From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 285C03D1702 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2026 06:30:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787121019; cv=none; b=WbWH9HgyI+7Jx2ow2rFbGFsAx34U7Sz/eE1oprjfY/ulHL5buZ9giCnr4I9/2fVZh/nOi5jz0yvK7c8gONfg+FN5WOMkZn2azxRvsagsvYQr5XgrKUN3HegKEMHEeiSn8PjYTFXicyC9dRYTuy6UFvw9TW2vEXufOW+GT7umYSg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787121019; c=relaxed/simple; bh=TBFOePm8cMzYKhU3vyIShEXY00eitdiRFh0y0WZevGk=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=kO7l3DDeM11WvosCIdjZo3AKbdtffg2dwxlD1gx4MdTLaU+Hf/UbPr1IcQ1iMANaRao5goWPsAZ9/japMqzUl230+GIjtU5rwgYtqSC+3gtAFSi6sbImvGdPzRsvofSUUzswZpTpYxPXub1kJ/8Mw63hDsJx+FeTw/AhcdXmLAY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=oRRHXiyW; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="oRRHXiyW" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 957371F000E9; Wed, 19 Aug 2026 06:30:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1787121017; bh=iufWwQrLCWR4/i68tOgkDk2uavOknctOFALVJNYZtZg=; h=Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=oRRHXiyWJOHJ9u453Z7kklwJIHvS0L14Mi5DgpcGfZup84mV757TWMX+Mf1KOWGu4 3QF849uki+CmXgKU+2zddKlPsLaxbPX0xS4lo1AZGr9fJVz2GS0gsrbcD7BrmBIaAa ArixKFJkzbz+43ugJrRbaMFFviqLjJZhcNwm6rQD+Sh2/RoAFBgyvH48ngbOvJoE40 HQRJHz3LjUhnIqvTjmz0FN7k/tx2WXPJ0Kv6HoviqgXD40KRQAufuB0lXADWc9mGSC 0OOcARNTxGIOGaURNQXQJleBP+hguQtQVvIP50DiAztDAU3y5qrKvQKqhtggZIh51S wD4oRWYSroqDA== Message-ID: <2bf1f87c0c70121075d268af1283d099dc4e1f6f.camel@kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH resend mptcp-net 0/4] mptcp: a few fixes From: Geliang Tang To: Matthieu Baerts , mptcp@lists.linux.dev Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2026 14:30:09 +0800 In-Reply-To: <6059ccd9-e28f-42f9-90cf-267d3d645a3f@kernel.org> References: <2a74fda9614c9a11b8789a33dcda21378660534c.camel@kernel.org> <6059ccd9-e28f-42f9-90cf-267d3d645a3f@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.56.2-9 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: mptcp@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Matt, On Tue, 2026-08-18 at 18:26 +0200, Matthieu Baerts wrote: > Hi Geliang, > > On 18/08/2026 09:52, Geliang Tang wrote: > > Hi Matt, > > > > On Sat, 2026-08-15 at 19:19 +0200, Matthieu Baerts wrote: > > > Hi Paolo, > > > > > > On 14/08/2026 15:38, Paolo Abeni wrote: > > > > This is mostly a follow-up to the recent OoO queue pruning > > > > series. > > > > Explicitly targeting net as we have already a lot of patches > > > > pending for > > > > net-next, and no need to rush IMHO. > > > > > > > > First 2 patches addresses explicit comments from sashiko, 3rd > > > > one > > > > is a > > > > somewhat unrelated cleanup I stumbled upon while implementing > > > > patch > > > > 4. > > > > > > > > The last patch fixes another thing implided by sashiko while > > > > reviewing > > > > the mentioned series. > > > > > > Thank you for this series, it looks good to me: > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) > > > > > > I will wait for the net-next → net merge to apply them to export- > > > net. > > > > If you have time, could you please merge this series into the > > export > > branch at your earliest convenience? My ongoing series, "Reduce the > > differences between TCP and MPTCP for TLS usage", conflicts with > > this > > one. > If that's OK, I will wait for the Net maintainers to send their PR to > Linus, which should be done in a day or two I suppose. Is that OK? Yes, absolutely - that works for me. Please take your time. Thanks, -Geliang > > Cheers, > Matt