MPTCP Linux Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org>
To: Davide Caratti <dcaratti@redhat.com>
Cc: mptcp@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH mptcp-next] Squash to: "net: mptcp: use policy generated by YAML spec"
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 13:34:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <439ff464-675a-40d7-9c1b-3e8224a23be2@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKa-r6vwzXYMcn7aP_ap+aHsApCngjwBRraUEk=zQSV2WngJ3g@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Davide,

On 13/10/2023 17:53, Davide Caratti wrote:
> hello Matthieu,
> 
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 5:07 PM Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Davide,
>>
> 
>>
>> I'm not sure to understand your modification: is it just a test patch to
>> check that the CI is OK with the modifications, or do you want to have
>> this patch included in the tree?
> 
> yes the goal was to check NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN() with CI (we already
> have it, but better to double check on top of the whole series).
> By the way , I see a failure but it doesn't seem real (I hope :) )

Good!

>> Because I guess we cannot just accept this patch, we also need a
>> modification of the YAML spec and the YNL tool. Then this file you
>> modified here will be re-generated, and we will get this new result, no?
> 
> right, I have a series ready that also includes the parser of
> 'exact-len:' key in specfiles (and a de-uglified yaml spec, as per
> Jakub's comment). If you are ok with it, I will send this series
> directly to netdev - then, 'export' and 'net-next' will slightly
> differ until the next merge. Let me know if that is ok for you,

I would prefer to have squash-to patches, so we can easily review the
modifications and apply them in our tree before sending them to
'net-next' (or this last step in parallel). Also, by doing that, the
MPTCP CI will be able to validate the modifications.

If a different version is applied in net-next, the MPTCP tree will no
longer be in sync: it means the CI might not be able to automatically
sync with net-next and manual steps might be required.

But if the series had a lot of modifications and having squash-to
patches no longer make sense, we can work around that: reverting the
different patches one by one, resolving manually the conflicts, etc. I
can also try to apply a v2, but again, with manually steps :)

Cheers,
Matt
-- 
Tessares | Belgium | Hybrid Access Solutions
www.tessares.net

  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-16 11:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-13  9:45 [PATCH mptcp-next] Squash to: "net: mptcp: use policy generated by YAML spec" Davide Caratti
2023-10-13 11:13 ` Squash to: "net: mptcp: use policy generated by YAML spec": Tests Results MPTCP CI
2023-10-13 15:06 ` [PATCH mptcp-next] Squash to: "net: mptcp: use policy generated by YAML spec" Matthieu Baerts
2023-10-13 15:53   ` Davide Caratti
2023-10-16 11:34     ` Matthieu Baerts [this message]
2023-10-16 12:25       ` Davide Caratti
2023-10-16 12:47         ` Matthieu Baerts

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=439ff464-675a-40d7-9c1b-3e8224a23be2@kernel.org \
    --to=matttbe@kernel.org \
    --cc=dcaratti@redhat.com \
    --cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox