From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Geliang Tang" <geliang@kernel.org>
Cc: mptcp@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v4 3/5] mptcp: implement read_skb for sockmap stream verdict
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2026 07:31:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260824073116.E662A1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e785dea9d7ecfff7d8d49862833930cc742df5a4.1787554581.git.tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Critical] Calling skb_pull() with an unvalidated offset on potentially non-linear SKBs causes a kernel BUG() panic.
- [High] Data consumed by the BPF stream verdict program does not trigger MPTCP receive window updates or buffer auto-tuning.
- [High] Error paths drop SKBs without advancing consumption state, leading to receive window leaks and deadlocks.
--
--- Patch [3]: [PATCH mptcp-next v4 3/5] mptcp: implement read_skb for sockmap stream verdict ---
commit b365e36f46ed4c92c3a7c83b8b32cf1113c12bbf
Author: Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>
mptcp: implement read_skb for sockmap stream verdict
This commit adds mptcp_read_skb() to allow BPF sockmap stream verdict
programs to process MPTCP sockets. It peeks skbs from the receive queue,
adjusts offsets with skb_pull(), unlinks them, and passes them to the BPF
program while updating the bytes_consumed counter.
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> index 265a07e73a529..c1e26c6e5c17b 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -4780,6 +4780,36 @@ static ssize_t mptcp_splice_read(struct socket *sock, loff_t *ppos,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int mptcp_read_skb(struct sock *sk, skb_read_actor_t recv_actor)
> +{
> + struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
> + struct sk_buff *skb;
> + int copied = 0;
> + u32 offset;
> +
> + if (sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN)
> + return -ENOTCONN;
> +
> + while ((skb = mptcp_recv_skb(sk, &offset)) != NULL) {
> + int used;
> +
> + if (offset)
> + skb_pull(skb, offset);
[Severity: Critical]
Does this risk a kernel panic? If the socket buffer in the receive queue is
non-linear (such as from GRO on the TCP subflow or page frags), and the
offset is greater than the linear part of the buffer (skb_headlen), calling
skb_pull() without first linearizing it can cause length underflows.
If skb->len drops below skb->data_len, it will trigger the BUG_ON() in
skb_pull_inline().
Should pskb_may_pull() be used here to ensure the bytes are in the linear
region first?
> +
> + __skb_unlink(skb, &sk->sk_receive_queue);
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!skb_set_owner_sk_safe(skb, sk));
> + used = recv_actor(sk, skb);
> + if (used < 0) {
> + if (!copied)
> + copied = used;
> + break;
> + }
[Severity: High]
If the recv_actor returns an error and drops the buffer, this breaks the
loop without adding the dropped bytes to bytes_consumed.
Since tcp_eat_skb() is a no-op for MPTCP sockets, does this leave
bytes_consumed permanently out of sync with bytes_received? This might lead
to a permanent loss of receive window capacity and eventual connection
stalls.
> + copied += used;
> + msk->bytes_consumed += used;
[Severity: High]
Should this update also trigger receive window updates and buffer
auto-tuning?
After advancing bytes_consumed, omitting calls to mptcp_cleanup_rbuf() and
mptcp_rcv_space_adjust() means MPTCP will not proactively send window update
ACKs when the window opens.
The sender might eventually stall and rely on slow zero window probes to
discover the new window.
> + }
> + return copied;
> +}
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1787554581.git.tanggeliang@kylinos.cn?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-24 7:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-24 7:09 [PATCH mptcp-next v4 0/5] implement psock_update_sk_prot Geliang Tang
2026-08-24 7:09 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v4 1/5] mptcp: implement .splice_eof Geliang Tang
2026-08-24 7:09 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v4 2/5] selftests: mptcp: connect: trigger splice_eof Geliang Tang
2026-08-24 7:09 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v4 3/5] mptcp: implement read_skb for sockmap stream verdict Geliang Tang
2026-08-24 7:31 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-24 7:09 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v4 4/5] mptcp: implement psock_update_sk_prot Geliang Tang
2026-08-24 7:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 7:09 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v4 5/5] selftests/bpf: Update sockmap tests for MPTCP Geliang Tang
2026-08-24 7:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 8:40 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v4 0/5] implement psock_update_sk_prot MPTCP CI
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260824073116.E662A1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=geliang@kernel.org \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox