From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Zihan Xi" <zihanx@nebusec.ai>
Cc: mptcp@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 2/2] mptcp: diag: bound listener bucket lock hold
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2026 12:54:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260902125435.416281F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <db1f34ca8461c7b0dc5ec504ea1b99c24b909e34.1788248601.git.zihanx@nebusec.ai>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Batch-relative offset used as an absolute skip count corrupts the resumption state (`diag_ctx->l_num`), causing massive duplicate dumps or infinite loops.
- [High] Dereferencing `ctx->conn` before verifying the socket ULP type leads to an out-of-bounds read for non-MPTCP sockets.
- [High] Dropping the lock and missing re-check of `icsk_ulp_data` after taking a reference on the `SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU` MPTCP socket causes a TOCTOU race.
--
commit 18ad84befba3a7e705432d2c50d6139e9f7b55e6
Author: Zihan Xi <zihanx@nebusec.ai>
Date: Tue Sep 1 12:53:47 2026 +0000
mptcp: diag: bound listener bucket lock hold
This commit modifies the MPTCP listener diag dump to collect referenced
sockets while holding the bucket lock, and then executes sk_diag_dump()
after releasing the lock. It aims to reduce the lock hold time and tracks
resumption using a referenced cursor.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1785307984.git.zihanx@nebusec.ai/
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/mptcp_diag.c b/net/mptcp/mptcp_diag.c
> index 136c2d05c0eeb..37b33ea5d79de 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/mptcp_diag.c
> +++ b/net/mptcp/mptcp_diag.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -84,64 +98,102 @@ static void mptcp_diag_dump_listeners(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callba
> hinfo = net->ipv4.tcp_death_row.hashinfo;
>
> for (i = diag_ctx->l_slot; i <= hinfo->lhash2_mask; i++) {
> + struct sock *tmp, *sk, *sk_arr[MPTCP_DIAG_BULK_SZ];
> struct inet_listen_hashbucket *ilb;
> + int num_arr[MPTCP_DIAG_BULK_SZ];
> struct hlist_nulls_node *node;
[ ... ]
> + for (idx = 0; idx < accum; idx++) {
> + const struct mptcp_subflow_context *ctx;
> + const struct tcp_ulp_ops *ulp_ops;
> + struct inet_sock *inet;
> +
> + sk = sk_arr[idx];
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + ctx = rcu_dereference(inet_csk(sk)->icsk_ulp_data);
> + ulp_ops = READ_ONCE(inet_csk(sk)->icsk_ulp_ops);
> + inet = inet_sk(sk);
> + tmp = ctx ? ctx->conn : NULL;
[Severity: High]
Can dereferencing `ctx->conn` here before verifying the ULP protocol name
lead to an out-of-bounds read?
If another protocol (like TLS or SMC) attaches a smaller ULP context to a
TCP listener, `ctx` would point to that smaller structure, and reading
`ctx->conn` would access memory past the end of the ULP object. Should the
ULP type be checked before accessing `ctx->conn`?
> + if (!ctx || !ulp_ops || strcmp(ulp_ops->name, "mptcp") ||
> + !tmp || !net_eq(sock_net(tmp), net) ||
> + (r->sdiag_family != AF_UNSPEC &&
> + tmp->sk_family != r->sdiag_family) ||
> + (r->id.idiag_sport != inet->inet_sport &&
> + r->id.idiag_sport) ||
> + !refcount_inc_not_zero(&tmp->sk_refcnt)) {
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + goto processed_listener_sk;
> + }
> + rcu_read_unlock();
[Severity: High]
Since sockets are allocated with SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU, and the listener hash
bucket lock has been dropped at this point, is it possible for the `tmp`
socket to be freed and reallocated as an unrelated socket between finding it
and successfully incrementing the refcount?
Does the code need to re-check `rcu_dereference(inet_csk(sk)->icsk_ulp_data)`
against `ctx` after taking the refcount to ensure the object was not
reallocated during the lockless window?
> + if (ret >= 0) {
> + ret = sk_diag_dump(tmp, skb, cb, r, net_admin);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + num = num_arr[idx];
> + }
> + sock_put(tmp);
> +processed_listener_sk:
> + if (ret >= 0)
> + mptcp_diag_save_cursor(cb_data, i, sk);
> + sock_put(sk);
> + }
> +
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + diag_ctx->l_slot = i;
> + diag_ctx->l_num = num;
> + return;
> + }
[Severity: High]
`diag_ctx->l_num` tracks the absolute position in the bucket, but `num` was
reset to 0 at the start of `resume_listen_walk`.
If the dump fails (e.g. skb is full), doesn't saving this batch-relative `num`
into `diag_ctx->l_num` corrupt the absolute progress state? Because it saves a
small relative number, if the cursor is invalidated later, the dump would fall
back to skipping elements from the start, causing massive duplicate dumps or
infinite loops.
> +
> + cond_resched();
> +
> + if (accum == MPTCP_DIAG_BULK_SZ) {
> + diag_ctx->l_num = 0;
> + goto resume_listen_walk;
> + }
[Severity: High]
Similarly, on a successful batch, `diag_ctx->l_num` is explicitly set to 0.
Does this intentionally destroy the absolute index between batches?
If the cursor gets lost later, this would guarantee a total rewind to the
beginning of the bucket.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1788248601.git.zihanx@nebusec.ai?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-02 12:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-01 12:53 [PATCH net v2 0/2] tcp: diag: bound bucket lock hold in diag dump paths Zihan Xi
2026-09-01 12:53 ` [PATCH net v2 1/2] tcp: diag: bound bucket lock hold in tcp_diag_dump() Zihan Xi
2026-09-02 12:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-07 4:22 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-07 4:48 ` zihan xi
2026-09-07 7:05 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-09-07 7:15 ` zihan xi
2026-09-07 7:41 ` zihan xi
2026-09-01 12:53 ` [PATCH net v2 2/2] mptcp: diag: bound listener bucket lock hold Zihan Xi
2026-09-02 12:54 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-07 4:22 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-07 4:49 ` zihan xi
2026-09-07 7:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-09-01 13:58 ` [PATCH net v2 0/2] tcp: diag: bound bucket lock hold in diag dump paths MPTCP CI
2026-09-03 2:09 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-09-03 2:35 ` zihan xi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260902125435.416281F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=zihanx@nebusec.ai \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox