From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>,
mptcp@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v2] mptcp: Do not traverse the subflow connection list without lock
Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 10:55:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3c51bc2850aa3d31eaf2e685d3c584d17a0e059d.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220513003521.548193-1-mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, 2022-05-12 at 17:35 -0700, Mat Martineau wrote:
> The MPTCP socket's conn_list (list of subflows) requires the socket lock
> to access. The MP_FAIL timeout code added such an access, where it would
> check the list of subflows both in timer context and (later) in workqueue
> context where the socket lock is held.
>
> Rather than check the list twice, remove the check in the timeout
> handler and only depend on the check in the workqueue. Also remove the
> MPTCP_FAIL_NO_RESPONSE flag, since mptcp_mp_fail_no_response() has
> insignificant overhead and can be checked on each worker run.
>
> Reported-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
> Fixes: 49fa1919d6bc ("mptcp: reset subflow when MP_FAIL doesn't respond")
> Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>
> v2: Remove flag.
>
> ---
> net/mptcp/protocol.c | 16 +---------------
> net/mptcp/protocol.h | 1 -
> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> index 3c55e7f45aef..d6aef4b13b8a 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> @@ -2182,23 +2182,10 @@ mp_fail_response_expect_subflow(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static void mptcp_check_mp_fail_response(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
> -{
> - struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow;
> - struct sock *sk = (struct sock *)msk;
> -
> - bh_lock_sock(sk);
> - subflow = mp_fail_response_expect_subflow(msk);
> - if (subflow)
> - __set_bit(MPTCP_FAIL_NO_RESPONSE, &msk->flags);
> - bh_unlock_sock(sk);
> -}
> -
> static void mptcp_timeout_timer(struct timer_list *t)
> {
> struct sock *sk = from_timer(sk, t, sk_timer);
>
> - mptcp_check_mp_fail_response(mptcp_sk(sk));
> mptcp_schedule_work(sk);
> sock_put(sk);
> }
> @@ -2575,8 +2562,7 @@ static void mptcp_worker(struct work_struct *work)
> if (test_and_clear_bit(MPTCP_WORK_RTX, &msk->flags))
> __mptcp_retrans(sk);
>
> - if (test_and_clear_bit(MPTCP_FAIL_NO_RESPONSE, &msk->flags))
> - mptcp_mp_fail_no_response(msk);
> + mptcp_mp_fail_no_response(msk);
>
> unlock:
> release_sock(sk);
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.h b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
> index 9933c711b787..9ccbe25dcc3e 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h
> +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
> @@ -117,7 +117,6 @@
> #define MPTCP_WORK_EOF 3
> #define MPTCP_FALLBACK_DONE 4
> #define MPTCP_WORK_CLOSE_SUBFLOW 5
> -#define MPTCP_FAIL_NO_RESPONSE 6
>
> /* MPTCP socket release cb flags */
> #define MPTCP_PUSH_PENDING 1
LGTM, Thanks!
Reviewed-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
BTW it looks like my recent patch made the infinite mappting test less
stable, but I still can't reproduce the issue locally :(
/P
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-13 8:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-13 0:35 [PATCH mptcp-next v2] mptcp: Do not traverse the subflow connection list without lock Mat Martineau
2022-05-13 2:10 ` mptcp: Do not traverse the subflow connection list without lock: Tests Results MPTCP CI
2022-05-13 8:55 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2022-05-16 16:22 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v2] mptcp: Do not traverse the subflow connection list without lock Matthieu Baerts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3c51bc2850aa3d31eaf2e685d3c584d17a0e059d.camel@redhat.com \
--to=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox