From: Mat Martineau <martineau@kernel.org>
To: Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>
Cc: mptcp@lists.linux.dev, Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v3 3/3] selftests: mptcp: add last time actions tests
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2024 11:21:16 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5b22266f-922f-cfa3-f006-656262aa0351@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b5a4e6d634ae8fd3e0710b02f57f0998a3da7df0.1711784619.git.tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024, Geliang Tang wrote:
> From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
>
> This patch adds a new helper chk_msk_info() to show the counters in
> mptcp_info of the given infos, and check that the timestamps move
> forward. Use it to show newly added last_data_sent, last_data_recv
> and last_ack_recv in mptcp_info in diag.sh.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/diag.sh | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/diag.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/diag.sh
> index bc97ab33a00e..2f9f734015b4 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/diag.sh
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/diag.sh
> @@ -200,6 +200,34 @@ chk_msk_cestab()
> "${expected}" "${msg}" ""
> }
>
> +chk_msk_info()
> +{
> + local port="${1}"
> + local info
> +
> + for info in "${@:2}"; do
> + local cnt1 cnt2 msg
> +
> + cnt1=$(ss -N ${ns} -inHM dport ${port} | mptcp_lib_get_info_value "$info" "$info")
> + sleep 0.5
Hi Geliang -
With the loop structured this way, it sleeps 3 times. You could collect
the first timestamp for all three values (last_data_sent last_data_recv
last_ack_recv), then sleep once, then get all 3 "after" timestamps.
(Unless Matthieu doesn't care about the extra test time :) )
> + cnt2=$(ss -N ${ns} -inHM dport ${port} | mptcp_lib_get_info_value "$info" "$info")
> + msg="....chk ${info}"
> + mptcp_lib_print_title "${msg}"
> + if { [ -z "${cnt1}" ] || [ -z "${cnt2}" ]; } &&
> + ! mptcp_lib_expect_all_features; then
> + mptcp_lib_pr_skip "Feature probably not supported"
> + mptcp_lib_result_skip "${msg}"
> + elif [ "$((cnt1 + 500))" -lt "${cnt2}" ]; then
Using 500 here is likely to make this test flaky - Matthieu had suggested
250ms as a way to make sure the value moved forward but would not be
sensitive to small changes in packet timing.
Also please add a local "delta_ms" variable instead of the magic number
500.
> + mptcp_lib_pr_ok
> + mptcp_lib_result_pass "${msg}"
> + else
> + mptcp_lib_pr_fail "expected $((cnt1 + 500)) < $cnt2"
Suggest rephrasing: "value of ${info} changed by $((cnt2 - cnt1))ms,
expected at least ${delta_ms}ms"
- Mat
> + mptcp_lib_result_fail "${msg}"
> + ret=${KSFT_FAIL}
> + fi
> + done
> +}
> +
> wait_connected()
> {
> local listener_ns="${1}"
> @@ -233,6 +261,7 @@ echo "b" | \
> 127.0.0.1 >/dev/null &
> wait_connected $ns 10000
> chk_msk_nr 2 "after MPC handshake "
> +chk_msk_info 10000 last_data_sent last_data_recv last_ack_recv
> chk_msk_remote_key_nr 2 "....chk remote_key"
> chk_msk_fallback_nr 0 "....chk no fallback"
> chk_msk_inuse 2
> --
> 2.40.1
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-01 18:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-30 7:46 [PATCH mptcp-next v3 0/3] display "last time" actions info Geliang Tang
2024-03-30 7:46 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v3 1/3] mptcp: add last time fields in mptcp_sock Geliang Tang
2024-03-30 7:46 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v3 2/3] mptcp: add last time fields in mptcp_info Geliang Tang
2024-04-01 18:02 ` Mat Martineau
2024-03-30 7:46 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v3 3/3] selftests: mptcp: add last time actions tests Geliang Tang
2024-04-01 18:21 ` Mat Martineau [this message]
2024-04-02 8:58 ` Matthieu Baerts
2024-03-30 8:40 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v3 0/3] display "last time" actions info MPTCP CI
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5b22266f-922f-cfa3-f006-656262aa0351@kernel.org \
--to=martineau@kernel.org \
--cc=geliang@kernel.org \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tanggeliang@kylinos.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox