From: MPTCP CI <wpasupplicant.patchew@gmail.com>
To: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
Cc: mptcp@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v19 0/5] Reduce the differences between TCP and MPTCP for TLS usage
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2026 14:06:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8d68becb-be97-b91b-666e-e65aae77c877@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1793361629.git.tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
Hi Geliang,
Thank you for your modifications, that's great!
Our CI did some validations and here is its report:
- KVM Validation: normal (except selftest_mptcp_join): Unstable: 1 failed test(s): selftest_simult_flows ⚠️
- KVM Validation: normal (only selftest_mptcp_join): Success! ✅
- KVM Validation: debug (except selftest_mptcp_join): Success! ✅
- KVM Validation: debug (only selftest_mptcp_join): Success! ✅
- KVM Validation: btf-normal (only bpftest_all): Unstable: 3 failed test(s): bpftest_test_progs-cpuv4_mptcp bpftest_test_progs-no_alu32_mptcp bpftest_test_progs_mptcp ⚠️
- KVM Validation: btf-debug (only bpftest_all): Unstable: 3 failed test(s): bpftest_test_progs-cpuv4_mptcp bpftest_test_progs-no_alu32_mptcp bpftest_test_progs_mptcp ⚠️
- Perf: Success! ✅
- Task: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/actions/runs/41054949264
Initiator: Patchew Applier
Commits: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commits/b0f44e221b7b
Patchwork: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/mptcp/list/?series=1197128
If there are some issues, you can reproduce them using the same environment as
the one used by the CI thanks to a docker image, e.g.:
$ cd [kernel source code]
$ docker run -v "${PWD}:${PWD}:rw" -w "${PWD}" --privileged --rm -it \
--pull always mptcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker:latest \
auto-normal
For more details:
https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker
Please note that despite all the efforts that have been already done to have a
stable tests suite when executed on a public CI like here, it is possible some
reported issues are not due to your modifications. Still, do not hesitate to
help us improve that ;-)
Cheers,
MPTCP GH Action bot
Bot operated by Matthieu Baerts (NGI0 Core)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-30 14:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-30 12:06 [PATCH mptcp-next v19 0/5] Reduce the differences between TCP and MPTCP for TLS usage Geliang Tang
2026-10-30 12:06 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v19 1/5] mptcp: drop the mptcp_ooo_try_coalesce() helper Geliang Tang
2026-10-30 12:06 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v19 2/5] mptcp: drop the cant_coalesce CB field Geliang Tang
2026-10-30 12:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-30 12:06 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v19 3/5] mptcp: remove CB offset field Geliang Tang
2026-10-30 12:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-30 12:06 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v19 4/5] mptcp: sync mptcp skb cb layout with tcp one Geliang Tang
2026-10-30 12:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-30 12:06 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v19 5/5] mptcp: defer read_sock cleanup to mptcp_worker Geliang Tang
2026-10-30 12:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-30 14:06 ` MPTCP CI [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8d68becb-be97-b91b-666e-e65aae77c877@gmail.com \
--to=wpasupplicant.patchew@gmail.com \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tanggeliang@kylinos.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox