From: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org, martineau@kernel.org,
MPTCP Linux <mptcp@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mptcp: pm: only mark 'subflow' endp as available" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 10:25:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <60b65618-e025-444b-bb72-67db4592b60a@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2024082627-devotion-chewer-87af@gregkh>
Hi Greg,
On 26/08/2024 14:06, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
>
> The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree.
> If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
Thank you for the notification!
(...)
> ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>
> From 322ea3778965da72862cca2a0c50253aacf65fe6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <matttbe@kernel.org>
> Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 21:45:26 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] mptcp: pm: only mark 'subflow' endp as available
>
> Adding the following warning ...
>
> WARN_ON_ONCE(msk->pm.local_addr_used == 0)
>
> ... before decrementing the local_addr_used counter helped to find a bug
> when running the "remove single address" subtest from the mptcp_join.sh
> selftests.
>
> Removing a 'signal' endpoint will trigger the removal of all subflows
> linked to this endpoint via mptcp_pm_nl_rm_addr_or_subflow() with
> rm_type == MPTCP_MIB_RMSUBFLOW. This will decrement the local_addr_used
> counter, which is wrong in this case because this counter is linked to
> 'subflow' endpoints, and here it is a 'signal' endpoint that is being
> removed.
>
> Now, the counter is decremented, only if the ID is being used outside
> of mptcp_pm_nl_rm_addr_or_subflow(), only for 'subflow' endpoints, and
> if the ID is not 0 -- local_addr_used is not taking into account these
> ones. This marking of the ID as being available, and the decrement is
> done no matter if a subflow using this ID is currently available,
> because the subflow could have been closed before.
>
> Fixes: 06faa2271034 ("mptcp: remove multi addresses and subflows in PM")
Similar to my previous message linked to the backport of "mptcp: pm:
re-using ID of unused removed ADD_ADDR" where this patch depends on
86e39e04482b ("mptcp: keep track of local endpoint still available for
each msk"), I don't think we need to backport this patch to v5.15.
Cheers,
Matt
--
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.
parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-06 8:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <2024082627-devotion-chewer-87af@gregkh>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=60b65618-e025-444b-bb72-67db4592b60a@kernel.org \
--to=matttbe@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=martineau@kernel.org \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox