From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Gang Yan" <gang.yan@linux.dev>
Cc: mptcp@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v2 2/5] mptcp: pm: change path_manager sysctl atomically
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 10:00:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260818100051.2A1BE1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260818094825.48446-3-gang.yan@linux.dev>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Missing module reference counting when setting the path manager sysctl leads to a Use-After-Free.
- [High] Missing module reference counting when setting the scheduler sysctl leads to a Use-After-Free.
--
--- Patch [2]: [PATCH mptcp-next v2 2/5] mptcp: pm: change path_manager sysctl atomically ---
commit c42ca00640178ef2df1ab9f51d1f65a9b722ec86
Author: Gang Yan <yangang@kylinos.cn>
mptcp: pm: change path_manager sysctl atomically
The per-netns path manager name is stored as an inline char[] buffer and
updated via strscpy() from the sysctl handler; a concurrent reader can
observe a half-written name. This patch replaces the string with a
pointer to the immutable struct mptcp_pm_ops.
Link: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/issues/626
> Following the tcp_congestion_control() model (and the scheduler change in
> the previous patch), store a pointer to the immutable struct mptcp_pm_ops
> instead of the name string:
[Severity: High]
Since this patch follows the scheduler change in the previous patch, does
mptcp_set_scheduler() have the same module reference counting issue?
If mptcp_set_scheduler() assigns pernet->scheduler without acquiring a
module reference, and the BPF map is unloaded, could a new MPTCP socket
creation trigger mptcp_init_sock() which calls mptcp_get_scheduler(),
causing a Use-After-Free when it dereferences the freed sched pointer?
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/ctrl.c b/net/mptcp/ctrl.c
> index 479b31eb30079..c0481b09c1a17 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/ctrl.c
> +++ b/net/mptcp/ctrl.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -85,9 +85,14 @@ int mptcp_get_pm_type(const struct net *net)
> return mptcp_get_pernet(net)->pm_type;
> }
>
> -const char *mptcp_get_path_manager(const struct net *net)
> +void mptcp_get_path_manager(const struct net *net, char *name)
> {
> - return mptcp_get_pernet(net)->path_manager;
> + struct mptcp_pm_ops *pm_ops;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + pm_ops = rcu_dereference(mptcp_get_pernet(net)->path_manager);
> + strscpy(name, pm_ops ? pm_ops->name : "kernel", MPTCP_PM_NAME_MAX);
[Severity: High]
If the module was unloaded and the pointer was not pinned, would this
dereference of pm_ops->name result in a Use-After-Free?
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> }
[ ... ]
> @@ -201,7 +206,7 @@ static int proc_blackhole_detect_timeout(const struct ctl_table *table,
[ ... ]
> rcu_read_lock();
> pm_ops = mptcp_pm_find(name);
> if (pm_ops)
> - strscpy(path_manager, name, MPTCP_PM_NAME_MAX);
> + xchg(&pernet->path_manager, pm_ops);
[Severity: High]
Does this assignment need to pin the module (e.g., via bpf_try_module_get())
before saving the pointer?
If a user with CAP_NET_ADMIN sets a BPF struct_ops map as the default path
manager, and then unloads the BPF program, the map is deleted and the
struct mptcp_pm_ops memory is freed.
Could this leave a dangling pointer in pernet->path_manager that causes the
Use-After-Free mentioned above when mptcp_get_path_manager() is subsequently
called?
> else
> ret = -ENOENT;
> rcu_read_unlock();
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260818094825.48446-1-gang.yan@linux.dev?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-18 10:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-18 9:48 [PATCH mptcp-next v2 0/5] mptcp: avoid data-races around the sysctls Gang Yan
2026-08-18 9:48 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 1/5] mptcp: sched: change scheduler sysctl atomically Gang Yan
2026-08-18 9:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 12:56 ` gang.yan
2026-08-18 15:50 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-08-18 9:48 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 2/5] mptcp: pm: change path_manager " Gang Yan
2026-08-18 10:00 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-18 12:57 ` gang.yan
2026-08-18 15:52 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-08-18 9:48 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 3/5] mptcp: use READ_ONCE() over sysctls Gang Yan
2026-08-18 10:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 13:02 ` gang.yan
2026-08-18 15:57 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-08-18 9:48 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 4/5] Squash to "mptcp: pm: init and release mptcp_pm_ops" Gang Yan
2026-08-18 10:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 13:06 ` gang.yan
2026-08-18 9:48 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 5/5] Squash to "bpf: Add mptcp packet scheduler struct_ops" Gang Yan
2026-08-18 11:13 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 0/5] mptcp: avoid data-races around the sysctls MPTCP CI
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-08-18 9:39 Gang Yan
2026-08-18 9:39 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2 2/5] mptcp: pm: change path_manager sysctl atomically Gang Yan
2026-08-18 9:48 ` gang.yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260818100051.2A1BE1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=gang.yan@linux.dev \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox