MPTCP Linux Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <matttbe@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, sashal@kernel.org
Cc: MPTCP Upstream <mptcp@lists.linux.dev>,
	"Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <matttbe@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.1.y] mptcp: continue marking the first subflow as UNCONNECTED
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 18:21:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240228172121.243458-2-matttbe@kernel.org> (raw)

After the 'Fixes' commit mentioned below, which is a partial backport,
the MPTCP worker was no longer marking the first subflow as "UNCONNECTED"
when the socket was transitioning to TCP_CLOSE state.

As a result, in v6.1, it was no longer possible to reconnect to the just
disconnected socket. Continue to do that like before, only for the first
subflow.

A few refactoring have been done around the 'msk->subflow' in later
versions, and it looks like this is not needed to do that there, but
still needed in v6.1. Without that, the 'disconnect' tests from the
mptcp_connect.sh selftest fail: they repeat the transfer 3 times by
reconnecting to the server each time.

Fixes: 7857e35ef10e ("mptcp: get rid of msk->subflow")
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
---
Notes:
 - This is specific to the 6.1 version having the partial backport.
---
 net/mptcp/protocol.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index cdabb00648bd2..125825db642cc 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -2440,6 +2440,8 @@ static void __mptcp_close_ssk(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk,
 	need_push = (flags & MPTCP_CF_PUSH) && __mptcp_retransmit_pending_data(sk);
 	if (!dispose_it) {
 		__mptcp_subflow_disconnect(ssk, subflow, flags);
+		if (msk->subflow && ssk == msk->subflow->sk)
+			msk->subflow->state = SS_UNCONNECTED;
 		release_sock(ssk);
 
 		goto out;
-- 
2.43.0


             reply	other threads:[~2024-02-28 17:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-28 17:21 Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) [this message]
2024-02-28 17:50 ` mptcp: continue marking the first subflow as UNCONNECTED: Build Failure MPTCP CI
2024-03-04  8:11 ` [PATCH 6.1.y] mptcp: continue marking the first subflow as UNCONNECTED Greg KH
2024-03-04  8:11 ` Patch "mptcp: continue marking the first subflow as UNCONNECTED" has been added to the 5.4-stable tree gregkh
2024-03-04  8:18   ` Greg KH
2024-03-04  8:11 ` Patch "mptcp: continue marking the first subflow as UNCONNECTED" has been added to the 6.1-stable tree gregkh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240228172121.243458-2-matttbe@kernel.org \
    --to=matttbe@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox