MPTCP Linux Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <matttbe@kernel.org>
Cc: Mat Martineau <martineau@kernel.org>,
	Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, mptcp@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Gang Yan <yangang@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/5] mptcp: out-of-order queue pruning
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2026 17:58:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260727175820.593c039e@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260724-net-next-mptcp-oooq-pruning-v1-0-5dd4dec63a54@kernel.org>

On Fri, 24 Jul 2026 16:02:12 +0200 Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) wrote:
> Under memory pressure, a pruning of the MPTCP-level OoO queue might be
> required as last resort, to avoid too long recoveries, or even stalls.
> Geliang and Gang managed to reproduce this behaviour, and Paolo
> improved the situation thanks to the following patches:
> 
> - Patches 1-2: improve the MPTCP-level retransmission schema to make
>   recoveries from memory pressure/after MPTCP-level drop significantly
>   faster.
> 
> - Patches 2-3: make the admission check way stricter for incoming
>   packets exceeding the memory limits, with some exceptions for fallback
>   sockets.
> 
> - Patch 5: implement OoO queue pruning for MPTCP.

Clashiko complains about a typo and has some suggestions which are
marked as Low but potentially worth addressing (stats naming?)
Please LMK if you completely disagree
-- 
pw-bot: cr

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-28  0:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-24 14:02 [PATCH net-next 0/5] mptcp: out-of-order queue pruning Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-07-24 14:02 ` [PATCH net-next 1/5] mptcp: move the retrans loop to a separate helper Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-07-24 14:02 ` [PATCH net-next 2/5] mptcp: let the retrans scheduler do its job Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-07-24 14:02 ` [PATCH net-next 3/5] mptcp: explicitly drop over memory limits Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-07-27  9:07   ` Paolo Abeni
2026-07-24 14:02 ` [PATCH net-next 4/5] mptcp: enforce hard limit on backlog flushing Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-07-24 14:02 ` [PATCH net-next 5/5] mptcp: implemented OoO queue pruning Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-07-28  0:58 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260727175820.593c039e@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=geliang@kernel.org \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martineau@kernel.org \
    --cc=matttbe@kernel.org \
    --cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=yangang@kylinos.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox