MPTCP Linux Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>
To: mptcp@lists.linux.dev, Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v6 0/6] Fix socket options used by NVMe over MPTCP
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 16:23:04 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4a4ce805c08bf5a8c2f34e0fa371b81317af795e.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cddcbdb5-b4ab-b99f-54ae-ee6cf8fd8cc5@gmail.com>

Hi Matt,

On Mon, 2026-08-17 at 05:11 +0000, MPTCP CI wrote:
> Hi Geliang,
> 
> Thank you for your modifications, that's great!
> 
> Our CI did some validations and here is its report:
> 
> - KVM Validation: normal (except selftest_mptcp_join): Success! ✅
> - KVM Validation: normal (only selftest_mptcp_join): Success! ✅
> - KVM Validation: debug (except selftest_mptcp_join): Success! ✅
> - KVM Validation: debug (only selftest_mptcp_join): Success! ✅
> - KVM Validation: btf-normal (only bpftest_all): Success! ✅
> - KVM Validation: btf-debug (only bpftest_all): Success! ✅

Sashiko has already reviewed this v6 and has no further comments. If
you have time, could you please take a look and review it as well?

Thanks,
-Geliang

> - Task:
> https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/actions/runs/31994206151
> 
> Initiator: Patchew Applier
> Commits:
> https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commits/f3f2396df333
> Patchwork:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/mptcp/list/?series=1146924
> 
> 
> If there are some issues, you can reproduce them using the same
> environment as
> the one used by the CI thanks to a docker image, e.g.:
> 
>     $ cd [kernel source code]
>     $ docker run -v "${PWD}:${PWD}:rw" -w "${PWD}" --privileged --rm
> -it \
>         --pull always mptcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker:latest \
>         auto-normal
> 
> For more details:
> 
>     https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker
> 
> 
> Please note that despite all the efforts that have been already done
> to have a
> stable tests suite when executed on a public CI like here, it is
> possible some
> reported issues are not due to your modifications. Still, do not
> hesitate to
> help us improve that ;-)
> 
> Cheers,
> MPTCP GH Action bot
> Bot operated by Matthieu Baerts (NGI0 Core)

      reply	other threads:[~2026-08-18  8:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-17  3:57 [PATCH mptcp-next v6 0/6] Fix socket options used by NVMe over MPTCP Geliang Tang
2026-08-17  3:57 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v6 1/6] mptcp: handle TCP_MAXSEG getsockopt in common case Geliang Tang
2026-08-17  3:57 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v6 2/6] mptcp: take TCP_MAXSEG handling into setsockopt_set_val Geliang Tang
2026-08-17  3:57 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v6 3/6] mptcp: inherit sk_reuse and fix dev bind override Geliang Tang
2026-08-17  3:57 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v6 4/6] mptcp: add TCP_SYNCNT setsockopt/getsockopt Geliang Tang
2026-08-17  3:57 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v6 5/6] mptcp: sockopt: implement IPV6_TCLASS Geliang Tang
2026-08-17  3:57 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v6 6/6] mptcp: copy subflow's tos/tclass to msk on accept Geliang Tang
2026-08-17  5:11 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v6 0/6] Fix socket options used by NVMe over MPTCP MPTCP CI
2026-08-18  8:23   ` Geliang Tang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4a4ce805c08bf5a8c2f34e0fa371b81317af795e.camel@kernel.org \
    --to=geliang@kernel.org \
    --cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=tanggeliang@kylinos.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox