From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A62F30FC3D for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2025 08:43:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763455420; cv=none; b=TxPOfDNi+yUn4qSdpYsyRmdGQtt+QtTdqENo0J9EMjQURarV8T+a6PEa73nRHzgUrD2Kuc2MI6a0FLMArBSWOBEzgr4UhaPjqc9FG6bL4f68mc3WSdWVQXZqIU5S5UxL/xBjvBQU6HBOGwFUVe+Y2uJAl9Wfcdus0oP5ktTyRbU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763455420; c=relaxed/simple; bh=/JSQXiTfJV3GZJ5dnuNIu3fiZ3VUbv9S8wwtLcqiR4w=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=cuBm/U2CGrci9W7q1sOW1BRIQ8VbaFc+VYVHNDmChRj3IB9m5awDNjxwzZ12VDsNZoNOUkv1Iiz6+Cl+6/FyvzSS8z9C188z29xtGlXHKpi+NFzv8gdBsRv5IOlxhADd+a7fIHfS9Qyi4EbHYnI+4zqFArl0h3Y6/ztD/GaDXoU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=FzbFidMH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="FzbFidMH" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 44C75C19422; Tue, 18 Nov 2025 08:43:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1763455419; bh=/JSQXiTfJV3GZJ5dnuNIu3fiZ3VUbv9S8wwtLcqiR4w=; h=Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=FzbFidMH+SHGtwM+PU0jNX5M3zIhgDG5c7g2Y4RVUx1h3V3jO5cHT2hsbWI7xV8NQ S77ruDfFzLbdEBPjrqcdnu9y2uvTq4xAmmZ+45ZUwSlKwLO4ZbY14953ywbWpBMpqk r9E0QDC2m5KgrW03qL6NcUWR1kWTlPk28CjVAr3zkZn3Ht4ryXiAbVp/j5EchmYUYU +WfvY0JMLw4msOXIu64MsgUAWEqk8dDFAxuXc95czcaZjIGtRMjyWDM+w6CmSQrJKe NZI0CaGApLVFVHEoOF1Dm8+zA9Quhhe3jRX12MyXwTX7jqR3jj8niRXvtBLwNn3Kkf Lbb9m8vAZn3Jw== Message-ID: <899b64e9d595ac0a2b256041bf91dba0010fcd9c.camel@kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH mptcp-net 0/2] selftests: mptcp: join: longer timeout From: Geliang Tang To: Matthieu Baerts , MPTCP Linux Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2025 16:43:33 +0800 In-Reply-To: <8aeea045-c68d-493a-8f83-4a9187480428@kernel.org> References: <20251112-slft-longer-timeout-v1-0-97aab145a062@kernel.org> <8aeea045-c68d-493a-8f83-4a9187480428@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.56.2-4 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: mptcp@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Matt, On Mon, 2025-11-17 at 12:08 +0100, Matthieu Baerts wrote: > Hello, > > On 12/11/2025 10:45, Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) wrote: > > A previous attempt was helping, but not enough as the background > > connections were still stopped after the timeout. That's what the > > MPTCP > > CI recently reported with the "delete and re-add" subtest taking a > > bit > > more than one minute in a debug environment. > > > > To play it safe, and because increasing the timeout for the > > background > > connections doesn't change anything to the end result (the transfer > > is > > not checked in this case), all subtests with a background > > connection not > > waiting for it to end now have a longer timeout. > > I hope it is OK if I apply these patches now: they are simple, linked > to > recent patches, and we still have quite a few patches in the queue. > > I'm planning to send them with other patches we have in the queue for > net ideally today. Sorry for the delay. I just replied my RB tags to them for -net. Thanks, -Geliang > > Cheers, > Matt