gHRGChc/Tkk2WMWW9opeoEV6erpC1/Jewz9AGDixx0/rQBcTuuffhcTl 63iirHisnXQk7hGorJcWXTxWuXD3s35j9RlhFhwLHAtYKb0Wh22OFQunf Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10973"; a="273039" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.05,241,1701158400"; d="scan'208";a="273039" Received: from fmviesa003.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.143]) by orvoesa113.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Feb 2024 17:19:55 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.05,241,1701158400"; d="scan'208";a="5028400" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO 59f4f4cd5935) ([10.239.97.151]) by fmviesa003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 03 Feb 2024 17:19:50 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 59f4f4cd5935 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1rWRAf-0005pu-0E; Sun, 04 Feb 2024 01:19:47 +0000 Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2024 09:19:31 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Geliang Tang , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , Matthieu Baerts , Eduard Zingerman , John Fastabend , KP Singh , Stanislav Fomichev , Hao Luo , Jiri Olsa Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Geliang Tang , bpf@vger.kernel.org, mptcp@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] bpf, btf: Add register_check_missing_btf helper Message-ID: <202402040934.Fph0XeEo-lkp@intel.com> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: mptcp@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Hi Geliang, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on bpf-next/master] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Geliang-Tang/bpf-btf-Add-register_check_missing_btf-helper/20240203-155524 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/f4b147ddaa8fe8c07c7ba77a1d61780bffc49bb6.1706946547.git.tanggeliang%40kylinos.cn patch subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] bpf, btf: Add register_check_missing_btf helper config: arm-imxrt_defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240204/202402040934.Fph0XeEo-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 19.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 7dd790db8b77c4a833c06632e903dc4f13877a64) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240204/202402040934.Fph0XeEo-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202402040934.Fph0XeEo-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> kernel/bpf/btf.c:7750:11: error: incomplete definition of type 'struct module' 7750 | module->name, msg); | ~~~~~~^ include/linux/printk.h:508:37: note: expanded from macro 'pr_warn' 508 | printk(KERN_WARNING pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__) | ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/printk.h:455:60: note: expanded from macro 'printk' 455 | #define printk(fmt, ...) printk_index_wrap(_printk, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) | ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/printk.h:427:19: note: expanded from macro 'printk_index_wrap' 427 | _p_func(_fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/printk.h:348:8: note: forward declaration of 'struct module' 348 | struct module; | ^ kernel/bpf/btf.c:7753:63: error: incomplete definition of type 'struct module' 7753 | pr_err("missing module %s BTF, cannot register %s\n", module->name, msg); | ~~~~~~^ include/linux/printk.h:498:33: note: expanded from macro 'pr_err' 498 | printk(KERN_ERR pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__) | ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/printk.h:455:60: note: expanded from macro 'printk' 455 | #define printk(fmt, ...) printk_index_wrap(_printk, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) | ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/printk.h:427:19: note: expanded from macro 'printk_index_wrap' 427 | _p_func(_fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/printk.h:348:8: note: forward declaration of 'struct module' 348 | struct module; | ^ 2 errors generated. vim +7750 kernel/bpf/btf.c 7740 7741 static int register_check_missing_btf(const struct module *module, const char *msg) 7742 { 7743 if (!module && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF)) { 7744 pr_err("missing vmlinux BTF, cannot register %s\n", msg); 7745 return -ENOENT; 7746 } 7747 if (module && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF_MODULES)) { 7748 if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULE_ALLOW_BTF_MISMATCH)) { 7749 pr_warn("allow module %s BTF mismatch, skip register %s\n", > 7750 module->name, msg); 7751 return 0; 7752 } 7753 pr_err("missing module %s BTF, cannot register %s\n", module->name, msg); 7754 return -ENOENT; 7755 } 7756 return 0; 7757 } 7758 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki