From: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau at linux.intel.com>
To: mptcp at lists.01.org
Subject: [MPTCP] Re: [MPTCP][PATCH v2 mptcp-next] Squash to "mptcp: add rm_list in mptcp_out_options"
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 17:39:55 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <81d81d67-a9f5-d858-e54-7e8bc89f6542@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: cb5c8d16d873790895608fd0789cf6adbcaeb3d1.1613404578.git.geliangtang@gmail.com
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2403 bytes --]
On Tue, 16 Feb 2021, Geliang Tang wrote:
> This patch fixed the following smatch warnings:
> net/mptcp/options.c:687 mptcp_established_options_rm_addr() error: uninitialized symbol 'align'.
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com>
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter(a)oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliangtang(a)gmail.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - use roundup in mptcp_rm_addr_len
v2 looks good, thanks Geliang.
Mat
> ---
> net/mptcp/options.c | 14 ++++++--------
> net/mptcp/protocol.h | 8 ++++++++
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/options.c b/net/mptcp/options.c
> index e41410475f0e..73c712a5c6e6 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/options.c
> +++ b/net/mptcp/options.c
> @@ -673,21 +673,19 @@ static bool mptcp_established_options_rm_addr(struct sock *sk,
> struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow = mptcp_subflow_ctx(sk);
> struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(subflow->conn);
> struct mptcp_rm_list rm_list;
> - u8 i, align;
> + int i, len;
>
> if (!mptcp_pm_should_rm_signal(msk) ||
> !(mptcp_pm_rm_addr_signal(msk, remaining, &rm_list)))
> return false;
>
> - if (rm_list.nr > 1)
> - align = 5;
> - if (rm_list.nr > 5)
> - align = 9;
> -
> - if (remaining < TCPOLEN_MPTCP_RM_ADDR_BASE + align)
> + len = mptcp_rm_addr_len(rm_list);
> + if (len < 0)
> + return false;
> + if (remaining < len)
> return false;
>
> - *size = TCPOLEN_MPTCP_RM_ADDR_BASE + align;
> + *size = len;
> opts->suboptions |= OPTION_MPTCP_RM_ADDR;
> opts->rm_list = rm_list;
>
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.h b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
> index dd6bc475f848..3f42b6f55f02 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h
> +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
> @@ -708,6 +708,14 @@ static inline unsigned int mptcp_add_addr_len(int family, bool echo, bool port)
> return len;
> }
>
> +static inline int mptcp_rm_addr_len(struct mptcp_rm_list rm_list)
> +{
> + if (rm_list.nr == 0 || rm_list.nr >= MPTCP_RM_IDS_MAX)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + return TCPOLEN_MPTCP_RM_ADDR_BASE + roundup(rm_list.nr - 1, 4) + 1;
> +}
> +
> bool mptcp_pm_add_addr_signal(struct mptcp_sock *msk, unsigned int remaining,
> struct mptcp_addr_info *saddr, bool *echo, bool *port);
> bool mptcp_pm_rm_addr_signal(struct mptcp_sock *msk, unsigned int remaining,
> --
> 2.29.2
--
Mat Martineau
Intel
next reply other threads:[~2021-02-17 1:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-17 1:39 Mat Martineau [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-02-17 19:37 [MPTCP] Re: [MPTCP][PATCH v2 mptcp-next] Squash to "mptcp: add rm_list in mptcp_out_options" Matthieu Baerts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=81d81d67-a9f5-d858-e54-7e8bc89f6542@linux.intel.com \
--to=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox