From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org>, mptcp@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 mptcp-net 1/2] mptcp: do not fallback when OoO is present
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 18:32:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6e8bb6a1-0c96-4fa5-b8bf-cd0253e4450e@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3990718e-e4a8-4eb2-965e-02847bb339c0@kernel.org>
On 11/13/25 10:08 AM, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
> On 13/11/2025 01:02, Paolo Abeni wrote:
>> On 11/11/25 6:50 PM, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
>>> On 11/11/2025 08:24, Paolo Abeni wrote:
>>>> In case of DSS corruption, the MPTCP protocol tries to avoid the
>>>> subflow reset if fallback is possible. Such corruptions happen in
>>>> the receive path; to ensure fallback is possible the stack additionally
>>>> need to check for OoO data, otherwise the fallback will break the data
>>>> stream.
>>>
>>> Thank you for the fix!
>>>> Fixes: e32d262c89e2 ("mptcp: handle consistently DSS corruption")
>>>> Closes: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/issues/598
>>>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> Note: this does not avoid the WARN(), but fixes the inconsistend
>>>> read() behavior; the ingress data is OoO, we should not ack it
>>>> ---
>>>> net/mptcp/protocol.c | 3 ++-
>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
>>>> index d6b08e1de358..7b966f105f89 100644
>>>> --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
>>>> +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
>>>> @@ -646,7 +646,8 @@ static void mptcp_check_data_fin(struct sock *sk)
>>>>
>>>> static void mptcp_dss_corruption(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock *ssk)
>>>> {
>>>> - if (!mptcp_try_fallback(ssk, MPTCP_MIB_DSSCORRUPTIONFALLBACK)) {
>>>> + if (!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&msk->out_of_order_queue) ||
>>>> + !mptcp_try_fallback(ssk, MPTCP_MIB_DSSCORRUPTIONFALLBACK)) {
>>>
>>> Does it mean we should check the OoO queue each time mptcp_try_fallback
>>> is called?
>>>
>>> Should we not eventually set msk->allow_infinite_fallback to false in
>>> mptcp_data_queue_ofo()?
>>
>> Good question. According to the RFC here we should unconditionally reset
>> the subflow. "historically" we try hard to fallback - even because in
>> early releases fallback was a bit to easy to obtain.
>>
>> Setting msk->allow_infinite_fallback = false in mptcp_data_queue_ofo()
>> could possibly hit performances. queue_ofo is basically fastpath with
>> multiple streams and we will likely need to acquire the fallback lock to
>> to the thing race free.
>>
>> I'm tempted to just do a plain reset here. WDYT?
>
> Can mptcp_dss_corruption() not be called before being in fully
> established mode? In this case, should we not fallback instead? e.g. if
> a middlebox start to alter MPTCP options after the 3WHS?
Even if we would be before reaching fully established status, the DSS
corruption caused by the pktdrill test causes MPTCP-level OoO with data
already acked at the TCP level. We can't drop it nor we can safely
fallback, we have do reset (if ofo queue) is not empty.
> Or maybe moving this RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&msk->out_of_order_queue) check to
> mptcp_try_fallback()? (mmh, we don't have the msk)
>
> Or maybe just a plain reset is OK here?
I think the main question is if constraining such resets to OoO cases
(in the attempt to do fallback in other scenarios) or always reset here.
I propose to keep it simple, minimize the difference from current status
and always check OoO.
/P
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-13 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-11 7:24 [PATCH v2 mptcp-net 0/2] mptcp: a couple of fixes Paolo Abeni
2025-11-11 7:24 ` [PATCH v2 mptcp-net 1/2] mptcp: do not fallback when OoO is present Paolo Abeni
2025-11-11 17:50 ` Matthieu Baerts
2025-11-13 0:02 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-11-13 9:08 ` Matthieu Baerts
2025-11-13 17:32 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2025-11-13 17:44 ` Matthieu Baerts
2025-11-11 7:24 ` [PATCH v2 mptcp-net 2/2] mptcp: do not drop partial packets Paolo Abeni
2025-11-11 9:09 ` [PATCH v2 mptcp-net 0/2] mptcp: a couple of fixes MPTCP CI
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6e8bb6a1-0c96-4fa5-b8bf-cd0253e4450e@redhat.com \
--to=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=matttbe@kernel.org \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox