MPTCP Linux Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <matttbe@kernel.org>
To: mptcp@lists.linux.dev, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	sashal@kernel.org, "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <matttbe@kernel.org>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 7.2.y 1/4] mptcp: move the stale logic out of retrans scheduler
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2026 21:35:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260919193541.1915297-7-matttbe@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260919193541.1915297-6-matttbe@kernel.org>

From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>

commit 6cafe51e0f98fe60a106783d30b2f4c4b6039f4c upstream.

This allow separating the stale logic invocation and the retrans
scheduler, and will simplify the next patch.

It's also a cleaner design as the retrans scheduler has currently
too many side effects. As a possible downside, the retrans work will
now traverse the subflows list additional times; that does not matter
much, as this is slowpath.

While at it, pick more accurate names for the involved helpers and
explicitly note that the per subflow stale data is under msk socket
lock protection.

The scheduler and the stale logic may observe different subflow
statues, as no subflow lock is acquired. This is intentional and not
harmful, worst case leading to slower retransmissions.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260807-net-next-mptcp-oooq-pruning-v3-2-dbc1eb853cc3@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Stable-dep-of: 2b0f561f21b2 ("mptcp: avoid unneeded actions on subflow reset")
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
---
 net/mptcp/pm.c       | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 net/mptcp/protocol.c |  4 ++--
 net/mptcp/protocol.h | 11 +++++++----
 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm.c b/net/mptcp/pm.c
index 4e1d65083b24..79bf88ca033b 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/pm.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/pm.c
@@ -1065,7 +1065,8 @@ bool mptcp_pm_is_backup(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock_common *skc)
 	return mptcp_pm_nl_is_backup(msk, &skc_local);
 }
 
-static void mptcp_pm_subflows_chk_stale(const struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock *ssk)
+static void
+mptcp_pm_subflow_chk_stale(const struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock *ssk)
 {
 	struct mptcp_subflow_context *iter, *subflow = mptcp_subflow_ctx(ssk);
 	struct sock *sk = (struct sock *)msk;
@@ -1102,22 +1103,34 @@ static void mptcp_pm_subflows_chk_stale(const struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct soc
 	}
 }
 
-void mptcp_pm_subflow_chk_stale(const struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock *ssk)
+void mptcp_pm_chk_stale(const struct mptcp_sock *msk)
 {
-	struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow = mptcp_subflow_ctx(ssk);
-	u32 rcv_tstamp = READ_ONCE(tcp_sk(ssk)->rcv_tstamp);
+	struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow;
 
-	/* keep track of rtx periods with no progress */
-	if (!subflow->stale_count) {
-		subflow->stale_rcv_tstamp = rcv_tstamp;
-		subflow->stale_count++;
-	} else if (subflow->stale_rcv_tstamp == rcv_tstamp) {
-		if (subflow->stale_count < U8_MAX)
+	mptcp_for_each_subflow(msk, subflow) {
+		struct sock *ssk = mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow);
+		u32 rcv_tstamp;
+
+		if (!__mptcp_subflow_active(subflow))
+			continue;
+
+		/* No data outstanding at TCP level? not stale */
+		if (tcp_rtx_and_write_queues_empty(ssk))
+			continue;
+
+		/* keep track of rtx periods with no progress */
+		rcv_tstamp = READ_ONCE(tcp_sk(ssk)->rcv_tstamp);
+		if (!subflow->stale_count) {
+			subflow->stale_rcv_tstamp = rcv_tstamp;
 			subflow->stale_count++;
-		mptcp_pm_subflows_chk_stale(msk, ssk);
-	} else {
-		subflow->stale_count = 0;
-		mptcp_subflow_set_active(subflow);
+		} else if (subflow->stale_rcv_tstamp == rcv_tstamp) {
+			if (subflow->stale_count < U8_MAX)
+				subflow->stale_count++;
+			mptcp_pm_subflow_chk_stale(msk, ssk);
+		} else {
+			subflow->stale_count = 0;
+			mptcp_subflow_set_active(subflow);
+		}
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index 97523fa284d5..6db944b5c423 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -2471,7 +2471,6 @@ struct sock *mptcp_subflow_get_retrans(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
 
 		/* still data outstanding at TCP level? skip this */
 		if (!tcp_rtx_and_write_queues_empty(ssk)) {
-			mptcp_pm_subflow_chk_stale(msk, ssk);
 			min_stale_count = min_t(int, min_stale_count, subflow->stale_count);
 			continue;
 		}
@@ -2803,9 +2802,10 @@ static void __mptcp_retrans(struct sock *sk)
 	int ret, err;
 	u16 len = 0;
 
+	mptcp_pm_chk_stale(msk);
+
 	mptcp_clean_una_wakeup(sk);
 
-	/* first check ssk: need to kick "stale" logic */
 	err = mptcp_sched_get_retrans(msk);
 	dfrag = mptcp_rtx_head(sk);
 	if (!dfrag) {
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.h b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
index dbb40295165b..825533614468 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
@@ -581,12 +581,11 @@ struct mptcp_subflow_context {
 		remote_key_valid : 1,        /* received the peer key from */
 		disposable : 1,	    /* ctx can be free at ulp release time */
 		closing : 1,	    /* must not pass rx data to msk anymore */
-		stale : 1,	    /* unable to snd/rcv data, do not use for xmit */
 		valid_csum_seen : 1,        /* at least one csum validated */
 		is_mptfo : 1,	    /* subflow is doing TFO */
 		close_event_done : 1,       /* has done the post-closed part */
 		mpc_drop : 1,	    /* the MPC option has been dropped in a rtx */
-		__unused : 8;
+		__unused : 9;
 	bool	data_avail;
 	bool	scheduled;
 	bool	pm_listener;	    /* a listener managed by the kernel PM? */
@@ -605,7 +604,11 @@ struct mptcp_subflow_context {
 	u8	reset_seen:1;
 	u8	reset_transient:1;
 	u8	reset_reason:4;
-	u8	stale_count;
+	u8	stale_count;	    /* Protected by the msk socket lock */
+	u8	stale;		    /* Protected by the msk socket lock,
+				     * if set the subflow is unable to snd/rcv
+				     * data, the schedule should skip it
+				     */
 
 	u32	subflow_id;
 
@@ -1104,7 +1107,7 @@ int mptcp_pm_parse_entry(struct nlattr *attr, struct genl_info *info,
 bool mptcp_pm_addr_families_match(const struct sock *sk,
 				  const struct mptcp_addr_info *loc,
 				  const struct mptcp_addr_info *rem);
-void mptcp_pm_subflow_chk_stale(const struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock *ssk);
+void mptcp_pm_chk_stale(const struct mptcp_sock *msk);
 void mptcp_pm_new_connection(struct mptcp_sock *msk, const struct sock *ssk, int server_side);
 void mptcp_pm_fully_established(struct mptcp_sock *msk, const struct sock *ssk);
 bool mptcp_pm_allow_new_subflow(struct mptcp_sock *msk);
-- 
2.55.0


  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-19 19:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-19 19:35 [PATCH 7.2.y 0/4] mptcp: fix recent failed backports (20260919) Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-09-19 19:35 ` Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) [this message]
2026-09-20  7:36   ` Patch "mptcp: move the stale logic out of retrans scheduler" has been added to the 7.2-stable tree gregkh
2026-09-19 19:35 ` [PATCH 7.2.y 2/4] mptcp: avoid unneeded actions on subflow reset Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-09-20  7:36   ` Patch "mptcp: avoid unneeded actions on subflow reset" has been added to the 7.2-stable tree gregkh
2026-09-19 19:35 ` [PATCH 7.2.y 3/4] mptcp: close race between scheduler and state change Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-09-20  7:36   ` Patch "mptcp: close race between scheduler and state change" has been added to the 7.2-stable tree gregkh
2026-09-19 19:35 ` [PATCH 7.2.y 4/4] mptcp: fix bad accounting in __mptcp_subflow_push_pending() Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-09-20  7:36   ` Patch "mptcp: fix bad accounting in __mptcp_subflow_push_pending()" has been added to the 7.2-stable tree gregkh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260919193541.1915297-7-matttbe@kernel.org \
    --to=matttbe@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox