From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: mptcp@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH mptcp-net 2/2] Squash-to: "mptcp: do not reschedule the RTX timer for fallback sockets"
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2026 10:30:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260826103038.1CE861F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3d8a1534a8b0609c6ddcd593f4ed8957be019657.1787739122.git.pabeni@redhat.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Non-blocking MPTCP Fastopen bypasses `mptcp_connect`, leaving the socket permanently in `TCP_CLOSE` and failing to enable the RTX timer.
--
commit 4679eada053d3ad7385facbcb9d12c98ccd146f2
Author: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Subject: Squash-to: "mptcp: do not reschedule the RTX timer for fallback sockets"
This commit replaces the MPTCP_RTX_DISABLED flag with MPTCP_RTX_ENABLED to
explicitly control the retransmit timer status across the socket lifecycle.
It sets the enabled flag during active connect and passive initialization.
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> index 2f17c5daa704e..a28a0506d28da 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -4154,6 +4155,7 @@ static int mptcp_connect(struct sock *sk, struct sockaddr_unsized *uaddr,
> return PTR_ERR(ssk);
>
> mptcp_set_state(sk, TCP_SYN_SENT);
> + set_bit(MPTCP_RTX_ENABLED, &msk->flags);
[Severity: High]
Does this change leave the RTX timer disabled during non-blocking Fastopen
connections?
When a non-blocking TCP Fast Open connection is initiated on an MPTCP socket
(using MSG_FASTOPEN and MSG_DONTWAIT), mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen() skips the call
to __inet_stream_connect(), which bypasses mptcp_connect() entirely:
net/mptcp/protocol.c:mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen() {
...
if (ret == -EINPROGRESS && !(msg->msg_flags & MSG_DONTWAIT)) {
ret = __inet_stream_connect(sk->sk_socket, msg->msg_name,
msg->msg_namelen, msg->msg_flags, 1);
...
}
Because mptcp_connect() is bypassed, MPTCP_RTX_ENABLED is never set, and the
socket state remains TCP_CLOSE instead of TCP_SYN_SENT.
This causes __mptcp_sync_state() to skip transitioning the socket to
TCP_ESTABLISHED:
net/mptcp/subflow.c:__mptcp_sync_state() {
...
if (sk->sk_state == TCP_SYN_SENT) {
/* subflow->idsn is always available is TCP_SYN_SENT state,
* even for the FASTOPEN scenarios
*/
...
}
Will this cause non-blocking Fastopen connections to become permanently stuck
in TCP_CLOSE without an active retransmit timer if packet loss occurs?
> subflow = mptcp_subflow_ctx(ssk);
> #ifdef CONFIG_TCP_MD5SIG
> /* no MPTCP if MD5SIG is enabled on this socket or we may run out of
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/f1e8ffe44c3756195391a25ecf60e56e02e0f34f.1787739122.git.pabeni@redhat.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-26 10:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-26 10:13 [PATCH mptcp-net 1/2] mptcp: prevent race between disconnect() and rtx Paolo Abeni
2026-08-26 10:13 ` [PATCH mptcp-net 2/2] Squash-to: "mptcp: do not reschedule the RTX timer for fallback sockets" Paolo Abeni
2026-08-26 10:30 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-26 14:35 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-08-26 11:40 ` MPTCP CI
2026-08-26 12:38 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-08-26 14:38 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-08-26 17:47 ` Matthieu Baerts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260826103038.1CE861F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox